Am 02.09.2016 um 11:03 schrieb Magnus Therning:
Yes, it looks like it would work better. Is there some description of
what the presence of a letter actually means?
/M
The manpage for vercmp describes it with some examples:
Version comparison operates as follows:
Alphanumeric:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general
wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 06:00 PM, Diego Viola wrote:
>> No, I'm not saying that, please let's not make this personal, it's not.
>>
>> I'm also OK compiling my own bitcoin-qt or whatever, I'm just
>> concerned there are many outdated pack
On Fri, 02 Sep 2016 11:03:50 +0200
Magnus Therning wrote:
> Doug Newgard writes:
> > Sounds like .x would make more sense.
>
> Yes, it looks like it would work better. Is there some description of
> what the presence of a letter actually means?
>
> /M
>
Simply put, letters are less than nu
On 09/02/2016 05:03 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Yes, it looks like it would work better. Is there some description of
> what the presence of a letter actually means?
IIUC, it separates two individual components of the versioning,
everything before it is considered on its own and the component wit
On 02.09.2016 12:40, Bruno Pagani wrote:
Le 02/09/2016 à 12:29, Sebastian Lau via arch-general a écrit :
Hi folks,
again, some trusted user destroyed our extra repository again. I heard
rumors about who did it, but I can not verify it yet. Maybe he has
more than one account and he is destro
Sorry, my fault, never mind. He just made me silly, I was talking about
evince. Everything okay. 5x sorry.
On 02.09.2016 12:40, Bruno Pagani wrote:
Le 02/09/2016 à 12:29, Sebastian Lau via arch-general a écrit :
Hi folks,
again, some trusted user destroyed our extra repository again. I hea
The shadow of G
Its the same with Kicad but in inverse way. Kicad is a GTK aplicación
instead of KDE-ism
Please have a look at http://kde.org/applications/graphics/gwenview/ and
https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/gwenview
gwenview isn't gtk software.
On 02.09.2016 12:29, Sebastian Lau via arch-general wrote:
Hi folks,
again, some trusted user destroyed our extr
Le 02/09/2016 à 12:29, Sebastian Lau via arch-general a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
>
> again, some trusted user destroyed our extra repository again. I heard
> rumors about who did it, but I can not verify it yet. Maybe he has
> more than one account and he is destroying arch. At the moment I'm
> tryin
The mail with subject is mine, the others were never send from me. I'm
using thunderbird.
On 02.09.2016 12:29, Sebastian Lau wrote:
Hi folks,
again, some trusted user destroyed our extra repository again. I heard
rumors about who did it, but I can not verify it yet. Maybe he has
more than
Hi folks,
again, some trusted user destroyed our extra repository again. I heard
rumors about who did it, but I can not verify it yet. Maybe he has more
than one account and he is destroying arch. At the moment I'm trying to
clean up my beloved collaborative Arch, but it is not patchable at t
Doug Newgard writes:
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 23:57:07 +0200
> Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>> When packaging Haskell packages there's a bit of a twist to the version
>> numbers that I'm looking for a solution to.
>>
>> Upstream versions have two numbers, a version number (set by the
>> upstream deve
12 matches
Mail list logo
