Re: [arch-general] systemd and core dumps

2012-12-10 Thread Jan Steffens
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Olivier Langlois wrote: > Apparently core dumps (if enabled) are stored in the systemd journal. > > ~ $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern > |/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-coredump %p %u %g %s %t %e > > systemd-coredumpctl looks nice to use but I am not totally sure yet

Re: [arch-general] systemd and core dumps

2012-12-10 Thread Dave Reisner
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:24:17PM -0500, Olivier Langlois wrote: > Apparently core dumps (if enabled) are stored in the systemd journal. > > ~ $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern > |/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-coredump %p %u %g %s %t %e > > systemd-coredumpctl looks nice to use but I am not total

[arch-general] systemd and core dumps

2012-12-10 Thread Olivier Langlois
Apparently core dumps (if enabled) are stored in the systemd journal. ~ $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern |/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-coredump %p %u %g %s %t %e systemd-coredumpctl looks nice to use but I am not totally sure yet that collecting core dumps in the journal is something that I want

Re: [arch-general] python+pango

2012-12-10 Thread Daniel Micay
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > Hello all, > > Is there a python3 module for pango (as there is one for cairo) ? > > pacman -Ss pango gives me: > > extra/libtiger 0.3.4-3 > A rendering library for Kate streams using Pango and Cairo > extra/pango 1.32.3-1 [installed: 1

Re: [arch-general] Secure Boot Support

2012-12-10 Thread kristof
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:26:58 -0800, kristof wrote: Oh, and some UEFI implementations don't actually allow users to add keys to the database; only remove them. The workaround to this is to delete all keys in the database, which would cause the computer to boot into "setup-mode", where a use

Re: [arch-general] Secure Boot Support

2012-12-10 Thread kristof
Oh, and some UEFI implementations don't actually allow users to add keys to the database; only remove them. The workaround to this is to delete all keys in the database, which would cause the computer to boot into "setup-mode", where a user could manually start repopulating the key database

Re: [arch-general] Secure Boot Support

2012-12-10 Thread kristof
First, I'd like to apologize for sending a very lengthy reply that wasn't attached to this thread. I didn't realize that just because a thread's five days old doesn't mean you can't reply to it. On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 01:28:23 -0800, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 10.12.2012 06:54, schrieb krist

Re: [arch-general] NFS close-to-open

2012-12-10 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
On Monday 10 Dec 2012 09:26:51 Bryan Schumaker wrote: > On 12/10/2012 08:11 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > > Does anyone have any idea why "nocto" doesn't have the effect I was hoping > > it would? The "async" option works as expected, but it's more important > > to me that the client cache is corr

[arch-general] python+pango

2012-12-10 Thread Fons Adriaensen
Hello all, Is there a python3 module for pango (as there is one for cairo) ? pacman -Ss pango gives me: extra/libtiger 0.3.4-3 A rendering library for Kate streams using Pango and Cairo extra/pango 1.32.3-1 [installed: 1.30.1-1] A library for layout and rendering of text extra/pango-per

Re: [arch-general] Concerning Secure Boot Support

2012-12-10 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 10.12.2012 06:54, schrieb kristof: > > As it stands, Gummiboot doesn't support calling back to Matthew > > Garrett's shim and until this happens it won't work in secure boot mode. > > Could you refer to any documentation about this? Why

Re: [arch-general] NFS close-to-open

2012-12-10 Thread Bryan Schumaker
On 12/10/2012 08:11 AM, Paul Gideon Dann wrote: > I've been learning about the close-to-open policy of NFS, which causes each > file to be flushed to the server as it's closed, to ensure consistency across > clients. This is a big performance hit when trying to upgrade the system, > because of

[arch-general] NFS close-to-open

2012-12-10 Thread Paul Gideon Dann
I've been learning about the close-to-open policy of NFS, which causes each file to be flushed to the server as it's closed, to ensure consistency across clients. This is a big performance hit when trying to upgrade the system, because of the numerous writes to small files. I know about the "a

Re: [arch-general] Concerning Secure Boot Support

2012-12-10 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 10.12.2012 06:54, schrieb kristof: > As it stands, Gummiboot doesn't support calling back to Matthew > Garrett's shim and until this happens it won't work in secure boot mode. Could you refer to any documentation about this? Why would the boot loader need to call back into shim? > Lastly, the

Re: [arch-general] On /etc/conf.d deprecation

2012-12-10 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2012-12-10 09:14:49 +0100] "Jérôme M. Berger": > Tom Gundersen wrote: > > However, options that are unrelated to the init-system should not be > > specified in ExecStart=, but should be configured in the applications > > own configuration file. It has nothing to do with systemd, so for > > systemd

Re: [arch-general] On /etc/conf.d deprecation

2012-12-10 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
Daniel Micay wrote: > The issue with /etc/conf.d is that it's Arch-specific. There are still > a lot of cases where the packages themselves still provide the units, > but there is a push to get them upstream whenever possible to remove a > lot of burden from the packagers, and share more work betwe

Re: [arch-general] On /etc/conf.d deprecation

2012-12-10 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
Tom Gundersen wrote: > Options related to the init-system, such as where the lock-file is > located should be indicated as an option in ExecStart. The reason this > makes sense is that it must match what is specifid in PIDFile=. The > same goes for any other option that systemd requires to be a cer