Re: [arch-general] filesystem update

2015-02-24 Thread Aaron Caffrey
On 24/02/15 at 10:12pm, Simon Hanna wrote: Hi, the latest filesystem package now owns /home my /home used to be a symlink to some other location, so the upgrade failed. I "fixed" it for now by just linking my home folder into /home (since I'm running a single user setup it's fine) However I'm c

Re: [arch-general] filesystem update

2015-02-24 Thread Mike Cloaked
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Simon Hanna wrote: > Hi, > > the latest filesystem package now owns /home > my /home used to be a symlink to some other location, so the upgrade > failed. > I "fixed" it for now by just linking my home folder into /home (since I'm > running a single user setup it'

[arch-general] filesystem update

2015-02-24 Thread Simon Hanna
Hi, the latest filesystem package now owns /home my /home used to be a symlink to some other location, so the upgrade failed. I "fixed" it for now by just linking my home folder into /home (since I'm running a single user setup it's fine) However I'm curious whether the directory should be left a

Re: [arch-general] Bad md5sum or bad download for archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso

2015-02-24 Thread Rodrigo Rivas
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 7:01 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > I repeated the rm/rsync again and while the size reported is the exact > correct number of bytes, the checksum is again wrong: > > 2832de308651f77df753b5a5977431c0 archlinux-2015.02.01-dual.iso > > Is there anything other than hardware