On 01/23/2013 12:46 AM, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:03 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
I'm running the LTS kernel, and VirtualBox has been working fine under it
until recently. However sometime in the last few days (after a recent
upgrade, I'm guessing), I can no longer laun
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:25:16 +0100, Thomas Bächler
wrote:
Am 23.01.2013 11:10, schrieb arnaud gaboury:
Let me clarify a few things.
1- I didn't correctly understand the post from Allan about toolchain,
thus
my brocken update when #pacman - S filesystem
Then why do you use testing?
2- As
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:07 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> I finally managed to finish the upgrade on Archiso by removing
> /mnt/usr/lib64 after I checked #pacman - Qo for each file/symlink. They all
> were not owned by any package.
> Now booting to my system still give me a Kernel panic. Not syncin
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:03 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> I'm running the LTS kernel, and VirtualBox has been working fine under it
> until recently. However sometime in the last few days (after a recent
> upgrade, I'm guessing), I can no longer launch VM's. Apparently vboxnetflt
> is never
On 24/01/13 00:29, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>
>> On 24/01/13 00:08, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>>
>>> My issue maybe comes from the upgrade of glibc 2.17-2 from testing.
>>> I have now /lib --> usr/lib and lib64/ > usr/lib.
>>> /usr/lib64 >
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 24/01/13 00:08, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> >
> > My issue maybe comes from the upgrade of glibc 2.17-2 from testing.
> > I have now /lib --> usr/lib and lib64/ > usr/lib.
> > /usr/lib64 > lib
> >
> > Is this the expected structure aft
On 24/01/13 00:08, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> My issue maybe comes from the upgrade of glibc 2.17-2 from testing.
> I have now /lib --> usr/lib and lib64/ > usr/lib.
> /usr/lib64 > lib
>
> Is this the expected structure after the upgrade ?
>
Yes
Give the complete package list of what w
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:07 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2013 12:04 PM, "Paul Gideon Dann" wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday 23 Jan 2013 10:10:17 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > > Good morning guys,
> > >
> > > Let me clarify a few things.
> > > 1- I didn't correctly understand the post from Al
On Jan 23, 2013 12:04 PM, "Paul Gideon Dann" wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 23 Jan 2013 10:10:17 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > Good morning guys,
> >
> > Let me clarify a few things.
> > 1- I didn't correctly understand the post from Allan about toolchain,
thus
> > my brocken update when #pacman - S filesys
On Wednesday 23 Jan 2013 10:10:17 arnaud gaboury wrote:
> Good morning guys,
>
> Let me clarify a few things.
> 1- I didn't correctly understand the post from Allan about toolchain, thus
> my brocken update when #pacman - S filesystem
> 2- As a newbye, I usually pay lots attention to upgrades an
Am 23.01.2013 11:10, schrieb arnaud gaboury:
> Let me clarify a few things.
> 1- I didn't correctly understand the post from Allan about toolchain, thus
> my brocken update when #pacman - S filesystem
Then why do you use testing?
> 2- As a newbye,
Then why do you use testing?
signature.asc
On Jan 23, 2013 5:20 AM, "Martín Cigorraga" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Jameson wrote:
>
> > On Jan 22, 2013 9:40 PM, "arnaud gaboury"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you for help as my box is my working tool
> >
> >
> O_o
> You should'n do that, you know...
>
> As Jameson said, wh
12 matches
Mail list logo
