On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> Why not keep bind9? ... It has not been abandoned upstream and I see no
> conflicts between bind9 and bind10 - think gtk+2 and gtk+3 ... Both can
> exist on the same system, but I doubt that two bind daemons can run at the
> same time.
I want if
2013/3/20 Tobias Powalowski :
> Am 20.03.2013 17:24, schrieb fredbezies:
>> 2013/3/20 Tobias Powalowski :
>> [...]
>>> Ok -3 isos uploaded hope now everything works. At least md5sums are now
>>> the same as on my system.
>>>
>> All is ok. I was not able to test UEFI boot. But the only last bug I
>>
Am 20.03.2013 17:24, schrieb fredbezies:
> 2013/3/20 Tobias Powalowski :
> [...]
>> Ok -3 isos uploaded hope now everything works. At least md5sums are now
>> the same as on my system.
>>
> All is ok. I was not able to test UEFI boot. But the only last bug I
> saw is that there is no working networ
2013/3/20 Tobias Powalowski :
[...]
>>
> Ok -3 isos uploaded hope now everything works. At least md5sums are now
> the same as on my system.
>
All is ok. I was not able to test UEFI boot. But the only last bug I
saw is that there is no working network on installed system.
I have to do dhcpcd name-
2013/3/20 Tobias Powalowski :
[...]
> Ok -3 isos uploaded hope now everything works. At least md5sums are now
> the same as on my system.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
>
Just waiting to grab them and tell you if it works flawlessly with all
kernels ! :)
--
Frederic Bezies
fredbez...@gmail.com
[2013-03-20 15:44:35 +0100] Armin K.:
> On 03/20/2013 03:39 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> >[2013-03-20 15:14:19 +1100] Gaetan Bisson:
> >>Deprecation of bind and dnsutils
> >
> >I've just moved dnsutils to [extra] and orphaned it as well as bind.
> >This announcement is postponed as long as somebody c
On 03/20/2013 03:39 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2013-03-20 15:14:19 +1100] Gaetan Bisson:
Deprecation of bind and dnsutils
I've just moved dnsutils to [extra] and orphaned it as well as bind.
This announcement is postponed as long as somebody can manage to keep
BIND alive...
Why not keep bind
Am 20.03.2013 08:34, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> Am 19.03.2013 23:24, schrieb fredbezies:
>> Some more infos. Only 32 bits versions seems to be working.
>>
>> I grabbed archlinux-2013.03-2-archboot-x86_64.iso, verified its
>> checksum (which matches), and always I get : "Failed to execute /init"
>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Is there planned support for existing nvidia based dmraid arrays in Arch,
I can only speak for myself, but to the best of my knowledge no Arch
devs use dmraid, and upstream appears to be dead. Based on that I'd
say the best choice would
So, to read that log for humans, 66.96.189.4 is establishing a
connection on port 25, dropping an email to
sche...@schererinvestments.com... next thing, bind tries to resolve
clickme2.click2site.com//IN and fails to connect to the network
with "network unreachable"...
further questions:
- Is p
Am 19.03.2013 23:24, schrieb fredbezies:
> Some more infos. Only 32 bits versions seems to be working.
>
> I grabbed archlinux-2013.03-2-archboot-x86_64.iso, verified its
> checksum (which matches), and always I get : "Failed to execute /init"
> followed "Kernel Panic - not syncing : init not found
11 matches
Mail list logo
