Re: [arch-general] [PATCH] core/links: bump to version 2.13

2016-08-05 Thread Alive 4ever
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:57:35AM -0500, Jonathan Roemer wrote: > 2.13 is now in [testing]. Confirmed. Thanks to eworm for taking care of the package.

Re: [arch-general] rEFInd has been out of date for awhile.

2016-08-05 Thread mike lojkovic via arch-general
I emailed him awhile back, and haven't heard back. On Aug 5, 2016 3:58 PM, "Mike Cloaked via arch-general" < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:38 PM, mike lojkovic via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > Hey everybody, > > > > > > refind-efi packa

Re: [arch-general] rEFInd has been out of date for awhile.

2016-08-05 Thread Mike Cloaked via arch-general
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:38 PM, mike lojkovic via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Hey everybody, > > > refind-efi package in extra has been flagged out of date for about 6 > months. The latest version is 0.10.3. There is refind-efi-bin >

Re: [arch-general] Announcing pacpak

2016-08-05 Thread Bennett Piater
> I will need a new name for a pacpak without Flatpak (bpac and pacwrap > are already taken; maybe bubblepac) but I will continue working on it > slowly… Thanks for letting us know! I like bubblepac, it sounds good :) Cheers, Bennett -- GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577

[arch-general] rEFInd has been out of date for awhile.

2016-08-05 Thread mike lojkovic via arch-general
Hey everybody, refind-efi package in extra has been flagged out of date for about 6 months. The latest version is 0.10.3. There is refind-efi-bin in the aur. I'm just wondering if there are any plans to continue supporting rEFInd officially?

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH] core/links: bump to version 2.13

2016-08-05 Thread Jonathan Roemer
2.13 is now in [testing]. On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 08/05/16 at 01:01pm, Alive 4ever wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:08:29PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >> > On 08/05/16 at 10:56am, Alive 4ever wrote: >> > > Since links package has been flagged out of

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH] core/links: bump to version 2.13

2016-08-05 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 08/05/16 at 01:01pm, Alive 4ever wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:08:29PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > On 08/05/16 at 10:56am, Alive 4ever wrote: > > > Since links package has been flagged out of date for almost one month, I > > > can't help myself to contribute a patch and stop buggin

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH] core/links: bump to version 2.13

2016-08-05 Thread Alive 4ever
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:08:29PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On 08/05/16 at 10:56am, Alive 4ever wrote: > > Since links package has been flagged out of date for almost one month, I > > can't help myself to contribute a patch and stop bugging maintainer to > > package an updated version. >

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH] core/links: bump to version 2.13

2016-08-05 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 08/05/16 at 10:56am, Alive 4ever wrote: > Since links package has been flagged out of date for almost one month, I > can't help myself to contribute a patch and stop bugging maintainer to > package an updated version. Posting this kind of patches will not lead to the package being updated magic

[arch-general] [PATCH] core/links: bump to version 2.13

2016-08-05 Thread Alive 4ever
Since links package has been flagged out of date for almost one month, I can't help myself to contribute a patch and stop bugging maintainer to package an updated version. I've submitted this patch on aur mailing list and someone told me to post to the appropriate list. So, I post it here. Hopefu