Re: [arch-general] What's the holdup on Linux 3.18?

2015-01-07 Thread Mark Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/07/15 19:00, Mark Lee wrote: > Salutations, > > I was wondering what's the holdup on Linux 3.18. It's been in > testing since 12/11/2014. > > Regards, Mark > I mean 12/17/2014. Regards, Mark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

[arch-general] What's the holdup on Linux 3.18?

2015-01-07 Thread Mark Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Salutations, I was wondering what's the holdup on Linux 3.18. It's been in testing since 12/11/2014. Regards, Mark -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlStyJsACgkQZ/Z80n6+J/bClAD9EiTNL00Aq6T4JyR+T447j4Ke WpaeU2jAqEkyudP4Xiw

Re: [arch-general] Is there a non file manager daemon for automounting like the ones provided by "pcmanfm -d"

2015-01-07 Thread Javier Vasquez
> Another vote for udiskie. Python based, but works. > >> >> Im using udiskie with awesom WM. Im not sure if thats what youre searching >> for, but it shows what device is mounted & allows to unmount these. Im even >> more uncertain about what you meant by that: "Seems to be something to >> automou

Re: [arch-general] Is there a non file manager daemon for automounting like the ones provided by "pcmanfm -d"

2015-01-07 Thread Javier Vasquez
> If you don't mind pulling gjs as a dependency, I have two simple scripts at > https://bitbucket.org/XeCycle/gjs-mount. The scripts are trivial; seems not > hard to rewrite in C or Vala, to eliminate this dependency, but I have not > the time. Looks similar to pmount. Which is good, except it l

Re: [arch-general] Is there a non file manager daemon for automounting like the ones provided by "pcmanfm -d"

2015-01-07 Thread Javier Vasquez
> I believe it's possible to mount with systemd (I haven't tried this yet). > > It should be able to automatically mount drives you've written the unit files > for, but I don't know about automatic mounting (hot-swapping USB drives, > etc.). > -- > vixsomnis Oh, yes it's, but actually I prefer a

Re: [arch-general] Standard group for "hardware user"?

2015-01-07 Thread mustermann, max
Hello, im not sure how useful this advice is, but have you considered to ask on the archbsd mainlinglist? I dont know if they're using udev, mdev or another thing, but may they have some tips for that. regards, Am 2015-01-07 10:09, schrieb Tobias Hunger: Hi Neale, The packages in arch ar

Re: [arch-general] Standard group for "hardware user"?

2015-01-07 Thread Tobias Hunger
Hi Neale, The packages in arch are built with the systemd security model in mind. You are changing that pretty fundamental assumption by ripping out systemd, logind & co. and that will have an effect on the overall security of your system. At least give the packages a chance to respond to that cha