Re: [arch-general] FireFox 44 turning the bookmark toolbar+ extensions area + current tab into light gray (like selected) [gist image]

Do you have "gtk-application-prefer-dark-theme" set to "true" under you "gtk-3.0/settings.ini"? On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Rich wrote: > On 01/30/2016 07:57 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Damjan Georgievski >> wrote: Just updated Arch, and got FF

Re: [arch-general] FireFox 44 turning the bookmark toolbar+ extensions area + current tab into light gray (like selected) [gist image]

On 01/30/2016 07:57 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote: On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote: Just updated Arch, and got FF 44, but there's a new color behavior on the bookmark toolbar, the extensions area, and current tab. It looks like if everything was somehow selected, light gra

Re: [arch-general] FireFox 44 turning the bookmark toolbar+ extensions area + current tab into light gray (like selected) [gist image]

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote: >> Just updated Arch, and got FF 44, but there's a new color behavior on >> the bookmark toolbar, the extensions area, and current tab. >> >> It looks like if everything was somehow selected, light grayed. This >> is new, but I don't know

Re: [arch-general] FireFox 44 turning the bookmark toolbar+ extensions area + current tab into light gray (like selected) [gist image]

> Just updated Arch, and got FF 44, but there's a new color behavior on > the bookmark toolbar, the extensions area, and current tab. > > It looks like if everything was somehow selected, light grayed. This > is new, but I don't know if it's the new 44+ expected behavior, or > something that got b

[arch-general] FireFox 44 turning the bookmark toolbar+ extensions area + current tab into light gray (like selected) [gist image]

Hi, Just updated Arch, and got FF 44, but there's a new color behavior on the bookmark toolbar, the extensions area, and current tab. It looks like if everything was somehow selected, light grayed. This is new, but I don't know if it's the new 44+ expected behavior, or something that got broken,

Re: [arch-general] [arch-security] [Announcement] Discussion about restricting arch-security for public participation

Am 2016-01-30 um 20:37 schrieb Emil Lundberg: Getting posts about imminent and potential security risks from many different sides is f.i. something I still estimate about the Debian security list very much. I think the word you're looking for instead of "estimate" is "appreciate".

Re: [arch-general] [arch-security] [Announcement] Discussion about restricting arch-security for public participation

In my opinion I don't feel like we are urged to have a separate list as most of the time the topics blur the line and splitting it does not provide much benefit. Distributions tend to have own security lists so that people can receive security related stuff, only. To me there is simply too

Re: [arch-general] Gnucash 2.6.10-1 download error

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Francis Gerund wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Doug Newgard > wrote: > >> On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:08:58 -0500 >> Francis Gerund wrote: >> >> > But there sure seems to be a newer version in core: >> > >> > 1 exact match found. >> > Arch Repo Name V

Re: [arch-general] Gnucash 2.6.10-1 download error

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Doug Newgard wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:08:58 -0500 > Francis Gerund wrote: > > > But there sure seems to be a newer version in core: > > > > 1 exact match found. > > Arch Repo Name Version Description Last Updated Flag Date any Core > > archlinux-keyring >

Re: [arch-general] Gnucash 2.6.10-1 download error

On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:13:01 -0600, Doug Newgard wrote: >On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:08:58 -0500 Francis Gerund wrote: >> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/any/archlinux-keyring/ >> >> Is there a way to update archlinux-keyring without reinstalling the >> whole system? Yes, there is. The above

Re: [arch-general] Gnucash 2.6.10-1 download error

On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:08:58 -0500 Francis Gerund wrote: > But there sure seems to be a newer version in core: > > 1 exact match found. > Arch Repo Name Version Description Last Updated Flag Date any Core > archlinux-keyring > 2016

Re: [arch-general] Gnucash 2.6.10-1 download error

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 20:23:14 -0500, Francis Gerund wrote: > >After checking the mailing list archives, I found a similar problem was > >with the "courage" package, which was solved by (as root): > > > >pacman-key --refresh-keys > > Actua

Re: [arch-general] systemd user unit files from custom directory

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Andre "Osku" Schmidt wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote: >> On 30 January 2016 at 12:48, Andre "Osku" Schmidt >> wrote: >>> hello, >>> >>> thought i'd ask here first, in case it's a distro problem. >>> >>> was wondering if we can u

Re: [arch-general] systemd user unit files from custom directory

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote: > On 30 January 2016 at 12:48, Andre "Osku" Schmidt > wrote: >> hello, >> >> thought i'd ask here first, in case it's a distro problem. >> >> was wondering if we can use systemd to start and stop a daemon for >> testing purposes during de

Re: [arch-general] systemd user unit files from custom directory

On 30 January 2016 at 12:48, Andre "Osku" Schmidt wrote: > hello, > > thought i'd ask here first, in case it's a distro problem. > > was wondering if we can use systemd to start and stop a daemon for > testing purposes during development. meaning, i would like to not have > to "install" my daemon

[arch-general] systemd user unit files from custom directory

hello, thought i'd ask here first, in case it's a distro problem. was wondering if we can use systemd to start and stop a daemon for testing purposes during development. meaning, i would like to not have to "install" my daemon nor its systemd service file, and instead run all from the working dir