Re: [arch-general] gummiboot kernel panic: unable to mount root fs

2013-04-15 Thread David Benfell
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 09:46:46PM +0200, Nelson Marambio wrote: > > Hi, Dennis, > > you didn't forget to replace 'sata pata scsi' etc. by 'block' ? That > was my fault a few months ago shortly before an update of the kernel. > In result, the bootimage couldn't find any harddisk installed. > > M

Re: [arch-general] gpg-agent, ssh keys, and systemd --user

2013-04-15 Thread Robbie Smith
On 15/04/13 19:00, Damien Robert wrote: Robbie Smith wrote in message <5165674e.4080...@gmail.com>: I’ve written the following user service, and it should do the same thing, but it doesn’t seem to work: $ cat ~/.config/systemd/user/gpg-agent.service [Unit] Description=GnuPG private key agent W

Re: [arch-general] gummiboot kernel panic: unable to mount root fs

2013-04-15 Thread Nelson Marambio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 15.04.2013 21:40, schrieb David Benfell: > Hi Dennis, > > On 04/13/2013 08:28 PM, Dennis Anderson wrote: >> Hi David, > >> I have EFI working on an ASUS mobo so maybe I can help. What >> does you arch.conf look like. Sounds lilke that is where t

Re: [arch-general] gpg-agent, ssh keys, and systemd --user

2013-04-15 Thread Damien Robert
Robbie Smith wrote in message <5165674e.4080...@gmail.com>: > I’ve written the following user service, and it should do the same > thing, but it doesn’t seem to work: > > $ cat ~/.config/systemd/user/gpg-agent.service > [Unit] > Description=GnuPG private key agent > Wants=environment.target > Be

Re: [arch-general] gummiboot kernel panic: unable to mount root fs

2013-04-15 Thread David Benfell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dennis, On 04/13/2013 08:28 PM, Dennis Anderson wrote: > Hi David, > > I have EFI working on an ASUS mobo so maybe I can help. What does > you arch.conf look like. Sounds lilke that is where the problems > could be. > Here it is, along with a dir

Re: [arch-general] debug package repositories

2013-04-15 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 15.04.2013 17:40, schrieb William Giokas: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:52:00PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: >> The issues that prevent split packages going across repos are entirely >> different to what is required to keep a separate debug package repo. >> >> In fact, I will provide the needed patc

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [pacman-dev] debug package repositories

2013-04-15 Thread William Giokas
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:52:00PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > The issues that prevent split packages going across repos are entirely > different to what is required to keep a separate debug package repo. > > In fact, I will provide the needed patches for a separate [debug] and > [community-debug]

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [pacman-dev] debug package repositories

2013-04-15 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: > On 15 April 2013 10:52, Allan McRae wrote: >> In fact, I will provide the needed patches for a separate [debug] and >> [community-debug] repo if that is what is decided to happen. > > You have my full support when it comes to having debug

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [pacman-dev] debug package repositories

2013-04-15 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On 15 April 2013 10:52, Allan McRae wrote: > In fact, I will provide the needed patches for a separate [debug] and > [community-debug] repo if that is what is decided to happen. You have my full support when it comes to having debug packages in a separate repository. On 15 April 2013 15:00, Tom

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [pacman-dev] debug package repositories

2013-04-15 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 15 April 2013 17:52, Allan McRae wrote: > In fact, I will provide the needed patches for a separate [debug] and > [community-debug] repo if that is what is decided to happen. I personally think that is the only way to go about it. I wouldn't want -debug packages to take up search output, but I

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [pacman-dev] debug package repositories

2013-04-15 Thread Allan McRae
On 15/04/13 19:46, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: > On 15 April 2013 09:59, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Separate debug repositories won't happen - we can't even put >> split packages into different repositories > > Fair enough. > >> Even if >> the db sizes double, we are still way under 5MB per db, which i

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [pacman-dev] debug package repositories

2013-04-15 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On 15 April 2013 09:59, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Separate debug repositories won't happen - we can't even put > split packages into different repositories Fair enough. > Even if > the db sizes double, we are still way under 5MB per db, which is a > reasonable size considering our users' bandwidth

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [pacman-dev] debug package repositories

2013-04-15 Thread Allan McRae
On 15/04/13 18:59, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 13.04.2013 17:55, schrieb William Giokas: >> All, >> >> With the inclusion of the debug option in pacman 4.1.0, I think it makes >> sense to do something with this in the official repositories. I've >> sifted through some bug reports asking for inclusio

Re: [arch-general] [pacman-dev] debug package repositories

2013-04-15 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 13.04.2013 17:55, schrieb William Giokas: > All, > > With the inclusion of the debug option in pacman 4.1.0, I think it makes > sense to do something with this in the official repositories. I've > sifted through some bug reports asking for inclusion of the debug > symbols in a separate package