I've been having troubles mounting an external USB HDD to two of the three
USB ports on my laptop. dmesg reports a timeout connecting to the device;
plugging in other devices to the same ports works fine with no errors. I've
attached the log here[1].
The drive in question is a Seagate 1.5 TB Expan
> Thanks for the pointers; something for another evening
This bug has attached sysemd service files for leafnode.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24530
Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 08:21 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>> [2012-10-16 10:41:09 -0500] Leonid Isaev:
>>> I fully support having netcfg in base (and as a default
network backend
>>> in arch) because it is far better than the alternatives :)
I don't think
>>> that wpa_supplicant/crda be
[2012-10-18 15:15:02 -0400] Leonid Isaev:
> On 10/16/2012 08:21 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> >
> >Since routers do not need netcfg any more than they do wpa_supplicant,
> >with your reasoning, it should not be in base either...
> >
>
> YMMV apparently, but in my experience a router needs:
> (1) Some
I am trying to figure the best way to do LDAP authentication (using a
customized version of nss-pam-ldapd from AUR) on my laboratory, but I am
having some problems. Since Arch now have a pambase package that should be
imported on every pam configuration files (instead to relly on using old
*.so for
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:55:30 -0400 Dave Reisner wrote:
[...]
>Use inetd-style activation via systemd. See sshd@.service and
>sshd.socket as an example. xinetd is redundant.
Thanks for the pointers; something for another evening!
--
-- ^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~
hi list,
i played around with neo2, an alternative kbd layout optimized for
german. in my kde environment.
the main concept of neo is using meta keys to shift between layers.
for me, the meta4 key is not working on either side. i found some
suggestions to solve this problem, but nothing worked
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:26:16PM +0100, Whiskers wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:03:57 +0200 Thomas Bächler
> wrote:
>
> >Am 17.10.2012 21:29, schrieb Whiskers:
> >> Rather than install tcp-wrappers on my Arch system, I'd like to use
> >> whatever the proper "server" is nowadays instead of /usr
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:03:57 +0200 Thomas Bächler
wrote:
>Am 17.10.2012 21:29, schrieb Whiskers:
>> Rather than install tcp-wrappers on my Arch system, I'd like to use
>> whatever the proper "server" is nowadays instead of /usr/sbin/tcpd - but
>> what is it?
>
>Why would you replace tcpd with any
On 10/16/2012 08:21 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2012-10-16 10:41:09 -0500] Leonid Isaev:
I fully support having netcfg in base (and as a default network backend in
arch) because it is far better than the alternatives :) I don't think that
wpa_supplicant/crda belongs in base (for instance routers d
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Thanos Zygouris
wrote:
> Hi,
> If i run 'pacman -Qdt' (search for not needed installed packages) i got:
> dri2proto 2.8-1
> glproto 1.4.16-1
> mesa 9.0-1
>
> If i remember right, these were intalled by xf86-video-intel, or
> intel-dri in the past.
> So, my question
Hi,
If i run 'pacman -Qdt' (search for not needed installed packages) i got:
dri2proto 2.8-1
glproto 1.4.16-1
mesa 9.0-1
If i remember right, these were intalled by xf86-video-intel, or
intel-dri in the past.
So, my question is: can i remove these packages safely?
My video card is:
'Intel Corpora
Thank you very much!
I will be informing some friends who asked the same to me :)
Am 17.10.2012 20:42, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
> Hi!
> I got this:
>
> ( 7/11) upgrading
> nfs-utils
> [--] 100%
> warning: directory permissions differ on
> var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs/
> filesystem: 555 package: 755
>
> It's safe to just chmod the /var/li
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:46:36PM +1100, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2012-10-17 15:42:56 -0300] Martín Cigorraga:
> > warning: directory permissions differ on var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs/
> > filesystem: 555 package: 755
>
> The difference between 555 and 755 is write permission for the owner...
> So it
15 matches
Mail list logo
