On 13 August 2012 21:36, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 21:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Some chips work better at e.g. 96KHz, it doesn't depend to the KHz,
> simply to the chip.
>
I always thought that these high sampling frequencies are used to
avoid aliasing without need for a
On 13 August 2012 06:29, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
Nevermind, solved after reinstalling full MySQL stack.
--
-msx
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 06:07 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
>
>
> This may be resolved upstream[1]:
>
> gene
>
> === From lkml ==
> I'm re-releasing the iproute2 tools for 3.5.0 kernel.
>
> There were a couple of bugs (one seri
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 21:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 20:33 +0200, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> > I doubt those use 16 bits input. Even low-end hi-fi digital
> > recorders support 24 bits, which gives -72dB for the noise and
> > starts indeed to be acceptable. But most end-u
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 20:33 +0200, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> I doubt those use 16 bits input. Even low-end hi-fi digital
> recorders support 24 bits, which gives -72dB for the noise and
> starts indeed to be acceptable. But most end-user will simply set
> their system to "CD quality" (or leave it
On 08/06/2012 06:07 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
This may be resolved upstream[1]:
gene
=== From lkml ==
I'm re-releasing the iproute2 tools for 3.5.0 kernel.
There were a couple of bugs (one serious) in the 3.5.0 version.
...
Mike Frysinger (1):
Fix regression
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:33:41PM +0200, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > 16 bit means that there are 2^16 possible values for a sample. So the
> > signal is quantised to the nearest level. Except in some special cases,
> > the error (a rounding error) is random and appears
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 19:53 +0200, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> Two points:
>
> - You don't readjust the master continuously, but you don't
> add/remove sources on the fly either. You adjust the master in the
> beginning when you setup your system, but the reason you can do that
> is becaus
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> 16 bit means that there are 2^16 possible values for a sample. So the
> signal is quantised to the nearest level. Except in some special cases,
> the error (a rounding error) is random and appears as noise. For a
> 16-bit card, that noise will have a level that is 98 dB low
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Jayesh Badwaik
wrote:
> Another flame may start here, but I would like to present the following
> as a pure news, no opinions[1].
You're free to post this, but don't for one second pretend that it is
anything, but flame bait.
=-Jameson
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 19:38 +0200, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
>> Actually, that's one point where PA is right (even though it's
>> wrong on a lot of other points): doing it like (2) avoids amplifying
>> the quantification noise if the sound card applies the master gain
>>
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 16:35 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:08:04PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > For professional usage cables usually have to be self-made. Btw. I once
> > asked if Neutrik plastic cable relief does crumble all over the world
> > after a while at LA
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 23:49 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
>>> Otherwise, we usually make our own cables.
>>
>> Private I sometimes buy ready to use cables, I just check if the
>>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:08:04PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> For professional usage cables usually have to be self-made. Btw. I once
> asked if Neutrik plastic cable relief does crumble all over the world
> after a while at LAU or LAD. Yes, they do. I switched to Rean.
Which is Neutrik made i
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 18:20 +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 23:49 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> >> Otherwise, we usually make our own cables.
> >
> > Private I sometimes buy ready to use cables, I just check if th
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:50:16 +0530
Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> Hi,
> *wall of text*
I, for one, welcome our new red hatted underlings.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 23:49 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
>> Otherwise, we usually make our own cables.
>
> Private I sometimes buy ready to use cables, I just check if the
> soldering joints are ok. It's less expensive, since in Germany we'
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 23:49 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> Otherwise, we usually make our own cables.
Private I sometimes buy ready to use cables, I just check if the
soldering joints are ok. It's less expensive, since in Germany we've got
an online retailer who sells equipment for less money.
On 13 August 2012 16:04, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:08:43AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
>> Of course bullshit is also rife and quite amusing sometimes. The same
>> pro audio world sells Ł10,000 gold power cables as thick as your arm and
>> then plugs them into a standar
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> It's said a fundamental problem with user space development is
> that often new projects are started because feature X is easier when
> starting from scratch and so your swapping rather than developing. Is
> that the case here or was there
> I see that linus torvalds will have competition pretty soon on who gets
> to be the overlord. Or maybe they can coexist, one in kernel land and
> the other in userspace land ;)
linus used to run binaries from his earliest days just to make sure
that they still worked and constantly iterates that
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 19:11 +0530, gt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:50:16PM +0530, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Another flame may start here, but I would like to present the following
> > as a pure news, no opinions[1].
> >
> > Of course, after reading all the discussions on the
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While building an Arch-based wireless router I ran into a problem of
> persistent NIC naming. To differentiate which interfaces go to WAN and LAN,
> I have created a simple udev rule like this
> /etc/udev/rules.d/10-network.ru
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:50:16PM +0530, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another flame may start here, but I would like to present the following
> as a pure news, no opinions[1].
>
> Of course, after reading all the discussions on the mailing lists, my
> feeling after reading the link? Mwuhah
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 08:59 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 07:56 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >>> On Aug 13, 2012 3:17 AM, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
> I've been wondering la
On 08/13/2012 07:56 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Aug 13, 2012 3:17 AM, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
I've been wondering lately whether there is a good reason why even udev
violates the "one thi
On 08/13/2012 07:50 AM, Gour wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:34:26 +0200
Joakim Hernberg wrote:
Alternatively we will all be running systemd one day whether we want
to or not :( I suspect that this has been the game plan all the time
though. OK, flames away I guess :)
Nobody to blame when we
On 08/13/2012 02:12 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Aug 13, 2012 3:17 AM, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
I've been wondering lately whether there is a good reason why even udev
violates the "one thing and do it well" principle set forth by the
co worker of the designer of C and Unix as it not only dynamic
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Aug 13, 2012 3:17 AM, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
>>> I've been wondering lately whether there is a good reason why even udev
>>> violates the "one thing and do it well" principle set fort
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:34:26 +0200
Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> Alternatively we will all be running systemd one day whether we want
> to or not :( I suspect that this has been the game plan all the time
> though. OK, flames away I guess :)
Nobody to blame when we do not listen BSD folks and have
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 12:21 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > Not that the pro audio world doesn't have its own share
> > of nonsense, but it's different nonsense.
>
> Yeah but that stuff is usually just irritating but the audiophile
> example is a little funny without explanation.
One hand washes
> > I've been wondering lately whether there is a good reason why even udev
> > violates the "one thing and do it well" principle set forth by the
> > co worker of the designer of C and Unix as it not only dynamically
> > creates devices like mdev does but also hotplugging like hotplugd on
> > Open
> Not that the pro audio world doesn't have its own share
> of nonsense, but it's different nonsense.
Yeah but that stuff is usually just irritating but the audiophile
example is a little funny without explanation.
--
___
'Writ
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> Too bad, we are either going to have to fork or look for an alternative to
> udev.
>
When upstream udev fails to live up to some distributions (see, Ubuntu, for
example) it *will* be forked.
Hopefully, udev-systemd and udev-ng (or whate
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:50:16 +0530
Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> (Yes, udev on non-systemd systems is in our eyes a dead end, in case
> you haven't noticed it yet. I am looking forward to the day when we
> can drop that support entirely.)"
Lennart in topform again...:( Well if that's the official sta
Hi,
Another flame may start here, but I would like to present the following
as a pure news, no opinions[1].
Of course, after reading all the discussions on the mailing lists, my
feeling after reading the link? Mwuhahahaha.
Important quotes from the link ( which I hope do not alter the contex
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 02:08 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> The same pro audio world sells £10,000 gold power cables as thick as
> your arm and then plugs them into a standard copper wall socket.
>
No, that are rich consumers. I don't think that all of those consumers
are stupid audiophiles, I gue
Ok, I know a lot of you cynics would say: "it's fine, why would do you want
Nepomuk running anyways!?"
The truth is my laptop HD went dead some days ago so I had to restore my
system from a 2-weeks old backup; I usually use fsarchiver to backup root
partition and 7z to compress ~/.kde4 so this way
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:08:43AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Of course bullshit is also rife and quite amusing sometimes. The same
> pro audio world sells £10,000 gold power cables as thick as your arm and
> then plugs them into a standard copper wall socket.
Nobody in the pro audio world fa
39 matches
Mail list logo
