> -Mensaje original-
> De: arch-general [mailto:arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org] En nombre de Ralf
> Mardorf
> Enviado el: lunes, 24 de septiembre de 2012 7:49
> Para: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Asunto: Re: [arch-general] Upgrading an old system
>
> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 02:4
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 02:45 -0300, Victor Silva wrote:
> Afaik he never specified the system was an arch system :p
:D
2012/9/24 Ralf Mardorf
> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 10:28 +0530, gt wrote:
> > " Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0"
>
> Perhaps this is an evidence for VBox running on the upgraded Arch.
>
> Afaik he never specified the system was an arch system :p
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 10:28 +0530, gt wrote:
> " Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0"
Perhaps this is an evidence for VBox running on the upgraded Arch.
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 01:48 -0300, Victor Silva wrote:
> I could just go yes but pacman suggests me to answer no.
I guess it's a protection, to avoid switching by accident and not a
suggestion. My answer was "y".
Regards,
Ralf
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 18:00 +0200, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> One thing did catch my attention though. you have your rme audio card
> in a slot that shares irq with the nvidia and with several usb
> devices. Imo that is really asking for trouble and you need to at the
> very least get your soundcar
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:21:04PM +0200, Guillermo Leira wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have just finished upgrading a system that was powered off (broken
> battery) since February 2011. Just for the fun of doing so.
>
> I couldn't help saying it... I'm quite proud of this achievement. ;-)
Pics or it didn'
On 9/24/2012 12:48 AM, Victor Silva wrote:
Folks after trying to update today I got the following error:
util-linux and eject are in conflict
According to this:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-July/023320.html
I could just go yes but pacman suggests me to answer no. I
Folks after trying to update today I got the following error:
util-linux and eject are in conflict
According to this:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-July/023320.html
I could just go yes but pacman suggests me to answer no. I've found nothing
on the boards nor webpage.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Tino Reichardt wrote:
> * Heiko Baums wrote:
>> Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:15:16 +0200
>> schrieb fredbezies :
>>
>> > Don't you read the *important* word : testing ! Are you blind ?
>>
>> I read that. And what goes into [testing]? Yes! Bingo! Software version
>> whic
* Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:15:16 +0200
> schrieb fredbezies :
>
> > Don't you read the *important* word : testing ! Are you blind ?
>
> I read that. And what goes into [testing]? Yes! Bingo! Software version
> which are released by upstream as *stable*. So yes, upstream was
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:21:04PM +0200, Guillermo Leira wrote:
> I couldn't help saying it... I'm quite proud of this achievement. ;-)
It is fun, you've done well.
- --
John Hutchison
Programmieren und
Informatik-Abteilung
Feiern Sie 20 Jahre Linux
Hi!
I have just finished upgrading a system that was powered off (broken
battery) since February 2011. Just for the fun of doing so.
I couldn't help saying it... I'm quite proud of this achievement. ;-)
Guillermo Leira
On 23-09-2012 19:38, Arno Gaboury wrote:
> I went straight to systemd, and nothing exploded on my face! Do not be
> scared, far from being so complex at it seems to.
I wasn't expecting anything to explode, it's just my policy to do things
in small incremental steps and use test subjects first if p
On 23/09/12||18:50, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 23-09-2012 18:38, Arno Gaboury wrote:
> > On 23/09/12||18:16, Mauro Santos wrote:
> >> So far I am only testing how systemd behaves in my system and what
> >> changes I need to do before I permanently make the switch.
> >>
> >> So far the first problem,
On 23-09-2012 18:38, Arno Gaboury wrote:
> On 23/09/12||18:16, Mauro Santos wrote:
>> So far I am only testing how systemd behaves in my system and what
>> changes I need to do before I permanently make the switch.
>>
>> So far the first problem, which doesn't seem to be covered in the wiki,
>> for
On 23/09/12||18:16, Mauro Santos wrote:
> So far I am only testing how systemd behaves in my system and what
> changes I need to do before I permanently make the switch.
>
> So far the first problem, which doesn't seem to be covered in the wiki,
> forum or google searches, is that if I switch to a
So far I am only testing how systemd behaves in my system and what
changes I need to do before I permanently make the switch.
So far the first problem, which doesn't seem to be covered in the wiki,
forum or google searches, is that if I switch to a tty after starting X
I get just a blank screen. I
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> Why am I not surprised?
>
> Why should you be? I'm not. I don't think anyone finds it surprising
> that software has bugs, or that actively developed software has the
> occ
Hi,
Occasionally (while using google chrome) my X server crashes completely
and takes me back to the tty login. Examining the journal entries reveals
the following highlighted in red:
Sep 23 17:03:33 myarchbox kernel: [drm] nouveau :00:05.0: fail
ttm_validate
Sep 23 17:03:34 myarchbox kerne
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 02:21:28PM +0530, gt wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:19:42AM +0200, Tom Rand wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:18:52AM +0200, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > > Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 11:11:12 +0200
> > > schrieb fredbezies :
> > >
> > > > I was fed up by the crap of the origina
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:19:42AM +0200, Tom Rand wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:18:52AM +0200, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 11:11:12 +0200
> > schrieb fredbezies :
> >
> > > I was fed up by the crap of the original poster. So I said what need
> > > to be written, even if it wa
Hi Heiko,
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Why am I not surprised?
Why should you be? I'm not. I don't think anyone finds it surprising
that software has bugs, or that actively developed software has the
occasional regression. It will happen from time to time, even with
syst
>
>
> way to go with kicking up a freeking troll fest!
>
>
>
LOL!
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:18:52AM +0200, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 11:11:12 +0200
> schrieb fredbezies :
>
> > I was fed up by the crap of the original poster. So I said what need
> > to be written, even if it was a little hard.
> >
> > I will remove myself from this list, because
25 matches
Mail list logo
