Okay.
Just uninstalled flashplugin (really should never have installed anyway).
can always try gnash later, but I'll try without to see how it goes.
Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Jens Adam wrote:
> > freshplayerplugin
>
> Just to nitpick: even if it's more current (feature-wise) th
On 15/07/15 07:38 PM, Jens Adam wrote:
>> freshplayerplugin
>
> Just to nitpick: even if it's more current (feature-wise) than
> standard Adobe Linux 11.2 flashplugin, it's still Adobe Flash and
> thus just as problematic regarding its security.
>
> --byte
PPAPI Flash runs in a strong sandbox i
> freshplayerplugin
Just to nitpick: even if it's more current (feature-wise) than
standard Adobe Linux 11.2 flashplugin, it's still Adobe Flash and
thus just as problematic regarding its security.
--byte
pgpVf4SvF4waS.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
On 16.07.2015 01:22, D C wrote:
> I've actually posted a thread on the forums about this. For youtube you can
> just use HTML5.
To my best knowledge, it depends on the video / the compression
algorithm used. For some videos on YouTube HTML5 works just fine, for
some Videos you still need Flash.
I've actually posted a thread on the forums about this. For youtube you can
just use HTML5. If you require flash there are alternatives: gnash,
lightspark, freshplayerplugin-git, shumway, etc...
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Run:
> - Arch linux 64-bit
> -
Hello!
Run:
- Arch linux 64-bit
- 4.0.7-2-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 30 07:50:21 UTC 2015 x86_64 GNU/Linux
- Firefox 39.0-1
- flashplugin 11.2.202.481-1 (Install Date : Wed 08 Jul 2015)
What is best practice about the current flash vulnerabilites? Just
uninstall flashplugin? Can live with
6 matches
Mail list logo
