Re: [arch-general] Enable translations in transmission-qt

2016-06-23 Thread Doug Newgard
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:14:17 -0500 Doug Newgard wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 02:01:59 +0300 > Alexey Rochev via arch-general wrote: > > > I emailed package maintainers directly, but they did not respond. > > Could anyone please tell me who is responsible for "transmission" > > packages? > > >

Re: [arch-general] Enable translations in transmission-qt

2016-06-23 Thread Doug Newgard
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 02:01:59 +0300 Alexey Rochev via arch-general wrote: > I emailed package maintainers directly, but they did not respond. > Could anyone please tell me who is responsible for "transmission" > packages? > > 2016-06-07 23:46 GMT+03:00, Alexey Rochev : > > 2016-05-30 0:18 GMT+03:

Re: [arch-general] Enable translations in transmission-qt

2016-06-23 Thread Alexey Rochev via arch-general
I emailed package maintainers directly, but they did not respond. Could anyone please tell me who is responsible for "transmission" packages? 2016-06-07 23:46 GMT+03:00, Alexey Rochev : > 2016-05-30 0:18 GMT+03:00, Alexey Rochev : >> Hi, >> I posted fixed PKGBUILD in https://bugs.archlinux.org/tas

Re: [arch-general] packer vs packer-io

2016-06-23 Thread Andre "Osku" Schmidt via arch-general
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Florian Pritz via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 23.06.2016 16:04, Andre "Osku" Schmidt via arch-general wrote: > > I would like to provide the user a single command to build "my" software > > (eg. make), but am not sure what i should do. >

Re: [arch-general] packer vs packer-io

2016-06-23 Thread Andre "Osku" Schmidt via arch-general
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Mauro Santos via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 23-06-2016 15:04, Andre "Osku" Schmidt via arch-general wrote: > > Hmm, > > > > so Archlinux has packer[0] that provides an executable named `packer` and > > now there is packer-io[1] that chan

Re: [arch-general] packer vs packer-io

2016-06-23 Thread Florian Pritz via arch-general
On 23.06.2016 16:04, Andre "Osku" Schmidt via arch-general wrote: > I would like to provide the user a single command to build "my" software > (eg. make), but am not sure what i should do. If there are pkg-config files or similar to detect the correct settings, use those. Otherwise, just default t

Re: [arch-general] packer vs packer-io

2016-06-23 Thread Mauro Santos via arch-general
On 23-06-2016 15:04, Andre "Osku" Schmidt via arch-general wrote: > Hmm, > > so Archlinux has packer[0] that provides an executable named `packer` and > now there is packer-io[1] that changes the upstream executable from > `packer` to `packer-io`. > > Now i have a Makefile that runs packer-io[1]

[arch-general] packer vs packer-io

2016-06-23 Thread Andre "Osku" Schmidt via arch-general
Hmm, so Archlinux has packer[0] that provides an executable named `packer` and now there is packer-io[1] that changes the upstream executable from `packer` to `packer-io`. Now i have a Makefile that runs packer-io[1] that fails on systems where its executable is not renamed to `packer-io`. (eg. e

Re: [arch-general] vagrant/virtualbox archlinux guest private_network

2016-06-23 Thread Óscar García Amor
Hi! If you need a base machine for Vagrant you can use mine: https://vagrantcloud.com/ogarcia/boxes/archlinux-x32 https://vagrantcloud.com/ogarcia/boxes/archlinux-x64 I update it once a month. Greetings. 2016-06-22 21:53 GMT+02:00 Andre "Osku" Schmidt via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.o