On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Anatol Pomozov
wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> Per discussion in 'pacman-dev' maillist [1] I implemented a tool that tries
> to find Arch out-of-date packages. The tool scans PKGBUILD files is
> /var/abs directory, extracts download url and then tries to probe download
>
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:47 AM, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT
wrote:
>> void testing(void)
>> {
>> #define NR_STRUCT_A (4)
>> struct B* ptr = malloc(sizeof(struct B) + NR_STRUCT_A*sizeof(struct
>> A));
>>
>> ptr->numelem = NR_STRUCT_A;
>> ptr->item= (struct A*)(ptr+1);
>>
>>
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Olivier Langlois
wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 08:52 +0200, Martti Kühne wrote:
>> Sorry if this is OT and a dumb question, but are you sure you want
>>
>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:20 PM, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT
>> wrote:
>> [...]
>> > struct B
>> > {
>> >
> void testing(void)
> {
> #define NR_STRUCT_A (4)
> struct B* ptr = malloc(sizeof(struct B) + NR_STRUCT_A*sizeof(struct
> A));
>
> ptr->numelem = NR_STRUCT_A;
> ptr->item= (struct A*)(ptr+1);
>
> ptr->item[0].a = 0;
> ptr->item[1].a = 1;
> ptr->item[2].a
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Guus Snijders wrote:
> Op 13 mei 2013 21:12 schreef "Jameson" het volgende:
>>
>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Guus Snijders wrote:
>> > So at least one way would be place a script that calls
>> > "/etc/rc.d/libvirtd-guests stop" (or equivalent, it's not hard
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 08:52 +0200, Martti Kühne wrote:
> Sorry if this is OT and a dumb question, but are you sure you want
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:20 PM, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT
> wrote:
> [...]
> > struct B
> > {
> > int numelem;
> > /*
> > * Old C trick to defi
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 04:50 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:49 AM, wrote:
> > If this function initArr() is moved to the same cpp file of main(),
> > all optimization level get the same result.
>
Good observation. Having a separate TU for init function was intentional
On Tuesday 14 May 2013 13:34:41 Joaquin Villanova wrote:
> Hi, I've built Firefox 21 using Firefox 20 PKGBUILD, changing versions
> and reading the README notes on the source tarball, just for try. Should
> i expect any issue when installing? Is this a good method for a general
> purpose upgrading
Hi, I've built Firefox 21 using Firefox 20 PKGBUILD, changing versions
and reading the README notes on the source tarball, just for try. Should
i expect any issue when installing? Is this a good method for a general
purpose upgrading / downgrading?
I mean, I can wait for this package because
Op 13 mei 2013 21:12 schreef "Jameson" het volgende:
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Guus Snijders wrote:
> > So at least one way would be place a script that calls
> > "/etc/rc.d/libvirtd-guests stop" (or equivalent, it's not hard to
replace)
> > in /etc/systemd/system-shutdown/ . My main qu
On 2013-05-14 05:42:04, Daniel Micay wrote:
> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 05:42:04 -0400
> From: Daniel Micay
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] gcc: loop do not terminate
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:02 AM, wrote:
> > On 2013-05-14 04:50:11, Daniel Micay wrote
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:02 AM, wrote:
> On 2013-05-14 04:50:11, Daniel Micay wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 04:50:11 -0400
>> From: Daniel Micay
>> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
>> Subject: Re: [arch-general] gcc: loop do not terminate
>>
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:49 AM, wrot
On 2013-05-14 04:50:11, Daniel Micay wrote:
> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 04:50:11 -0400
> From: Daniel Micay
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] gcc: loop do not terminate
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:49 AM, wrote:
> > If this function initArr() is moved to t
On 2013-05-13 18:20:05, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 18:20:05 +
> From: LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT
> To: "General Discussion about Arch Linux (arch-general@archlinux.org)"
>
> Subject: [arch-general] gcc: loop do not terminate
>
> I have just been hit by somethin
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:49 AM, wrote:
> If this function initArr() is moved to the same cpp file of main(),
> all optimization level get the same result.
That's the great thing about undefined behaviour, you never know what
you'll get. It's really not something anyone should be relying on
On 2013-05-13 18:20:05, LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT wrote:
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 18:20:05 +
> From: LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT
> To: "General Discussion about Arch Linux (arch-general@archlinux.org)"
>
> Subject: [arch-general] gcc: loop do not terminate
>
> I have just been hit by somethin
16 matches
Mail list logo
