On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:49 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 01:30 AM, Erik Johnson wrote:
>
>> After several months of not updating my home server, I decided to run
>> updates tonight. I still hadn't done the /usr/lib symlink move, so I
>> followed the guide on the wiki like I did f
On 10/02/2012 01:30 AM, Erik Johnson wrote:
After several months of not updating my home server, I decided to run
updates tonight. I still hadn't done the /usr/lib symlink move, so I
followed the guide on the wiki like I did for my other boxes and still
ended up borking my system. Think this is b
After several months of not updating my home server, I decided to run
updates tonight. I still hadn't done the /usr/lib symlink move, so I
followed the guide on the wiki like I did for my other boxes and still
ended up borking my system. Think this is because I accidentally said "yes"
to upgrading
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:54:24AM +0200, Jan Steffens wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Ike Devolder wrote:
> > Are you using NetworkManager with dhclient ?
> > NetworkManager with dhcpcd should give you no issues since dhcpcd sends
> > the hostname along with the dhcp request.
> >
> > dhc
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Ike Devolder wrote:
> Are you using NetworkManager with dhclient ?
> NetworkManager with dhcpcd should give you no issues since dhcpcd sends
> the hostname along with the dhcp request.
>
> dhclient does not with the defaults given by NetworkManager.
Actually, it do
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 07:03:50PM +0200, Guillermo Leira wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have been using wicd for a long time. I have installed and enabled
> NetworkManager service (with systemd). It seems to work, but I have found
> that when asking for a DHCP address, it does not register the conexion in
Hello!
I have been using wicd for a long time. I have installed and enabled
NetworkManager service (with systemd). It seems to work, but I have found
that when asking for a DHCP address, it does not register the conexion in
the DNS server (as wicd does). I can't find anything about this issue...
Am 01.10.2012 15:50, schrieb Paul Gideon Dann:
> Makes sense. I would certainly think twice for something as complex as a
> full
> interactive desktop setup. I hold by NFS for this cluster, though.
If you don't run a desktop, then you may be fine.
> I really like your sync-on-boot solution.
On Monday 01 Oct 2012 15:34:41 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> We have a 100MBit/s network, which may or may not be the bottleneck
> Loading a modern desktop environment like KDE over NFS just takes too
> long. A user needs to wait up to 5 minutes after login, starting
> applications isn't instant, everyth
Am 01.10.2012 15:21, schrieb Paul Gideon Dann:
> On Monday 01 Oct 2012 14:22:41 Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> IMO, root file systems on NFS are a failure by design anyway - I worked
>> in such a scenario for years and it is a bad bad bad idea. While we
>> should fix easy problems such as this one, we sh
On Monday 01 Oct 2012 14:22:41 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> IMO, root file systems on NFS are a failure by design anyway - I worked
> in such a scenario for years and it is a bad bad bad idea. While we
> should fix easy problems such as this one, we should not spend too much
> time on making this work.
On 1 Oct 2012 13:49, "Tom Gundersen" wrote:
>
> Hi Leonidas,
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
> wrote:
> > l'm trying to send a patch over to arch-projects mailing list and it's
> > rejected from filters.
> > I added to subject the [archweb] as instructed from irc channel.
Am 01.10.2012 14:42, schrieb Leonidas Spyropoulos:
> Hey all,
> l'm trying to send a patch over to arch-projects mailing list and it's
> rejected from filters.
> I added to subject the [archweb] as instructed from irc channel.
>
> This is my full subject: [archweb] [PATCH] Update Readme with Troub
Hi Leonidas,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
wrote:
> l'm trying to send a patch over to arch-projects mailing list and it's
> rejected from filters.
> I added to subject the [archweb] as instructed from irc channel.
>
> This is my full subject: [archweb] [PATCH] Update Readm
Hey all,
l'm trying to send a patch over to arch-projects mailing list and it's
rejected from filters.
I added to subject the [archweb] as instructed from irc channel.
This is my full subject: [archweb] [PATCH] Update Readme with Troubleshoot
guide for SQLITE and POSTGRES
Any idea why?
Leonidas
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 01/10/12 20:23, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>>
>> ("The life of Brian", anyone? The lapidation sketch? Oops again: I hope
>>
>
> Lapidation fails when I can just punish everyone... I am more than
> happy to just close the list again.
>
In the lap
On 01/10/12 20:23, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 AM, gt wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:49:05AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> On 01/10/12 11:21, Armando M. Baratti wrote:
Authoritarian and despotic.
My ban, please.
>>>
>>> Done... and for two weeks be
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 AM, gt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:49:05AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 01/10/12 11:21, Armando M. Baratti wrote:
>> > Authoritarian and despotic.
>> >
>> > My ban, please.
>> >
>>
>> Done... and for two weeks because I had to look up what despotic meant.
>
On Monday 01 Oct 2012 11:09:05 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> The lack of capability support on NFS is a shame. In general, we should
> probably fall back to setuid-root whenever setcap fails and silence this
> error message.
>
> In my opinion, capabilities should be used much more widely and replace
> s
Am 01.10.2012 11:05, schrieb Paul Gideon Dann:
> On Friday 28 Sep 2012 16:32:09 Bryan Schumaker wrote:
>>> I suspect this is something to do with NFS not supporting the capabilities
>>> that setcap is trying to use, but I admit I haven't encountered
>>> capabilities before I ran into this issue, so
On Friday 28 Sep 2012 16:32:09 Bryan Schumaker wrote:
> > I suspect this is something to do with NFS not supporting the capabilities
> > that setcap is trying to use, but I admit I haven't encountered
> > capabilities before I ran into this issue, so it's just a guess.
> >
> > Has anyone else seen
21 matches
Mail list logo
