Re: [arch-general] postgresql 9.3 -> 9.4

2015-01-28 Thread Troy Engel
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Patrick Burroughs wrote: > > I agree, and a message from pacman as I've multiply stated should be in > place seems perfectly sufficient notification to me — you DO read all > your messages from pacman, don't you? Please keep your passive aggressive personal attack

Re: [arch-general] postgresql 9.3 -> 9.4

2015-01-28 Thread Celti
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:08:47 -0600 Troy Engel wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Patrick Burroughs > wrote: > > > > They ARE routine, though. When dealing with databases anything more > > Respectfully, they are not routine for what's being discussed. Perhaps we're running into semantic

Re: [arch-general] postgresql 9.3 -> 9.4

2015-01-28 Thread Troy Engel
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Patrick Burroughs wrote: > > They ARE routine, though. When dealing with databases anything more Respectfully, they are not routine for what's being discussed. The vendor themselves packages the binaries for each release into separate packaged versions, with each

Re: [arch-general] postgresql 9.3 -> 9.4

2015-01-28 Thread Celti
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:25:48 -0800 Andrej Podzimek wrote: > Well, version changes that require a non-trivial manual intervention > are certainly not "routine". There have been many bugfix version > updates of PostgreSQL that required no action at all. Those would > definitely qualify as "routine"

Re: [arch-general] postgresql 9.3 -> 9.4

2015-01-28 Thread Andrej Podzimek
Next time reading pacman -Syu output before hitting Y would be even nicer. ;-) You know what, sometimes their is just so much on the screen to catch all the messages for things like this. I was hit with the same problem and had a server down for almost a day. This should have been posted on th

Re: [arch-general] postgresql 9.3 -> 9.4

2015-01-28 Thread Celti
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:54:17 -0700 Squall Lionheart wrote: > > Next time reading pacman -Syu output before hitting Y would be even > > nicer. ;-) > > You know what, sometimes their is just so much on the screen to catch > all the messages for things like this. I was hit with the same > problem a

Re: [arch-general] postgresql 9.3 -> 9.4

2015-01-28 Thread Squall Lionheart
> > Next time reading pacman -Syu output before hitting Y would be even nicer. > ;-) You know what, sometimes their is just so much on the screen to catch all the messages for things like this. I was hit with the same problem and had a server down for almost a day. This should have been posted

Re: [arch-general] postgresql 9.3 -> 9.4

2015-01-28 Thread Damian Nowak
> Next time a heads up would be nice, so I know I have to dump and restore > beforehand. Next time reading pacman -Syu output before hitting Y would be even nicer. ;-) I use IgnorePkg for postgresql and postgresql-libs on my servers. -- -Nowaker www.virtkick.io

[arch-general] postgresql 9.3 -> 9.4

2015-01-28 Thread Georg Altmann
Hi, There was nothing mentioning a minor realease upgrade or did I miss something? Next time a heads up would be nice, so I know I have to dump and restore beforehand. Thanks! Georg -- PGP-Key: 0x1E320E65 D150 7783 A0D1 7507 1266 C5B3 BBF1 9C42 1E32 0E65 I don't like the idea of secret agen