Re: [arch-general] Pacman for user-only packages

2015-04-13 Thread Mark Lee
On Monday, April 13, 2015 07:07:35 PM William Hatch wrote: > Hello, > > I've been an Arch user for years now because pacman is my favorite package > manager. However, I've been working at a job for almost a year now where I > use a RHEL machine without root access. They let me use whatever softw

[arch-general] Pacman for user-only packages

2015-04-13 Thread William Hatch
Hello, I've been an Arch user for years now because pacman is my favorite package manager. However, I've been working at a job for almost a year now where I use a RHEL machine without root access. They let me use whatever software I want, but I have to build it all from source and install it in

[arch-general] opal package out of date for long

2015-04-13 Thread Michał Zegan
Hello. It seems that the package opal is out of date, and marked such for a year without it being updated. The current version in arch is 3.10.3, the newest is 3.14.3, if I remember correctly. Any suggestions about what to do in this case? I'm not sure if such mails belong to this list or not.

Re: [arch-general] arch linux install iso problem

2015-04-13 Thread Jeremy O'Brien
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 17:36, Mauro Santos wrote: > On 13-04-2015 21:55, Jeremy O'Brien wrote: > > Join the club of Brasero haters. That issue existed at least 2-3 years > > ago when I used it last. Incredible. > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 16:42, Francis Gerund wrote: > >> Well, I'll be [dar

Re: [arch-general] arch linux install iso problem

2015-04-13 Thread Mauro Santos
On 13-04-2015 21:55, Jeremy O'Brien wrote: > Join the club of Brasero haters. That issue existed at least 2-3 years > ago when I used it last. Incredible. > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 16:42, Francis Gerund wrote: >> Well, I'll be [darned]! >> >> Burned another cd manually, using wodim, then verifi

Re: [arch-general] arch linux install iso problem

2015-04-13 Thread Jeremy O'Brien
Join the club of Brasero haters. That issue existed at least 2-3 years ago when I used it last. Incredible. On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 16:42, Francis Gerund wrote: > Well, I'll be [darned]! > > Burned another cd manually, using wodim, then verified it, as per the > website. > > It worked. > > So

Re: [arch-general] arch linux install iso problem

2015-04-13 Thread Francis Gerund
Well, I'll be [darned]! Burned another cd manually, using wodim, then verified it, as per the website. It worked. So it does seem to be a problem with Brasero, after all. Thanks guys. On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Mark Lee wrote: > On Monday, April 13, 2015 02:28:00 PM Francis Gerund wr

Re: [arch-general] arch linux install iso problem

2015-04-13 Thread Mark Lee
On Monday, April 13, 2015 02:28:00 PM Francis Gerund wrote: > When I do: > > file > /run/media/default/USBHD005/New_stuff/Archlinux/archlinux-2015.04.01-dual.is > o > > I get: > > archlinux-2015.04.01-dual.iso: # ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data > 'ARCH_201504 ' (bootable) >

Re: [arch-general] arch linux install iso problem

2015-04-13 Thread Francis Gerund
When I do: file /run/media/default/USBHD005/New_stuff/Archlinux/archlinux-2015.04.01-dual.iso I get: archlinux-2015.04.01-dual.iso: # ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data 'ARCH_201504 ' (bootable) On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote: > > :: Triggering ue

Re: [arch-general] arch linux install iso problem

2015-04-13 Thread Damjan Georgievski
> :: Triggering uevents . . . > ... blk_update request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 1226572 > ... blk_update request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 1226572 > ... Buffer I/O error on dev sr0, logical block 153344, async page read > :: Mounting '/dev/disk/by-label/ARCH_201504' ^@ERROR: device did not sho

Re: [arch-general] arch linux install iso problem

2015-04-13 Thread Jeremy O'Brien
This is gonna sound silly, but try using something other than Brasero, like cdw or bashburn. I've had Brasero burn corrupt CDs for me in the past when the commandline tools worked fine, and ever since then I refuse to use it. On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 14:55, Francis Gerund wrote: > Forgot to say, I

Re: [arch-general] arch linux install iso problem

2015-04-13 Thread Francis Gerund
Forgot to say, I tried again, using a different 64-bit computer. Same exact results! On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Francis Gerund wrote: > Hello. > > I downloaded the most recent arch linux dual-boot install iso (from > 2015-04-01). > - checked it with md5 and sha1 against checksums from t

[arch-general] arch linux install iso problem

2015-04-13 Thread Francis Gerund
Hello. I downloaded the most recent arch linux dual-boot install iso (from 2015-04-01). - checked it with md5 and sha1 against checksums from the website. Also did gpg verify. All okay. - burned to cd using Brasero. Verified cd from within Brasero. Okay. - verified by loop mounting, per websit

Re: [arch-general] Why does network interface sometimes change name?

2015-04-13 Thread Felix E. Klee
After a reboot (due to BSOD in the Windows host - faulty RAM) the interface name changed from eth0 to eno1636: $ ifconfig eno1636 eno1636: flags=4163 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.101.129 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.101.255 inet6 fe80::7e13:1a20:5

Re: [arch-general] libicuuc.so.54: cannot open shared object

2015-04-13 Thread arnaud gaboury
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Armin K. wrote: > On 13.4.2015 11:29, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> >> gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ % R >> /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R: error while loading shared libraries: >> libicuuc.so.54: cannot open shared object file: No such file or >> directory >> >> gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ %

Re: [arch-general] libicuuc.so.54: cannot open shared object

2015-04-13 Thread Delcypher
> libicu.so.55 just hit [extra], but I can't see R depending on icu so > maybe it has some plugin which requires icu which you need to rebuild? If you run the following $ LD_DEBUG=all ld /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R You should be able to figure out which library that R links with that needs icu (i.e.

Re: [arch-general] libicuuc.so.54: cannot open shared object

2015-04-13 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 04/13/15 at 11:31am, Armin K. wrote: > On 13.4.2015 11:29, arnaud gaboury wrote: > >gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ % R > >/usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R: error while loading shared libraries: > >libicuuc.so.54: cannot open shared object file: No such file or > >directory > > > >gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ % mypac icu > >

Re: [arch-general] libicuuc.so.54: cannot open shared object

2015-04-13 Thread arnaud gaboury
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:29 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ % R > /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R: error while loading shared libraries: > libicuuc.so.54: cannot open shared object file: No such file or > directory > > gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ % mypac icu > 306:icu 55.1-1 > 386:lib32-icu 54.1

Re: [arch-general] libicuuc.so.54: cannot open shared object

2015-04-13 Thread Armin K.
On 13.4.2015 11:29, arnaud gaboury wrote: gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ % R /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R: error while loading shared libraries: libicuuc.so.54: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ % mypac icu 306:icu 55.1-1 386:lib32-icu 54.1-1 gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ % ls

[arch-general] libicuuc.so.54: cannot open shared object

2015-04-13 Thread arnaud gaboury
gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ % R /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R: error while loading shared libraries: libicuuc.so.54: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ % mypac icu 306:icu 55.1-1 386:lib32-icu 54.1-1 gabx@hortensia ➤➤ ~ % ls -al /usr/lib32/libicuio.so.54 lrwxrwxrwx 1

[arch-general] linux 4.0 in [testing]

2015-04-13 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Hi, just released 4.0 kernel to [testing] repository. - nvidia-304xx - nvidia-340xx - r8169 modules do not build. Please take a look at it. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc