On 03/10/12, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
| Hi guys,
| please signoff 3.5.5 series for both arches.
| package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
| http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/
|
| This will move to [core] directly, because 3.6.0 is in [testing].
Working fine on 2 x x86_64 VPS box
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.5.5 series for both arches.
package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/
This will move to [core] directly, because 3.6.0 is in [testing].
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa
People just do not learn...
All post to the mailing list are now moderated. As this takes time away
from us actually maintaining the distribution, this will only occur
intermittently.
Allan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 02.10.2012 13:36, schrieb Heiko Baums:
> And btw. ...
>
> So much about the very effective banning. Yes, I was indeed banned,
> and like Allan told me, he wanted to ban me forever, because I sent
> him a few comments on his banning. *rofl*
>
> Tha
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:14 AM, nailz wrote:
> I too am fed up with all the dross and i only been here a few weeks, i
> mean nobody is forcing anyone to use arch, if people dont agree with the
> way its heading either jump ship to another distro , or god forbid maybe
> even add something constr
On Oct 2, 2012 7:15 PM, "nailz" wrote:
>
> On 3 October 2012 00:18, Your Real Name wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:29:38PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> > > On 01/10/12 20:23, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 AM, gt wrote:
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:49:05AM
On 3 October 2012 00:18, Your Real Name wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:29:38PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> > On 01/10/12 20:23, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 AM, gt wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:49:05AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> > >>> On 01/10/12 11:21,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:29:38PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 01/10/12 20:23, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 AM, gt wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:49:05AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >>> On 01/10/12 11:21, Armando M. Baratti wrote:
> Authoritarian and despoti
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Ike Devolder wrote:
> well then for the people where networkmanager is not so nice to:
> the following is an actual example and consistent over all my machines
> with dhclient (4 desktops having the exact same output)
>
> --- /var/run/nm-dhclient-eth0.conf --- (with
> -Mensaje original-
> De: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] En nombre de
Ike
> Devolder
> Enviado el: lunes, 01 de octubre de 2012 20:18
> Para: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Asunto: Re: [arch-general] NetworkManager, DHCP and DNS
>
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Heiko Baums
> wrote:
> >> The way I read it is that the sort of problems you would typically
> >> workaround with suspend hooks are best solved somewhere else, probably
> >> in the kernel driver.
>
> [...]
>
>
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> The way I read it is that the sort of problems you would typically
>> workaround with suspend hooks are best solved somewhere else, probably
>> in the kernel driver.
[...]
> Now the Linux kernel is blamed for the systemd insufficiencies and
>
On Tuesday 02 Oct 2012 13:15:21 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 02.10.2012 12:00, schrieb Paul Gideon Dann:
> > Thanks. I'm not sure what sysupgrade you're referring to? Sysupgrade
> > seems to be a BSD thing. It seems like this stuff needs to happen in the
> > initrd, but I'm a little confused that
Am 02.10.2012 13:28, schrieb Heiko Baums:
> Am Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:12:24 +0200
> schrieb Tom Gundersen :
>
>> The way I read it is that the sort of problems you would typically
>> workaround with suspend hooks are best solved somewhere else, probably
>> in the kernel driver.
>
> That's so typical
Am Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:28:40 +0200
schrieb Heiko Baums :
> That's so typical for those Poetterix fanboys and developers.
>
> Firstly ALSA was blamed for the PulseAudio insufficiencies and bugs.
> ALSA was blamed for PulseAudio not working with a lot of professional
> audio and sound cards even if
Am Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:12:24 +0200
schrieb Tom Gundersen :
> The way I read it is that the sort of problems you would typically
> workaround with suspend hooks are best solved somewhere else, probably
> in the kernel driver.
That's so typical for those Poetterix fanboys and developers.
Firstly AL
Am 02.10.2012 12:00, schrieb Paul Gideon Dann:
> Thanks. I'm not sure what sysupgrade you're referring to? Sysupgrade seems
> to be a BSD thing. It seems like this stuff needs to happen in the initrd,
> but I'm a little confused that you haven't mentioned it. What is it that
> runs
> these
On 02-10-2012 11:12, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Mauro Santos
> wrote:
>> This seems to imply that a service file should be used, what I can't
>> figure out from the documentation or google searches is how to implement
>> the functionality I want with a .service file, o
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Mauro Santos
wrote:
> This seems to imply that a service file should be used, what I can't
> figure out from the documentation or google searches is how to implement
> the functionality I want with a .service file, or if a service file is
> actually needed/recommen
I have made the jump to systemd and I have been ironing a few things
here and there, one of them is setting the HD advanced power management
to a sane level to avoid excessive wear due to constant head parking.
I've been able to achieve this by placing my script in
/usr/lib/systemd/system-sleep, h
On Monday 01 Oct 2012 17:19:40 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 01.10.2012 15:50, schrieb Paul Gideon Dann:
> > Makes sense. I would certainly think twice for something as complex as a
> > full interactive desktop setup. I hold by NFS for this cluster, though.
> If you don't run a desktop, then you may
21 matches
Mail list logo
