Re: [arch-general] apache 2.4

2013-12-03 Thread Allan McRae
On 04/12/13 14:49, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi > >> Exactly. AFAIK, we have no-one interested in maintaining apache-2.4. >> I'm sure we could have apache22 and apache (2.4) otherwise. > > If no-one from core developers wants to maintain this package could > you please move apache and modules to c

Re: [arch-general] apache 2.4

2013-12-03 Thread Anatol Pomozov
Hi > Exactly. AFAIK, we have no-one interested in maintaining apache-2.4. > I'm sure we could have apache22 and apache (2.4) otherwise. If no-one from core developers wants to maintain this package could you please move apache and modules to community repo? There are TU who will help to maintain

Re: [arch-general] apache 2.4

2013-12-03 Thread Allan McRae
On 04/12/13 07:59, Karol Babioch wrote: > Hi, > > Am 03.12.2013 16:37, schrieb David C. Rankin: >> The 2.2->2.4 update represents a "major" update to crucial parts of apache >> including: > > This is exactly the reason why the new version should be provided by > Arch itself and not some "third-pa

Re: [arch-general] arch rollback machine

2013-12-03 Thread ProgAndy
Am Di 03 Dez 2013 10:36:16 CET schrieb archli...@jelmail.com: On 03/12/13 02:09, Gaetan Bisson wrote: [2013-12-02 23:55:29 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer: Ok, you want a fake db files with all versions of the same package. No, he just wants a directory with every version of each package in it. He

Re: [arch-general] dpms in text mode worked 1st boot, now monitor blanks but won't power off

2013-12-03 Thread David C. Rankin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/03/2013 12:51 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: > I use 'consoleblank=' kernel parameter to set the delay. See also > ArchWiki page: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Display_Power_Management_Signaling#DPMS_interaction_in_a_Linux_console_with_sett

Re: [arch-general] arch rollback machine

2013-12-03 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 03/12/2013 10:36, archli...@jelmail.com wrote: > On 03/12/13 02:09, Gaetan Bisson wrote: >> [2013-12-02 23:55:29 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer: >>> Ok, you want a fake db files with all versions of the same package. >> No, he just wants a directory with every version of each package in it. >> He w

Re: [arch-general] apache 2.4

2013-12-03 Thread Karol Babioch
Hi, Am 03.12.2013 16:37, schrieb David C. Rankin: > The 2.2->2.4 update represents a "major" update to crucial parts of apache > including: This is exactly the reason why the new version should be provided by Arch itself and not some "third-party" AUR packages. > For something as fundamental to

Re: [arch-general] apache 2.4

2013-12-03 Thread Nowaker
For something as fundamental to server operations as apache, Arch should continue to provide 2.2 as the core package while providing 2.4 in testing for an extended period. This sounds very Debianish. I haven't seen the same approach for any other package in Arch Linux. Please correct me if I

Re: [arch-general] apache 2.4

2013-12-03 Thread William Giokas
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:37:19AM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 12/02/2013 04:43 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > > What I am trying to say is that keeping software up-to-date is one of > > the main maintainer's responsibilities. Especially in Arch Linux that > > "strives to stay bleeding edge, an

Re: [arch-general] dpms in text mode worked 1st boot, now monitor blanks but won't power off

2013-12-03 Thread Jakub Klinkovský
On 03.12.13 at 8:18, David C. Rankin wrote: > Guys, > > On my 1st boot after install of a new Arch box, the monitor would go to > sleep > in text mode. (monitor power light goes to yellow indicating sleep and screen > goes black (off), not just blank) I thought that was a great trick, since >

Re: [arch-general] [BUG]terminus-font

2013-12-03 Thread John Davis
Hello Gaetan, Thank you. That was the fix. John -- John F. Davis 6 Kandes Court Durham, NC 27713 919-888-8358 独树一帜

Re: [arch-general] [BUG]terminus-font

2013-12-03 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2013-12-03 07:49:15 -0800] John Davis: > I wonder if this is why I have a problem with ncurses output in xterms.? Upgrade to xterm-299, it fixes a regression with line-drawing. If your bug is still not fixed then, file a bug report. -- Gaetan

Re: [arch-general] apache 2.4

2013-12-03 Thread David C. Rankin
On 12/02/2013 04:43 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > What I am trying to say is that keeping software up-to-date is one of > the main maintainer's responsibilities. Especially in Arch Linux that > "strives to stay bleeding edge, and typically offers the latest stable > versions of most software" (quote

[arch-general] dpms in text mode worked 1st boot, now monitor blanks but won't power off

2013-12-03 Thread David C. Rankin
Guys, On my 1st boot after install of a new Arch box, the monitor would go to sleep in text mode. (monitor power light goes to yellow indicating sleep and screen goes black (off), not just blank) I thought that was a great trick, since normally, the screen just blanks, but the monitor doesn't re

Re: [arch-general] arch rollback machine

2013-12-03 Thread archlinux
On 03/12/13 02:09, Gaetan Bisson wrote: [2013-12-02 23:55:29 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer: Ok, you want a fake db files with all versions of the same package. No, he just wants a directory with every version of each package in it. He won't ever update the db (no `pacman -Sy`) but can still insta

Re: [arch-general] [BUG]terminus-font

2013-12-03 Thread John Davis
I wonder if this is why I have a problem with ncurses output in xterms.? Ie. gdb -tui or alsamixer. When I use programs in a virtual terminal/console that use ncurses to draw "gui" they have crisp drawn lines. However if I use the same programs in an xterm all the boxes and lines making the ui ar

Re: [arch-general] [BUG]terminus-font

2013-12-03 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Adopting the bug and the package. Fixing it now. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

Re: [arch-general] libpng 1.6.7 broken?

2013-12-03 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 03.12.2013 12:19, schrieb Simon Perry: > | I think you have three possibilities: > | > | * The image is not generated dynamically but stored in a database. Simply > | update the image with the fixed one. > > Why? Because 1.6.7 can't handle older files? IIRC, newer libpng versions refuse to

Re: [arch-general] libpng 1.6.7 broken?

2013-12-03 Thread Simon Perry
On 03/12/13, Christian Hesse wrote: | > Why does everything else that I listed display it properly though? | | As you already noticed: Because it uses another version of libpng. So there's zero backward-compatbility? Seems unlikely. | I think you have three possibilities: | | * The image is n

Re: [arch-general] libpng 1.6.7 broken?

2013-12-03 Thread Christian Hesse
Simon Perry on Tue, 2013/12/03 21:56: > On 03/12/13, Christian Hesse wrote: > > | I think libpng is right, and the image is broken. You can use pngfix > (which | is part of libpng package) to fix the image: > > Why does everything else that I listed display it properly though? As you already no

Re: [arch-general] libpng 1.6.7 broken?

2013-12-03 Thread Simon Perry
On 03/12/13, Christian Hesse wrote: | I think libpng is right, and the image is broken. You can use pngfix (which | is part of libpng package) to fix the image: Why does everything else that I listed display it properly though? I can't exactly use pngfix on images dynamically generated via a PHP

Re: [arch-general] libpng 1.6.7 broken?

2013-12-03 Thread Christian Hesse
Simon Perry on Tue, 2013/12/03 21:23: > Hi all, > > This following is an example of a thumbnail generated on a forum I help run. > > This image: http://i.imgur.com/XxaSVKa.png > > - Works in Firefox 25.0.1 on Windows 7 > - Works in Chrome 31.0.1650.57 m on Windows 7 > - Works in IE 10 on Win 7

[arch-general] libpng 1.6.7 broken?

2013-12-03 Thread Simon Perry
Hi all, This following is an example of a thumbnail generated on a forum I help run. This image: http://i.imgur.com/XxaSVKa.png - Works in Firefox 25.0.1 on Windows 7 - Works in Chrome 31.0.1650.57 m on Windows 7 - Works in IE 10 on Win 7 - Works in the Win 7 photo viewer - Works in Firefox for