On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:09:59PM -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just had a minor hiccup, because one of the packages updated in my
> pacman -Syu this morning substituted a version I had tweaked the ABS
> way.
>
> Nothing serious, as I say, and wholly my fault, but yet I was
>
On 25/09/12, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
| If a "troll" would write something stupid about any other software, from
| any other coder, this never ever would cause such a useless and long
| thread. It needs "fans" to continue nothing.
It takes two to tango. Perhaps you need a reminder of the fair and
bala
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:34:37PM -0400, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> On 09/25/12 at 08:16pm, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez
> > wrote:
> > > Would it be possible/make sense to have pacman inform us whenever it is
> > > going to
> > > substitute a package
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Manolo Martínez
wrote:
> On 09/25/12 at 08:16pm, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez
>> wrote:
>> > Would it be possible/make sense to have pacman inform us whenever it is
>> > going to
>> > substitute a package that has bee
> Many times these tweaks are temporary and, indeed, newer versions make
> them unnecessary. It can definitely be done as you suggest, but I think
> it'd be in the spirit of the help provided by, e.g., .pacsave and .pacnew
> files, to have pacman issue a warning.
> --
Pacman doesn't really have a
Ohh, I missed that. Sorry for the noise.
Am 25.09.2012 20:01 schrieb "Karol Blazewicz" :
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Christopher Reimer
> wrote:
> > I've already written this to the bugtracker. There I was told to post it
> here:
> >
> > seamonkey is flagged out of date for about 4 weeks
On 09/25/12 at 08:16pm, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez
> wrote:
> > Would it be possible/make sense to have pacman inform us whenever it is
> > going to
> > substitute a package that has been ABS'd?
>
> Why not put your tweaked packages in 'IgnorePkg' i
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Manolo Martínez
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just had a minor hiccup, because one of the packages updated in my
> pacman -Syu this morning substituted a version I had tweaked the ABS
> way.
>
> Nothing serious, as I say, and wholly my fault, but yet I was
> wondering:
Hello,
I've just had a minor hiccup, because one of the packages updated in my
pacman -Syu this morning substituted a version I had tweaked the ABS
way.
Nothing serious, as I say, and wholly my fault, but yet I was
wondering: Would it be possible/make sense to have pacman inform us whenever it
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Christopher Reimer
wrote:
> I've already written this to the bugtracker. There I was told to post it here:
>
> seamonkey is flagged out of date for about 4 weeks now.
>
> There are several security vulnerabilites in 2.11 -->
> http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:35:50 +0200
Christopher Reimer wrote:
> I've already written this to the bugtracker. There I was told to post
> it here:
>
> seamonkey is flagged out of date for about 4 weeks now.
>
> There are several security vulnerabilites in 2.11 -->
> http://www.mozilla.org/security
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> This might be helpful
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=arch+wiki+email+filter
I'm really tired of this nonsense, so I'll unsubscribe. No need to
answer me, because I'll not see it. Not that it will be any loss for
Arch per se, but I really think that t
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 17:26 +0200, G. Schlisio wrote:
> please stop it altogether. this leads nowhere.
Heiko, 13 mails, including the replies to the mails of the others.
Others, 46 mails.
Don't blame a single person.
Useful input regarding to the subject, perhaps around 2 mails?
If a "troll" woul
Am 25.09.2012 16:59, schrieb Simon Perry:
On 25/09/12, Felipe Contreras wrote:
| There's a difference between using a strong tone, and being a troll.
|
| Using that definition, Linus Torvalds is a troll on the LKML. I disagree.
The Linux kernel has never had a bug that has resulted in an
un-bo
On 25/09/12, Felipe Contreras wrote:
| There's a difference between using a strong tone, and being a troll.
|
| Using that definition, Linus Torvalds is a troll on the LKML. I disagree.
The Linux kernel has never had a bug that has resulted in an
un-bootable system. So as Heiko says, that is why
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:28:40 -0300
> schrieb Denis A. Altoé Falqueto :
>
>> How long will we have to endure such nonsense? Heiko, you hijacked a
>> thread just to tell your opinion, which everyone already know from
>> your previous posts. And,
Heiko Baums baums-on-web.de> writes:
> "Hey, I don't like him and his opinion. So admins, ban him." Is it
> this what you want to say?
Using sarcasm like you did in your first message of this thread, and using words
like "Poetterix" and "fanboys" is not stating an option. It's trolling. Also,
hi
Am Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:28:40 -0300
schrieb Denis A. Altoé Falqueto :
> How long will we have to endure such nonsense? Heiko, you hijacked a
> thread just to tell your opinion, which everyone already know from
> your previous posts. And, please, don't reply to me. I don't care.
>
> Thomas, wasn't
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:35:47 +0200
> schrieb Øyvind Heggstad :
>
>> Don't worry, you are not at fault in any way here, the systemd
>> hateboy(z)/fudspreader(s) are.
>
> Wrong. The systemd fanboys who want to force this crap on everybody
> else
Am Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:35:47 +0200
schrieb Øyvind Heggstad :
> Don't worry, you are not at fault in any way here, the systemd
> hateboy(z)/fudspreader(s) are.
Wrong. The systemd fanboys who want to force this crap on everybody
else are. The "fudspreaders", as you call them, have already made thei
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:52:54 +0900
Zhengyu Xu wrote:
> Hi Allan,
>
> Thank you very much for the link as well as the removal of systemd
> i686 from testing repo. Sorry for generating some unnecessary noise
> in this list.
>
> Best regards,
> Z.
>
Don't worry, you are not at fault in any way h
>Personally if you have a large enough separate drive and enough
>patience. I would do a bit level copy which if successful is guaranteed
>to put the disk back exactly.
>
>#/bin/dd bs=32k if=/dev/sd? | /usr/bin/gzip > /media/usb0/hpBACKUP.dd.gz
>
>Restore with
>
>#/bin/cat /media/usb0/hpBACKUP.dd.g
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
>> -Mensaje original-
>> De: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] En nombre de
>> Guillermo Leira
>> Enviado el: martes, 25 de septiembre de 2012 8:49
>> Para: 'General Discussion about Arch Linux'
>> Asunto: [arch
> -Mensaje original-
> De: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] En nombre de
> Guillermo Leira
> Enviado el: martes, 25 de septiembre de 2012 8:49
> Para: 'General Discussion about Arch Linux'
> Asunto: [arch-general] MS-Exchange email
>
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:0
24 matches
Mail list logo
