On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 22:31 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> Let me know if you have any objections to (i) adding this to [extra],
> and/or, (ii) splitting the package like this. CC'ing arch-general if
> anyone who uses the stuff wants to comment (advice and suggestions
> only).
Since I've got se
Hi,
I noticed there's alway an 'Unable to dock' error message after suspend
to RAM:
Arch kernel: ACPI: Low-level resume complete
Arch kernel: PM: Restoring platform NVS memory
Arch kernel: Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
Arch kernel: smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x1
CPU
Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>
> That's incorrect. Only subscribers with a consistent record of
> constructive contributions get whitelisted. And the process is
> completely manual.
>
That's not what this message [1] seems to suggest. Thanks for the
clarification.
> So far you've only posted three tim
Hey folks
I'd like to provide alsa-tools [1] in our repos as it contains some
very useful niche tools for some sound cards (mostly pro audio). It is
presently in the AUR in one form or another. [2]
It comes as one single tarball in terms of sources but the subdirs are
self-contained. I'm leaning
[2013-07-16 15:05:24 +0200] Karol Blazewicz:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 22:03 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> it appears that netcfg is removed again
> >
> > Half-OT:
> > Yes, earlier today there was an update available, now it isn't available
[2013-07-16 13:25:57 +0200] A Rojas:
> why are my messages still moderated?
See below.
> If I understood correctly, when the moderation system was set up the
> idea was that after the first message was accepted the address was
> automatically whitelisted.
That's incorrect. Only subscribers with
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 22:03 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> it appears that netcfg is removed again
>
> Half-OT:
> Yes, earlier today there was an update available, now it isn't available
> anymore. Can I get it from somewhere else? I didn't upda
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 22:03 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> it appears that netcfg is removed again
Half-OT:
Yes, earlier today there was an update available, now it isn't available
anymore. Can I get it from somewhere else? I didn't update this morning
and want to do it now. It's ok that you don't pu
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 11:49 +0200, I wrote:
> If somebody has got a better idea, that does avoid to install linux-rt
> two times, please let me know.
Perhaps someday somebody else does miss the forest for the trees, so
here's the forest I found:
yaourt -aQu linux-rt
does check if there's an upda
A Rojas wrote:
> I thought it was deprecated in favour of netctl. Now it's impossible to
> install the base group, since netctl and netcfg are in conflict.
This has been fixed in the meantime, which takes me to another question: why
are my messages still moderated? If I understood correctly, whe
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 16/07/13 21:59, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, A Rojas wrote:
>>> I thought it was deprecated in favour of netctl. Now it's impossible to
>>> install the base group, since netctl and netcfg are in conflict.
>>>
On 16/07/13 21:59, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, A Rojas wrote:
>> I thought it was deprecated in favour of netctl. Now it's impossible to
>> install the base group, since netctl and netcfg are in conflict.
>>
>
> https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:12 PM, A Rojas wrote:
> I thought it was deprecated in favour of netctl. Now it's impossible to
> install the base group, since netctl and netcfg are in conflict.
>
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2013-July/003809.html
I thought it was deprecated in favour of netctl. Now it's impossible to
install the base group, since netctl and netcfg are in conflict.
14 matches
Mail list logo
