Re: [arch-general] warning: foobar: local (1.0.0-2) is newer than community (1.0.0-1)

2015-01-17 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:40:51 +0600, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > On 17 January 2015 at 18:23, Jan Alexander Steffens > wrote: > > Resetting the pkgrel is indeed wrong. pkgrel should be bumped when > > moving to [community], and that has been my habit when moving > > packages from the AUR. > > I agr

Re: [arch-general] warning: foobar: local (1.0.0-2) is newer than community (1.0.0-1)

2015-01-17 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 17 January 2015 at 18:23, Jan Alexander Steffens wrote: > Resetting the pkgrel is indeed wrong. pkgrel should be bumped when > moving to [community], and that has been my habit when moving packages > from the AUR. I agree. Even I used to be guilty. Although this is not AFAIK documented anywher

Re: [arch-general] KDE Applications 14.12

2015-01-17 Thread phanisvar das
On Friday 16 Jan 2015 00:24:50 Felix Yan wrote: > Sorry for the delay on update. I am preparing the 14.12.1 release, so > you will see more packages coming into [testing] in the following day. > I will also adopt some packages I use in the mean time. > > Hope this make things more clear for me t

Re: [arch-general] warning: foobar: local (1.0.0-2) is newer than community (1.0.0-1)

2015-01-17 Thread Jan Alexander Steffens
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Regarding to my AUR cache [1], it seems to be common practise, that > packages that moved from AUR to community get a lower "pkgrel="-value. > IMO that is very annoying and doesn't make sense. I don't want to > reinstall software that does wo

Re: [arch-general] warning: foobar: local (1.0.0-2) is newer than community (1.0.0-1)

2015-01-17 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 12:59:20 +0100, Alexandre Ferrando wrote: > On 17 January 2015 at 12:19, Ralf Mardorf > wrote: > > > Regarding to my AUR cache [1], it seems to be common practise, that > > packages that moved from AUR to community get a lower > > "pkgrel="-value. IMO that is very annoying and

Re: [arch-general] warning: foobar: local (1.0.0-2) is newer than community (1.0.0-1)

2015-01-17 Thread Alexandre Ferrando
On 17 January 2015 at 12:19, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Regarding to my AUR cache [1], it seems to be common practise, that > packages that moved from AUR to community get a lower "pkgrel="-value. > IMO that is very annoying and doesn't make sense. I don't want to > reinstall software that does work a

[arch-general] warning: foobar: local (1.0.0-2) is newer than community (1.0.0-1)

2015-01-17 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Regarding to my AUR cache [1], it seems to be common practise, that packages that moved from AUR to community get a lower "pkgrel="-value. IMO that is very annoying and doesn't make sense. I don't want to reinstall software that does work and I dislike to get tons of warnings. Why is this the commo