On 06/10/2012 09:14 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Personally, I prefer mailing lists,
So do I.
Mailing list is, in my VERY humble opinion, the place where you find
higher quality discussion than on web forums.
But, that's just my opinion.
--
RMA.
El 10/06/12 20:35, Don deJuan escribió:
On 06/10/2012 05:30 PM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
El 10/06/12 20:18, John Briggs escribió:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:35:45AM +0800, 逸冰欧阳 wrote:
I also have the same problem. And remember that Ubuntu, Fedora work
well,
so I wonder whether it i
I find that If you don't input anything like hitting ENTER at 8th step ,
everything is OK.
On Jun 11, 2012 1:43 AM, "Mateusz Loskot" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been observing strange issues when I switch between X and TTY.
> Here is the step-by-step story with details:
>
> 0. Login to tty1 and ttt2
OK. I have some results from my machine here:
To access TTY from X
Ctl Alt F1 consistently returns to initial TTY running xinit process
Ctl Alt F2 cursor only but no login prompt
Ctl Alt F3 login prompt
Ctl Alt F4 login prompt
Ctl Alt F5 login prompt
Ctl Alt F6 login prompt
Ctl Alt F7 cursor only
C
On 11 June 2012 01:51, Sudaraka Wijesinghe
wrote:
> On 06/11/12 06:00, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
>> El 10/06/12 20:18, John Briggs escribió:
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:35:45AM +0800, 逸冰欧阳 wrote:
I also have the same problem. And remember that Ubuntu, Fedora work
well,
On 11 June 2012 01:35, Don deJuan wrote:
> On 06/10/2012 05:30 PM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
>> El 10/06/12 20:18, John Briggs escribió:
>>>
>>> What bug?
>>> The TTY running X is busy running the xinit/xsession process, until you
>>> kill that process you shouldn't be able to get the c
On 06/11/12 06:00, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
> El 10/06/12 20:18, John Briggs escribió:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:35:45AM +0800, 逸冰欧阳 wrote:
>>> I also have the same problem. And remember that Ubuntu, Fedora work
>>> well,
>>> so I wonder whether it is a bug.
>>> On Jun 11, 2012 4:2
On 06/10/2012 05:30 PM, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban wrote:
El 10/06/12 20:18, John Briggs escribió:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:35:45AM +0800, 逸冰欧阳 wrote:
I also have the same problem. And remember that Ubuntu, Fedora work
well,
so I wonder whether it is a bug.
On Jun 11, 2012 4:21 AM, "Mateu
El 10/06/12 20:18, John Briggs escribió:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:35:45AM +0800, 逸冰欧阳 wrote:
I also have the same problem. And remember that Ubuntu, Fedora work well,
so I wonder whether it is a bug.
On Jun 11, 2012 4:21 AM, "Mateusz Loskot" wrote:
On 10 June 2012 20:35, Sébastien le Prest
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:35:45AM +0800, 逸冰欧阳 wrote:
> I also have the same problem. And remember that Ubuntu, Fedora work well,
> so I wonder whether it is a bug.
> On Jun 11, 2012 4:21 AM, "Mateusz Loskot" wrote:
>
> > On 10 June 2012 20:35, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
> > wrote:
> > > El
Regarding the libusb / libusbx replacement, the following
may be of interest to authors using it:
I have one app using libusb, after the upgrade it consistently
segfaulted on calling libusb_exit(0).
The '0' argument in this call and some others means my code
was using the 'default context'. Usin
I also have the same problem. And remember that Ubuntu, Fedora work well,
so I wonder whether it is a bug.
On Jun 11, 2012 4:21 AM, "Mateusz Loskot" wrote:
> On 10 June 2012 20:35, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
> wrote:
> > El 10/06/12 14:11, Mateusz Loskot escribió:
> >> On 10 June 2012 19:03,
On 06/10/2012 01:21 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 10 June 2012 20:35, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
wrote:
El 10/06/12 14:11, Mateusz Loskot escribió:
On 10 June 2012 19:03, Javier Vasquez wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Mateusz Loskot
wrote:
I have been observing strange issues
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
> My .bashrc is:
>
> alias ls='ls --color=auto'
> [ ! "$UID" = "0" ] && archbey -c white
> [ "$UID" = "0" ] && archbey -c red
> #PS1="\[\e[01;31m\]??[\[\e[01;**35m\u\e[01;31m\]]??[\[\e[00;**
> 37m\]${HOSTNAME%%.*}\[\e[01;**32m
On 10 June 2012 20:35, Sébastien le Preste de Vauban
wrote:
> El 10/06/12 14:11, Mateusz Loskot escribió:
>> On 10 June 2012 19:03, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Mateusz Loskot
>>> wrote:
I have been observing strange issues when I switch between X and
When I run any terminal emulator for the first time after a reboot,
it takes a long time for Bash to come up, the window is blank for
10-20 seconds. On a quad AMD X4 with 4G RAM. Started after
updates, don't know which ones. Anyone got a suggestion, or a good
way to diagnose?
I've had a simi
El 10/06/12 14:11, Mateusz Loskot escribió:
On 10 June 2012 19:03, Javier Vasquez wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I have been observing strange issues when I switch between X and TTY.
[...]
I started noticing this same thing since last year (though don't
rememb
On 10 June 2012 19:40, Kwpolska wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
>>> On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
use the mailing lists in
On 10 June 2012 20:40, Kwpolska wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Mateusz Loskot
> wrote:
> > On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik
> > wrote:
> >> On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
> >>> use the mai
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
>> On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
>>> use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
>>> registe
On 10 June 2012 19:25, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
>> use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
>> registered to the Arch Forums?
>>
>> Can we have some basic mailing li
On Sunday 10 Jun 2012 19:14:19 Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
> use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
> registered to the Arch Forums?
>
> Can we have some basic mailing lists statistics anywhere posted?
>
> Personall
Hi,
I'm wondering, what amount of Arch users and developers
use the mailing lists in comparison to the number of people
registered to the Arch Forums?
Can we have some basic mailing lists statistics anywhere posted?
Personally, I prefer mailing lists, but I noticed the Forums traffic
is order of
On 10 June 2012 19:03, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> I have been observing strange issues when I switch between X and TTY.
>> [...]
>
> I started noticing this same thing since last year (though don't
> remember when exactly). Never asked c
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been observing strange issues when I switch between X and TTY.
> Here is the step-by-step story with details:
>
> 0. Login to tty1 and ttt2
> 1. From tty2 (not tty1), startx with either i3wm or Openbox
> 2. Launch 2-3 apps (e
Hi,
I have been observing strange issues when I switch between X and TTY.
Here is the step-by-step story with details:
0. Login to tty1 and ttt2
1. From tty2 (not tty1), startx with either i3wm or Openbox
2. Launch 2-3 apps (e.g. urxvt, Firefox)
3. Switch back to tty1 (CTRL+ALT+F1)
4. Execute so
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 06/10/2012 05:23 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>
>> Javier Vasquez wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I've been using the original cdrecord (cdrtools) for more than 10
>
> cdrtools aka wodim work fine.
>
Is "aka" a synonym for "I'm a troll"?
I'm using Gnome and cat /var/log/messages.log shows following:
Jun 11 00:46:33 localhost kernel: [27115.671006] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc]
15564800 512-byte logical blocks: (7.96 GB/7.42 GiB)
Jun 11 00:46:33 localhost kernel: [27115.675124] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write
cache: enabled, read cache: enabled,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:03:53 +0800
GSC wrote:
> After recent update of linux-lts to 3.0.33, it fails to auto mount my
> android device as usb storage(moto atrix2). My other usb devices are
> auto mounted successfully, just this one fail to auto mount every
> time. It can be manually mount succes
and is not jailbroken.
The system has installed:
linux-lqx 3.4.2-1
ifuse 1.1.2-1
libimobiledevice-git 20120610-1
usbmuxd-git 20120610-1
libplist 1.8-2
I boot up the system (fuse module is loaded at startup), unlock the
iPhone, and connect it to the system. I got:
usb 2-2: new high-speed USB
> On 06/10/2012 09:01 AM, Florian Pritz wrote:
>> On 08.06.2012 21:54, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>> signoffs are done, anything that stops us from moving to new kernel series?
>>
>> My nfs problems (bad file contents) seem to be fixed with 3.4.2.
>>
It seems some may still be having
On 06/10/2012 05:23 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Javier Vasquez wrote:
Hi,
I've been using the original cdrecord (cdrtools) for more than 10
years now, however I hadn't burned anything in the last 3 months (or
even more). With the current linux kernel image from Arch:
% uname -a
Linux jvasque
On 10 June 2012 14:05, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> It works the same with initscripts and with systemd.
>
> It is strictly speaking not udev that loads these modules but a
> separate tool: /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-modules-load, which is shipped
> in the same package as udev (systemd-tools).
Great, I'l
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> Tom, I don't know much about this modules-load.d stuff. Does it work
> with plain udev? Otherwise it wouldn't help much including that file
> for users that doesn't use systemd (and I'm one of them).
It works the same with initscripts and
On 10 June 2012 11:57, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> The module-load.d directory is supported by us, as well as all distros
> using systemd. So Jörg, you might consider including this upstream, if
> it is the sg module is really needed.
Tom, Jörg,
nice to see you two interested.
Tom, I don't know much
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> Why should someone call an important driver "legacy"?
I assume it is because it has some problems, and has been replaced by
something else. But you'd have to take it up with the udev maintainer,
as he is the one who made the change, or th
On 10 juin 2012, at 07:12, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 06/09/2012 11:57 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> "Those udev rules were moved to /usr/lib/udev/rules.d, so
>> --with-udev-dir=/usr/lib/udev might be a better option."
>>
>> That makes sense -- I'll give it a go.
>
> Tried, still failed - out
Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Jörg, Luká??,
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Joerg Schilling
> wrote:
> > Looks like a missconfigured kernel that does not include support for or
> > for some strange reason does not load the SCSI generic driver
>
> Our kernel does in fact include the "sg" module. H
Jörg, Lukáš,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> Looks like a missconfigured kernel that does not include support for or
> for some strange reason does not load the SCSI generic driver
Our kernel does in fact include the "sg" module. However, it is
considered "legacy" [0]
Javier Vasquez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using the original cdrecord (cdrtools) for more than 10
> years now, however I hadn't burned anything in the last 3 months (or
> even more). With the current linux kernel image from Arch:
>
> % uname -a
> Linux jvasquez14 3.3.8-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue
After recent update of linux-lts to 3.0.33, it fails to auto mount my
android device as usb storage(moto atrix2). My other usb devices are auto
mounted successfully, just this one fail to auto mount every time. It can
be manually mount successfully. And I tried linux kernel(3.3.8), auto
mounted su
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> On 10 June 2012 01:41, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been using the original cdrecord (cdrtools) for more than 10
>> years now, however I hadn't burned anything in the last 3 months (or
>> even more). With the current linux kern
On 10 June 2012 01:41, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using the original cdrecord (cdrtools) for more than 10
> years now, however I hadn't burned anything in the last 3 months (or
> even more). With the current linux kernel image from Arch:
>
> % uname -a
> Linux jvasquez14 3.3.8-1-AR
43 matches
Mail list logo
