On 01/25/2016 01:35 PM, Solomon Lam wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I think I got my answer.
>
> I noticed that the 'desc' file of a package(inside the db) contains 'md5'
> and 'sha256' checksums as well. So, does pacman perform pgp verification or
> checksum verification during installation?
It j
Thanks for the reply. I think I got my answer.
I noticed that the 'desc' file of a package(inside the db) contains 'md5'
and 'sha256' checksums as well. So, does pacman perform pgp verification or
checksum verification during installation?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 17:45:17 +0100
Doug Newgard wrote:
Dev discussion here:
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2015-February/026953.html
Thanks, that's the context I needed to understand your decision.
Reading the dev discussion and the clear consensus emerging from it, I
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 17:29:51 +0100
Bastien Traverse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I opened FS#47893 [1] to discuss this issue, but it's been closed with
> no delay and I can't really have a discussion via re-opening requests.
>
> Upon installation of the tor package, directory /var/lib/tor is created
> (s
Hi,
I opened FS#47893 [1] to discuss this issue, but it's been closed with
no delay and I can't really have a discussion via re-opening requests.
Upon installation of the tor package, directory /var/lib/tor is created
(see PKGBUILD#40 [2]). Upon uninstallation, it is automatically deleted
**
On 01/25/2016 04:43 AM, Solomon Lam wrote:
> Hi, This is regarding package verification performed by pacman.
>
> Does pacman download the .sig file of a package while installing one? All I
> could find are the local cached copies of packages only but not their
> signatures. If thats the case, how
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:13:24 +0530
Solomon Lam wrote:
> Hi, This is regarding package verification performed by pacman.
>
> Does pacman download the .sig file of a package while installing one? All I
> could find are the local cached copies of packages only but not their
> signatures. If thats t
Hi!
I was a bit busy and just got to hacking my mkinitcpio now.
I decided to follow ProgAndy's idea and remove the current way of
mounting (default_mount_handler function) and instead create and use
mount hooks (by default the default_mount_handler and the mount call's
nearest lines is a new, ena
On 01/25/2016 10:27 AM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> huh, now what?
> [...]
> gpg: keyserver refresh failed: Permission denied
As the error message indicates, you need to do that as root.
It's also possible to grab the new archlinux-keyring package from [testing].
cheers,
Levente
signature.asc
My apologies, after taking a look at the archive, I noticed that this
issue already was reported.
I couldn't notice it, since there's an issue with my account:
"Note: your list delivery is currently disabled; it was disabled due to
excessive bounces. The last bounce was received on 12-Jan-2016."
Hi, This is regarding package verification performed by pacman.
Does pacman download the .sig file of a package while installing one? All I
could find are the local cached copies of packages only but not their
signatures. If thats the case, how does pacman verify the integrity of the
downloaded pa
Hi,
archlinux-keyring 20160123-1 is needed, but not available, if testing
isn't used.
Packages (11) boost-1.60.0-2 boost-libs-1.60.0-2 cmake-3.4.2-1
confuse-2.8-1 dhcpcd-6.10.1-1
libvpx-1.5.0-4 ntp-4.2.8.p6-1 openmpi-1.10.2-1
pacman-mirrorlist-20160124-1
> Looks like people tend to forget about updating pacman keyring.
>
> pacman-key --refresh-keys
huh, now what?
# pacman-key --refresh-keys
gpg: refreshing 85 keys from hkp://keys.gnupg.net
gpg: keyserver refresh failed: Permission denied
==> ERROR: A specified local key could not be updated f
>
> > Looks like people tend to forget about updating pacman keyring.
> >
> > pacman-key --refresh-keys
>
> is'n this done automatically? should it?
>
I personally can't see how it (an upgrade hook in a package) could. The
pacman-keyring package can (and does) do some maintenance operations on
It is in testing; updating the keyring pkg from testing fixed the issue on my
box.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Hey,
> Also as for rejecting invalid DKIM mails: People should really not do
> that unless DMARC tells them to.
That _is_ a problem already and will get worse this year. Yahoo has
already published a "reject invalid" policy nearly two years
ago[1]. See:
[0 mosu@sweet-chili ~] host -t txt _dmarc.
>> I'm receiving message about unknown trust while trying to install the confuse
>> package.
>>
>
> Looks like people tend to forget about updating pacman keyring.
>
> pacman-key --refresh-keys
is'n this done automatically? should it?
--
damjan
On Monday, 25 January 2016 09:00:43 IST Bruno Pagani wrote:
> Is there somewhere on the wiki, especially beginner guide or install one
> where it’s advised to do this on a regular basis? (I’m on mobile right now,
> not easy to check)
I found this [1], which suggests that the changes should be upda
Le 25 janvier 2016 03:23:25 GMT+01:00, Levente Polyak
a écrit :
>On 01/25/2016 03:17 AM, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm receiving message about unknown trust while trying to install the
>confuse
>> package.
>>
>
>
>Looks like people tend to forget about updating pacman keyring.
>
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
