Re: [arch-general] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT1: Unable to dock! (ThinkPad X230/KDE)

2013-07-21 Thread Martti Kühne
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:34 PM, mert <472114...@qq.com> wrote: > Hi, > I noticed there's alway an 'Unable to dock' error message after suspend > to RAM: > > > Arch kernel: ACPI: Low-level resume complete > Arch kernel: PM: Restoring platform NVS memory > Arch kernel: Enabling non-boot

Re: [arch-general] Archlinux ISO signing

2013-07-21 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2013-07-21 18:56:28 -0400] Leonid Isaev: > Is there a particular reason why the images themselves are signed as > opposed to only their checksum files? For instance, Fedora provides > sha256sums with inline sigs [1], and verifying image checksum + checksum file > signature is _much_ less CPU

[arch-general] Archlinux ISO signing

2013-07-21 Thread Leonid Isaev
Hi, One of the ways to verify an archlinux iso image is via its gpg signature. However, doing this on an atom/geode system with < 1GiB of RAM is definitely not fun. And I suppose it also takes noticeable time to sign, even on an opteron/xeon server. Is there a particular reason why

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux on servers?

2013-07-21 Thread Alexander Diana
On 07/19/2013 08:31 PM, Robert Spahr wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 11:13:08 +0100 > M Saunders wrote: > >> But it'd be interesting to hear from >> people running Arch on production servers, how well it works for them >> and what (if any) problems they've faced. > > Mike, > > As an artist that mak