On 08/04/2012 11:11 PM, rafael ff1 wrote:
> 2012/8/5 gt :
>> On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 08:46:05PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> After installing without AIF, I want to update the install wiki to drop a
>>> note
>>> about swap. It isn't addressed at all. What is the current Arch
>
2012/8/5 gt :
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 08:46:05PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> After installing without AIF, I want to update the install wiki to drop a
>> note
>> about swap. It isn't addressed at all. What is the current Arch
>> recommendation
>> regarding swap creation? I.E.:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 08:46:05PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> All,
>
> After installing without AIF, I want to update the install wiki to drop a
> note
> about swap. It isn't addressed at all. What is the current Arch recommendation
> regarding swap creation? I.E.: recommended for systems
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Jackson Alley wrote:
>
> I've rebooted and confirmed the udev rule I found does not resolve the
> issue. I don't believe the problem lies with mkinitcpio as I'm not using
> a root btrfs system but rather in the init scripts
> (https://projects.archlinux.org/initscri
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 8:46 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> All,
>
> After installing without AIF, I want to update the install wiki to drop a
> note
> about swap. It isn't addressed at all. What is the current Arch recommendation
> regarding swap creation? I.E.: recommended for systems w/less tha
On 04/08/12 at 08:43pm, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 08/04/2012 10:49 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> >> David, you are fairly active on the mailing lists, and it's amusing that
> >> > you totally missed the discussions related to the removal of AIF a few
> >> > weeks ago.
> > More to the point, as a maintai
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, David C. Rankin wrote:
All,
After installing without AIF, I want to update the install wiki to drop a note
about swap. It isn't addressed at all. What is the current Arch recommendation
regarding swap creation? I.E.: recommended for systems w/less that 1G of RAM,
create swa
All,
After installing without AIF, I want to update the install wiki to drop a note
about swap. It isn't addressed at all. What is the current Arch recommendation
regarding swap creation? I.E.: recommended for systems w/less that 1G of RAM,
create swap file of what size? (256M?) Even if swap is
On 08/04/2012 10:49 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>> David, you are fairly active on the mailing lists, and it's amusing that
>> > you totally missed the discussions related to the removal of AIF a few
>> > weeks ago.
> More to the point, as a maintainer of a fairly complicated set of packages,
> he should
On 08/04/2012 07:25 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Jackson Alley
> wrote:
>> I don't believe the problem lies with mkinitcpio as I'm not using
>> a root btrfs system but rather in the init scripts
>> (https://projects.archlinux.org/initscripts.git/commit/?id=13ca7f028a
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Jackson Alley wrote:
> I don't believe the problem lies with mkinitcpio as I'm not using
> a root btrfs system but rather in the init scripts
> (https://projects.archlinux.org/initscripts.git/commit/?id=13ca7f028ac775773a6685966d0faeee5cc55a9d).
Yeah, this is due t
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 03.08.2012 17:55, Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
>> I'll try to patch it tomorrow evening, along with PKGBUILD's manpage
>> and the wiki page.
>
> Wait for the next pacman version because all this VCS code is being
> rewritten. Check the pacman-
"David C. Rankin" writes:
> On 08/04/2012 01:20 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Use archboot if you need hand holding.
>>
>> greetings
>> tpowa
>
> No hand holding needed, just bewildered why Arch would ditch a tool that
> worked
> perfectly well. Further, the lack of an AIF type tool just make
cker
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=6
>
> It definitly needs a patch for the fact that grub is no longer a
> package in the repositories, the iso comming out soon, 20120804 will
> have grub2 on it so people with efi should be able to use it. The
> partitioning has been l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2012 01:20 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Use archboot if you need hand holding.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
No hand holding needed, just bewildered why Arch would ditch a tool that worked
perfectly well. Further, the lack of an AIF type tool just
On 08/04/2012 01:20 AM, Jason Ryan wrote:
> On 04/08/12 at 01:17am, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> What happened to the arch setup autoinstaller script that guided you though
>> the install process?? It was minimal, and worked very well to guide you
>> through.
>> Even helpful with raid i
On 4 Aug 2012 15:06, "gt" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 01:17:37AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > What happened to the arch setup autoinstaller script that guided you
though
> > the install process?? It was minimal, and worked very well to guide you
through.
> > Even helpfu
On 08/03/2012 09:11 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2012 7:56 PM, "Jackson Alley" wrote:
>> On 08/03/2012 08:50 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>> On Aug 3, 2012 5:32 PM, "Jackson Alley"
> wrote:
On 08/03/2012 06:20 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Jac
2012/8/1, Tobias Powalowski :
> Hi,
> please drop me an answer if you are interest in testing the next
> archboot release.
>
> Thanks
> greetings
> tpowa
>
> --
> Tobias Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> tp...@archlinux.org
>
>
>
want to to t
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 01:17:37AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What happened to the arch setup autoinstaller script that guided you though
> the install process?? It was minimal, and worked very well to guide you
> through.
> Even helpful with raid installs after your arrays were
20 matches
Mail list logo
