On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Rob Miller wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
> > > > Any reasons?
> > >
> > > Probably due to not en
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:26:20PM +0200, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
> > > Any reasons?
> >
> > Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the
> > name, RetroAr
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Rob Miller wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
> > Any reasons?
>
> Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the
> name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux
> project. Just thought th
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:40:39PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
> Any reasons?
Probably due to not enough interest in the package. Also, despite the
name, RetroArch has nothing whatsoever to do with the Arch Linux
project. Just thought this might bear mentioning.
Am 01.05.2016 um 20:40 schrieb Diego Viola:
Any reasons?
Hi,
There is no special reason, the arch maintainers simply don't have
enough interest in this project.
You can install it from the AUR, though.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository
https://wiki.archlinux.org/i
Any reasons?
6 matches
Mail list logo
