> On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 17:14 -0500, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org
> wrote:
>> On 30/11/2013 17:54, Mark E. Lee wrote:
>>> pool[2129]: segfault at 8 ip 7fbddb60b1b5 sp 7fbd87ffec40
>>> error 4 in libglib-2.0.so.0.3800.2[7fbddb5a8000+fe000]
>>
>> A one line error log is a bit short don
[2013-12-02 23:55:29 +0100] Sébastien Luttringer:
> Ok, you want a fake db files with all versions of the same package.
No, he just wants a directory with every version of each package in it.
He won't ever update the db (no `pacman -Sy`) but can still install any
package he needs with `pacman -S`
--
Mark E. Lee
On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 17:14 -0500, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org
wrote:
> On 30/11/2013 17:54, Mark E. Lee wrote:
> > pool[2129]: segfault at 8 ip 7fbddb60b1b5 sp 7fbd87ffec40
> error
> > 4 in libglib-2.0.so.0.3800.2[7fbddb5a8000+fe000]
>
> A one line error log is a
On 02/12/13 14:51, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 02/12/2013 15:38, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
On 02/12/13 10:52, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all
versions
of the same package in the
The .install file for the package is wrong, making the font unusable
by applications that look on X fontpath.
A bug has been opened since 26 May 2013 with more info and a proposed fix.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/35479
I also sent an email to the maintainer and last packager on November
9th, b
Hi,
I don't really care about Apache specifically but I feel the need to
chime in.
On 12/02/2013 09:06 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:32:13 -0800
Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi,
This situation with apache-2.4 reminds me recent saga with libxml2
update. libxml2 was marked out-of-d
On 02/12/2013 12:14, Don deJuan wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 02:52 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all versions
of the same package in the ARM.
Documentation[1] has been updated
On 02/12/2013 21:05, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
> On 02/12/13 14:51, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On 02/12/2013 15:38, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
>>> On 02/12/13 10:52, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
>> I added a new *packages* tree. Tha
Hi
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:32:13 -0800
> Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This situation with apache-2.4 reminds me recent saga with libxml2
>> update. libxml2 was marked out-of-date for 9 months and maintainer
>> ignored requests about up
Apache 2.2.15 was pushed in 07/2013. This situation hardly qualifies as "lost
interest". If you desperately need 2.4.7 and are absolutely sure that it is
compatible with 2.2 why not just compile it yourself?
We have both Python 2 and Python 3 in official repos.
The same could apply to Apache I b
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:32:13 -0800
Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This situation with apache-2.4 reminds me recent saga with libxml2
> update. libxml2 was marked out-of-date for 9 months and maintainer
> ignored requests about upgrading the package. The only explanation was
> "if maintainer does
Hi,
This situation with apache-2.4 reminds me recent saga with libxml2
update. libxml2 was marked out-of-date for 9 months and maintainer
ignored requests about upgrading the package. The only explanation was
"if maintainer does not upgrade the package there must be a good
reason for it - new vers
On 02/12/13 10:52, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all versions
of the same package in the ARM.
Documentation[1] has been updated.
Hello Sébastien,
It's great that we have ARM again - tha
On 02/12/2013 15:38, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
> On 02/12/13 10:52, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all
versions
of the same package in the ARM.
Documentation[1] has b
On 12/02/2013 02:52 AM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
>>> I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all versions
>>> of the same package in the ARM.
>>> Documentation[1] has been updated.
>>>
>> Hello Sébastien,
>>
>> It's great th
On 02/12/2013 11:12, archli...@jelmail.com wrote:
>
>> I added a new *packages* tree. That offer an easy access to all versions
>> of the same package in the ARM.
>> Documentation[1] has been updated.
>>
> Hello Sébastien,
>
> It's great that we have ARM again - thank you for your good work to
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
