On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:26 AM, wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I've read all the arguments of Tom and Ionut. Here is my own $0.02 on
>> it. When I started using archlinux back in end of 2008, the winning
>> point was this file. A centralized one where you can set up a lot of
>> single options.
>>
>>
> Hello.
>
> I've read all the arguments of Tom and Ionut. Here is my own $0.02 on
> it. When I started using archlinux back in end of 2008, the winning
> point was this file. A centralized one where you can set up a lot of
> single options.
>
> It is *far* simpler to edit /etc/rc.conf to load dae
Hello.
I've read all the arguments of Tom and Ionut. Here is my own $0.02 on
it. When I started using archlinux back in end of 2008, the winning
point was this file. A centralized one where you can set up a lot of
single options.
It is *far* simpler to edit /etc/rc.conf to load daemons or modules
On Jul 21, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Did you even bother to read what Tom wrote? You can still use your old
> rc.conf. It is just recommend to use the new config files instead. This
> makes using initscripts and systemd in parallel easier. And there are
> not 9k co
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>
>> Tom:
>>
>> The concerns expressed by Evangelos and Tobias were some of the concerns I
>> had when the push towards systemd started. Systemd is great if you are
>> managing a larg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/12 15:34, John Briggs wrote:
> General Discussion about Arch Linux
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:41:08PM -0600, D. R. Evans wrote:
>>> pacman -Su
>>>
>>
>> Not OK:
>>
>>> [root@shack n7dr]# pacman -Su :: Starting full system
>>> upgra
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
>
> Tom:
>
> The concerns expressed by Evangelos and Tobias were some of the concerns I
> had when the push towards systemd started. Systemd is great if you are
> managing a large number of computers, but excessive overkill for one or two
> deskt
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Evangelos Foutras
> wrote:
> > I find removing most of the variables to be confusing and would
> > suggest that [1] and [2] get reverted.
>
> I'm not going to revert them outright, but we can discuss individ
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
> Op zaterdag 21 juli 2012 13:30:24 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
> > Worked well.
> > But did not solve the problem. Hibernation still seems to work at first,
> > but when I start the laptop it boots normally, fscks disks because of
> > uncle
On 07/21/2012 11:24 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:57 PM, D. R. Evans wrote:
I *think* that this means that in fact glibc owns all the files.
It means that no other package owns any files. It might still be that
there are files in /lib that are not owned by any package. pac
Ariel Popper said the following at 07/21/2012 09:24 AM :
> My reading comprehension may be lacking, but did you check to see if
> there are any files in /lib that are *not* owned by any package?
>
> find /lib -exec pacman -Qo -- {} +
>
> Commonly there are some directories like /lib/modules or
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:57 PM, D. R. Evans wrote:
> I *think* that this means that in fact glibc owns all the files.
It means that no other package owns any files. It might still be that
there are files in /lib that are not owned by any package. pacman -Qo
/lib/* should tell you (or simply "ls
Maybe I'm missing an instruction somewhere, but I don't see it.
Doc
My reading comprehension may be lacking, but did you check to see if
there are any files in /lib that are *not* owned by any package?
find /lib -exec pacman -Qo -- {} +
Commonly there are some directories like /lib/mod
Norbert Zeh said the following at 07/20/2012 05:34 PM :
>>
>>> pacman -Su
>>>
>>
>> Not OK:
>>
>>> [root@shack n7dr]# pacman -Su
>>> :: Starting full system upgrade...
>>> resolving dependencies...
>>> looking for inter-conflicts...
>>>
>>> Targets (1): glibc-2.16.0-2
>>>
>>> Total Installed Size:
Op zaterdag 21 juli 2012 13:30:24 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
> Hello Ike,
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:15:48PM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
> > Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 22:06:31 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
> > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:52:34PM -0400, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 a
General Discussion about Arch Linux
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:41:08PM -0600, D. R. Evans wrote:
> > pacman -Su
> >
>
> Not OK:
>
> > [root@shack n7dr]# pacman -Su
> > :: Starting full system upgrade...
> > resolving dependencies...
> > looking for inter-conflicts...
> >
> > Targets (1): gli
Hello Ike,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:15:48PM +0200, Ike Devolder wrote:
> Op vrijdag 20 juli 2012 22:06:31 schreef Arvid Warnecke:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:52:34PM -0400, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Arvid Warnecke wrote:
> > > > Is there an ideal wa
Rodrigo Rivas on Sat, 2012/07/21 00:36:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Rodrigo Rivas > wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> >
> >> Hello everybody,
> >>
> >> I am creating live media and want to reduce size. After
> >> removing /usr/include/ wicd fails to
On 2012/6/26 Rémy Oudompheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am going to put Texlive 2012 packages in [testing]. Texlive 2012 is
> not yet released, but it is frozen, so I do not expect changes to
> these packages except to fix packaging errors.
> Please try them and complain on mailing lists. Don't hesitat
On 20 July 2012 22:34, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> After going though the usrlib/glibc update and creating a new archroot for
> building, I am getting build failures in trinity k3b and k9copy. Both packages
> built without error on 7/14 prior to my update. Following update I experience
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
