On 2014-11-19 23:22, "P. A. López-Valencia" wrote:
>
> On 19/11/14 16:54, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> >
> >This is interesting. Do you mean synchronizing via NTP protocol?
> >
> >My experience from this laptop is that the RTC quickly becomes desynchronized
> >at times when I am not able to sync via Ope
On 19/11/14 16:54, Rasmus Liland wrote:
This is interesting. Do you mean synchronizing via NTP protocol?
My experience from this laptop is that the RTC quickly becomes desynchronized
at times when I am not able to sync via OpenNTPd, i.e. when I am not
connected to the internet.
If so, don't
On 2014-11-19 21:48, vixsomnis wrote:
> On November 19, 2014 3:40:38 PM EST, Mark Lee wrote:
> >On 11/19/2014 12:15 PM, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> >> On 2014-11-17 00:19, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> >>> On 2014-11-15 18:28, Mark Lee wrote:
> On 11/15/2014 12:20 PM, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> > On 2014
On 2014-11-19 21:41, Mark Lee wrote:
> On 11/19/2014 12:15 PM, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> > On 2014-11-17 00:19, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> >> On 2014-11-15 18:28, Mark Lee wrote:
> >>> On 11/15/2014 12:20 PM, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> On 2014-11-15 15:21, LoneVVolf wrote:
> > On 15-11-14 06:57, Rasm
On November 19, 2014 3:40:38 PM EST, Mark Lee wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>On 11/19/2014 12:15 PM, Rasmus Liland wrote:
>> On 2014-11-17 00:19, Rasmus Liland wrote:
>>> On 2014-11-15 18:28, Mark Lee wrote:
On 11/15/2014 12:20 PM, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> On 20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/19/2014 12:15 PM, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> On 2014-11-17 00:19, Rasmus Liland wrote:
>> On 2014-11-15 18:28, Mark Lee wrote:
>>> On 11/15/2014 12:20 PM, Rasmus Liland wrote:
On 2014-11-15 15:21, LoneVVolf wrote:
> On 15-11-14 06:57, Rasm
On 2014-11-17 00:19, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> On 2014-11-15 18:28, Mark Lee wrote:
> >On 11/15/2014 12:20 PM, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> >> On 2014-11-15 15:21, LoneVVolf wrote:
> >>> On 15-11-14 06:57, Rasmus Liland wrote:
> On 2014-11-15 06:10, Mark Lee wrote:
> > On 11/14/2014 10:29 PM, Rasmu
It's a bit like trying to make cat more high tech, I think. It misses the point.
--
vixsomnis
On November 19, 2014 8:59:10 AM EST, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:51:11 +0100
>Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf
>> wrote:
>> > I installed procps-
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:51:11 +0100
Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
> > I installed procps-ng-classic, but this alone didn't bring back the
> > old useful top, I needed to remove ~/.toprc too and now the
> > resource hungriest process is shown again.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:54:42 +0100
> Michael Alt wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Vladimir Nikšić
>> wrote:
>> > I noticed that after a last "$pacman -Syu" that I got a pretty
>> > different version of the utility top in the packag
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:54:42 +0100
Michael Alt wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Vladimir Nikšić
> wrote:
> > I noticed that after a last "$pacman -Syu" that I got a pretty
> > different version of the utility top in the package procps-ng. What
> > exactly happened, how can I get the old-
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michael Alt wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Vladimir Nikšić wrote:
>> I noticed that after a last "$pacman -Syu" that I got a pretty different
>> version of the utility top in the package procps-ng. What exactly happened,
>> how can I get the old-style o
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Vladimir Nikšić wrote:
> I noticed that after a last "$pacman -Syu" that I got a pretty different
> version of the utility top in the package procps-ng. What exactly happened,
> how can I get the old-style one back?
>
> Thanks. :)
Hi,
look here: https://bbs.archl
I noticed that after a last "$pacman -Syu" that I got a pretty different
version of the utility top in the package procps-ng. What exactly
happened, how can I get the old-style one back?
Thanks. :)
14 matches
Mail list logo
