Hello,
TeXLive 2012 continuous updates have been frozen for TeXLive 2013 preparation.
I have uploaded updated versions of the TeXLive 2012 packages to
[testing], feel free to report any problems.
Regards,
Rémy.
On 2013-04-18 14:26, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> Emotional comments, like your and Hugo come time to time, usually on
> aur-general, when packages are moved from AUR to community. AUR
> PKGBUILD are _not_ the property of the maintainer (even if he's a good
> guy who drink beer) and sending a mail
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
wrote:
> On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
>> wrote:
> Yes, but they differ from the defaults for no aparent reason.
> For example, since the sysconfdir was different, upo
On 2013-04-18 14:26, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Chris Down wrote:
> > On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
> > I must say I do find it a bit off that a package with a conflicting name
> > wo
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
> I must say I do find it a bit off that a package with a conflicting name would
> be added without even attempting to contact the AUR main
On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
> wrote:
> > One of the problems with the new package in [community], is that it's
> > build configuration differs SO MUCH from the defaults (and my own
> > package), that their settings are in
On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
> > Finally, I'm a bit surprised as to how this happened. I planned to
> > propose to move my own package from AUR to [community] at some point,
> > but not yet, since it only has 7 votes (way l
7 matches
Mail list logo
