On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:19:25PM -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst <
> sebastiaanlokho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2015-04-28 18:50 GMT+02:00 Magnus Therning :
> >
> > > I have a large set of already packages (300+) that I'd like to make
> > > some
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:18:12PM +0200, Sebastiaan Lokhorst wrote:
> 2015-04-28 18:50 GMT+02:00 Magnus Therning :
>
> > I have a large set of already packages (300+) that I'd like to make
> > some minor modifications to the meta data in. Since it takes a few
> > hours to build them all I'd pref
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst <
sebastiaanlokho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-04-28 18:50 GMT+02:00 Magnus Therning :
>
> > I have a large set of already packages (300+) that I'd like to make
> > some minor modifications to the meta data in. Since it takes a few
> > hours to
On 28-04-2015 21:39, Guus Snijders wrote:
> Op 28 apr. 2015 21:04 schreef "Bardur Arantsson" :
>>
>> On 28-04-2015 20:39, Daniel Micay wrote:
People forget vi(1) is part of POSIX so required on "systems that both
support the User Portability Utilities option and define the
POSIX2_CHA
Op 28 apr. 2015 21:04 schreef "Bardur Arantsson" :
>
> On 28-04-2015 20:39, Daniel Micay wrote:
> >> People forget vi(1) is part of POSIX so required on "systems that both
> >> support the User Portability Utilities option and define the
> >> POSIX2_CHAR_TERM symbol." [
http://pubs.opengroup.org/o
On 28-04-2015 20:39, Daniel Micay wrote:
>> People forget vi(1) is part of POSIX so required on "systems that both
>> support the User Portability Utilities option and define the
>> POSIX2_CHAR_TERM symbol." [http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
>> ]
>>
>> The former is probably a good
> People forget vi(1) is part of POSIX so required on "systems that both
> support the User Portability Utilities option and define the
> POSIX2_CHAR_TERM symbol." [http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
> ]
>
> The former is probably a good idea, seeing as the User Portability
> Utilit
thanks :)
It's only ONE damn tool to make all users happy. And some of them bad,
because wpa_supplicant has some vulnerabilities.
But its only one tool, everything you forgot to install on the live
medium can installed afterwards, but not wpa_supplicant or other missing
network tools.
cheers
On
And wpa_supplicant is an opt-depend of netctl, but maybe it should
indicate it's needed for X802.1x as it currently only says it's for
wireless networking.
--
GPG Key: 8387FCC3
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Paladin wrote:
> On , LoneVVolf wrote:
>> Given that dhcpcd & iproute2 are already in
On , LoneVVolf wrote:
> Given that dhcpcd & iproute2 are already in the base group, wired networking
> is already supported by
> installing base.
Technical note: It's not enough on all wired networks, X802.1x needs
wpa_supplicant. I forget it almost always I reinstall one of my
machines..
P.
--
2015-04-28 18:50 GMT+02:00 Magnus Therning :
> I have a large set of already packages (300+) that I'd like to make
> some minor modifications to the meta data in. Since it takes a few
> hours to build them all I'd prefer to avoid dong that. So, is there
> a tool out there that allows me to make
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Sam Stuewe
wrote:
> This may just be my personal opinion, but I have always thought that
> `base` was supposed to be the absolute bare minimum to have a bootable
> installation. From that view, it makes sense that a few very small
> editors made sense in `base` ba
I have a large set of already packages (300+) that I'd like to make
some minor modifications to the meta data in. Since it takes a few
hours to build them all I'd prefer to avoid dong that. So, is there
a tool out there that allows me to make some minor changes to the meta
data of a package?
To
On 28-04-15 16:35, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
I'll reserve my opinions on including wpa_supplicant in base, but I feel
that it at least deserves a mention in the Arch Installation Guide. It's
strange to me that the installer has better networking support than the
base system. I've installed Arch on 5
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015, at 07:13, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> On 28 April 2015 at 05:21, H8H wrote:
> > Don't get me wrong, but it is annoying to configure the whole wirless
> > stuff and netctl just said, STOP! There is ONE missing dependency:
> > wpa_supplicant. ONLY ONE PACKAGE I MISSED TO REACH
On 28 April 2015 at 05:21, H8H wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, but it is annoying to configure the whole wirless
> stuff and netctl just said, STOP! There is ONE missing dependency:
> wpa_supplicant. ONLY ONE PACKAGE I MISSED TO REACH THE WORLD :-(
You are given the freedom to choose what to install
16 matches
Mail list logo
