TL;DR;
I need a way to install arm-none-eabi-gcc on Raspberry Pi (Arch Linux
ARM) using pacman or from source.
Hi guys,
First of all, I know that this mailing list entertains questions and
information related to Arch Linux, not Arch Linux ARM. Since I have
received valuable suggestions on this
Hey all,
On 2016-12-21 17:41:24 (+0100), Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> at the moment I'm testing a new audio interface. Ardour5 (not
> from the testing repo) crashed on my machine, so I'm using Qtractor for
> the test. Perhaps Ardour 5.5 not only crashes on my machine.
So far I'm not experiencing these i
PS:
My apologies for my short reply, I'm busy at the moment.
If I have got more time again, I anyway will try to use Ardour 5 again.
Assuming it should be unstable, I perhaps won't spend much time in
troubleshooting, but at least would try to find out how to reproduce the
crash and at least run Ar
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 01:40:15 +0600, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
>On 21 December 2016 at 22:41, Ralf Mardorf
>wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:02:13 +0100, David Runge wrote:
>> >is it possible to push ardour 5.5 to extra and/or testing? We're
>> >getting really far behind by now :-/
>>
>> Hi,
On 21 December 2016 at 22:41, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:02:13 +0100, David Runge wrote:
> >is it possible to push ardour 5.5 to extra and/or testing? We're
> >getting really far behind by now :-/
>
> Hi,
>
> at the moment I'm testing a new audio interface. Ardour5 (not
> from
On 26-12-2016 02:54, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 12/24/2016 10:33 AM, Mauro Santos via arch-general wrote:
>> What other distros do is recommend a 1GB /boot or changing the
>> configuration to reduce the number of older kernels installed[1]. People
>> have complained about small libra
On 26.12.2016 13:12, NicoHood wrote:
> So we needed to verify the source otherwise. But there was no real
> option as md5/sha1 is broken
I fully agree that using stronger hashes is generally a good idea, but
please stop being ridiculous.
> and his internet is too slow to download it
> again via t
On 12/26/2016 01:21 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 26/12/16 22:12, NicoHood wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/16/2016 05:46 PM, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:27 AM, fnodeuser wrote:
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2016-November/028492.html
On 26/12/16 22:12, NicoHood wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/2016 05:46 PM, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:27 AM, fnodeuser wrote:
>>> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2016-November/028492.html
>>>
>>> i have a few things to add to this.
>>>
>>> the mes
On 12/16/2016 05:46 PM, Diego Viola via arch-general wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 3:27 AM, fnodeuser wrote:
>> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2016-November/028492.html
>>
>> i have a few things to add to this.
>>
>> the message digests at the download page for the .iso
10 matches
Mail list logo
