Hi,
after update to kernel 3.13, xbacklight fails to adjust the brightness
on my Asus EeePc 1015 PX; anyone in the same boat?
echoing a number into:
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness
updates the value as expected, only it doesn't really do anything.
Fell bac
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:24:39 +0100
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 20.02.2014 17:33, schrieb Dave Reisner:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm working on packaging the systemd 209 release, and I expect to have
> > pkgrel=1 into [testing] in a few hours, barring any unforseen problems.
> > It's a huge release (ne
Hi
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Genes Lists wrote:
>
>
> To be sure I rebopted - and still have same problem - no suspend on lid
> close - logs just say lid close / lid open as before. so the event is
> recognized but no suspend.
>
> Anything else I can try short of going back to systemd 208?
One final piece of info - with systemd 209 the KDE menu under 'leave' is
missing sleep/hibernate buttons. Putting back 208, the buttons come back.
To be sure I rebopted - and still have same problem - no suspend on lid
close - logs just say lid close / lid open as before. so the event is
recognized but no suspend.
Anything else I can try short of going back to systemd 208?
On 02/21/2014 11:40 AM, Genes Lists wrote:
On 02/21/2014 11:30 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
HandleLidSwitch=suspend
LidSwitchIgnoreInhibited=no
This means that logind will initiate a suspend on LID closed *except*
when something inhibits it - for example, KDE inhibits logind from
suspending.
On 02/21/2014 11:30 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
HandleLidSwitch=suspend
LidSwitchIgnoreInhibited=no
This means that logind will initiate a suspend on LID closed *except*
when something inhibits it - for example, KDE inhibits logind from
suspending.
Thanks I meant to put LidSwitchIgnoreInhi
Am 21.02.2014 17:16, schrieb Genes Lists:
> My /etc/systemd/logind.conf has this:
>
> HandleLidSwitch=ignore
> LidSwitchIgnoreInhibited=no
This would require your desktop (KDE for example) to react on the LID
closing.
> which USED to be required - I now wonder if this should be changed to:
>
>
On 02/21/2014 04:24 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 20.02.2014 17:33, schrieb Dave Reisner:
Hi all,
I'm working on packaging the systemd 209 release, and I expect to have
pkgrel=1 into [testing] in a few hours, barring any unforseen problems.
It's a huge release (nearly 2000 commits since 208), an
9 matches
Mail list logo