On Wednesday 17 of October 2012 01:12:28 you wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 of October 2012 10:33:53 Sébastien Leblanc wrote:
> > On 16 October 2012 01:42, gt wrote:
> > > Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
> > > through mutt, so i don't need this.
> >
> > Pam is takin
On Tuesday 16 of October 2012 10:33:53 Sébastien Leblanc wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 01:42, gt wrote:
> > Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
> > through mutt, so i don't need this.
>
> Pam is taking care of showing whether you have mail or not. In
> /etc/pam.d/
[2012-10-16 10:41:09 -0500] Leonid Isaev:
> I fully support having netcfg in base (and as a default network backend in
> arch) because it is far better than the alternatives :) I don't think that
> wpa_supplicant/crda belongs in base (for instance routers don't need
> wpa_supplicant but may require
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:58 PM, jambov wrote:
> I found some kind of ugly workaround, by putting
> setfont Cyr_a8x16 -m cp1251
> in ~/.bashrc ; however the question why systemd-vconsole-setup does not
> affect the rest of the ttys at startup still remains...
Probably what happens is that systemd
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 23:08:33 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 16.10.2012 20:15, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
> > Interesting, but I don't know. This may be a polkit setting. If you find
> > out, I'd be interested.
> >
> > I was sugested in the #systemd channel that this may be associated with
> > d
On 10/16/2012 05:28 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 16.10.2012 17:40, schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
[2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent "systemd is now the default on
new installations" annou
Am 16.10.2012 17:40, schrieb Gaetan Bisson:
> [2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
>> I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
>> missed this. But given the recent "systemd is now the default on
>> new installations" announcement, I'm wondering: what's the rea
Am 16.10.2012 20:15, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
> Interesting, but I don't know. This may be a polkit setting. If you find
> out, I'd be interested.
>
> I was sugested in the #systemd channel that this may be associated with
> dbus:
> 06:31:17 Mithrandir | sounds like the dbus config isn't restrict
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Joshua Collins wrote:
> On 10/16/12, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
> > 4. Is there any place for e4rat(lite)?
> > Since I activated systemd's built-in ureadahead feature, will e4rat still
> > add any improve-
> > ment? What do you say?
>
> I would suggest that you benc
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Sébastien Leblanc
wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 01:42, gt wrote:
>> Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
>> through mutt, so i don't need this.
>
> Pam is taking care of showing whether you have mail or not. In
> /etc/pam.d/system-l
On 10/16/2012 10:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
...
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/32014
Attachments worked this time ... sorry for noise on that.
gene/
On 10/16/2012 11:40 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent "systemd is now the default on
new installations" announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons
fo
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 04:24:37PM +0200, Krzysztof Warzecha wrote:
> 2012/10/16 gt :
> > Any idea what's causing it to show up?
>
> Well, you could always try brute force method. Login and run this as root:
>
> strace -vft -p $TARGET_GETTY_PID -o /tmp/strace-getty
>
> Now login in straced termi
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:33:53AM -0400, Sébastien Leblanc wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 01:42, gt wrote:
> > Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
> > through mutt, so i don't need this.
>
> Pam is taking care of showing whether you have mail or not. In
> /etc/pam
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:22:05 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 16.10.2012 14:05, schrieb Joakim Hernberg:
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:51:34 +0200
> > Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >
> >> I am fine with add wpa_supplicant, iw and crda to base if we really
> >> want wireless support installed by default.
[2012-10-16 11:16:04 -0400] David Rosenstrauch:
> I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
> missed this. But given the recent "systemd is now the default on
> new installations" announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons
> for Arch making systemd the default going
I haven't been diligently following the mailing list, so perhaps I
missed this. But given the recent "systemd is now the default on new
installations" announcement, I'm wondering: what's the reasons for Arch
making systemd the default going forward? The systemd wiki page gives a
lot of techn
I have started getting kernel oops yesterday. This started after
fully updated testing repo and switch to systemd over last weekend. I'm
running kde.
Bug is filed as shown below with screenshot which I managed to
capture of the OOPS from today's crash.
Laptop is sandy bridge i7 (leno
On 16 October 2012 01:42, gt wrote:
> Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
> through mutt, so i don't need this.
Pam is taking care of showing whether you have mail or not. In
/etc/pam.d/system-login, comment this line:
sessionoptional pam_mail.so
2012/10/16 gt :
> Any idea what's causing it to show up?
Well, you could always try brute force method. Login and run this as root:
strace -vft -p $TARGET_GETTY_PID -o /tmp/strace-getty
Now login in straced terminal, logout and grep for "New mail" in
/tmp/strace-getty. You will get (among other
Am 16.10.2012 14:05, schrieb Joakim Hernberg:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:51:34 +0200
> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
>> I am fine with add wpa_supplicant, iw and crda to base if we really
>> want wireless support installed by default.
>
> Not that I install many systems, once installed... But I for one
I found some kind of ugly workaround, by putting
setfont Cyr_a8x16 -m cp1251
in ~/.bashrc ; however the question why systemd-vconsole-setup does not
affect the rest of the ttys at startup still remains...
--
View this message in context:
http://archlinux.2023198.n4.nabble.com/system-locale-mes
Here is what I uncommented in /etc/locale.gen:
bg_BG CP1251
/etc/vconsole.conf:
KEYMAP=bg-cp1251
FONT=Cyr_a8x16
FONT_MAP=cp1251
/etc/locale.conf:
LANG="bg_BG.CP1251"
LC_COLLATE="C"
LC_TIME="bg_BG.CP1251"
I ran locale-gen and locale -a as root. And after these steps I have
readable cyrillic cha
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:51:34 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> I am fine with add wpa_supplicant, iw and crda to base if we really
> want wireless support installed by default.
Not that I install many systems, once installed... But I for one would
appreciate having wireless support on the install m
Whenever I log in to a TTY, I get this message. I read my system mails
through mutt, so i don't need this.
I have unset MAILCHECK in .bashrc, but no effect.
I set MAIL_CHECK_ENAB to no in login.defs, but still no effect.
Lastly i tried creating a .hushlogin file in the user's home, but even
that
On 10/16/12, Martín Cigorraga wrote:
> 4. Is there any place for e4rat(lite)?
> Since I activated systemd's built-in ureadahead feature, will e4rat still
> add any improve-
> ment? What do you say?
I would suggest that you benchmark this for yourself. I found pretty
good results using e4rat alon
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:10:21AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 16.10.2012 03:56, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> >
> >> [2012-10-15 22:25:58 -0300] Martín Cigorraga:
> >>> Basically I need to know how to handle these daemons:
> >>> hwclo
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 16.10.2012 03:56, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Gaetan Bisson >wrote:
> >
> >> [2012-10-15 22:25:58 -0300] Martín Cigorraga:
> >>> Basically I need to know how to handle these daemons:
> >>> hwclock
> >>
Am 16.10.2012 03:56, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>
>> [2012-10-15 22:25:58 -0300] Martín Cigorraga:
>>> Basically I need to know how to handle these daemons:
>>> hwclock
>>
>> Ditch it. Use NTP instead:
I think systemd does hwclock handling i
Am 16.10.2012 09:25, schrieb Martín Cigorraga:
> 1. Units with errors shown in systemctl --all:
> arch-modules-load.serviceerror inactive
> dead arch-modules
> auditd.service error inactive
> dead auditd.se
Hi all,
I've been playing with systemd for a few hours now and I must say I'm
impressed,
it's a very powerful tool. I want to thanks the devs for making the
transition to it
really smooth :)
Now, as I'm still learning my way through it -that means I'm reading a
lot!- I find that
there are in my sy
31 matches
Mail list logo