On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 00:52:31 -0500
Myra Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:08 PM, P .NIKOLIC
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:52:25 -0500
> > "David C. Rankin" wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/07/2012 02:35 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> >> > Thanks folks ..
> >> >
> >> > Now to tackle the laptop and
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:08 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:52:25 -0500
> "David C. Rankin" wrote:
>
>> On 06/07/2012 02:35 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
>> > Thanks folks ..
>> >
>> > Now to tackle the laptop and get it ready for a couple of months
>> > duty whilst laid up in dang hosp
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 08:08:43PM +0530, Sudaraka Wijesinghe wrote:
> On 06/07/12 19:52, gt wrote:
> >
> > I am getting the following error:
> >
> > linux-headers-3.3.8-1-i686.pkg.tar.xz: invalid or corrupted package (PGP
> > signature)
>
> I believe you need to download the corresponding .sig
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30181
Non-breaking space, 0x00a0 needs to be replaced with actual space, 0x0020
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
On 06/07/12 11:36, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 06/06/2012 04:17 PM, David Benfell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just got the latest update to the cups package. I've been being
>> bitten by the "rendering completed" bug for (I think) the last
>> thr
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:52:25 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 02:35 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> > Thanks folks..
> >
> > Now to tackle the laptop and get it ready for a couple of months
> > duty whilst laid up in dang hospital ..
> >
> > Pete .
>
> Advise,
>
>'Stay out of the
2012/6/7 David C. Rankin :
> On 06/05/2012 04:20 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>>
>> Is there a benefit to the AUR version over the Community version? They
>> should be feature equivalent now.
>>
>
> I always thought you had to use the aur version for usb functionality. May
> have changed, but I hav
On 06/07/2012 02:35 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
Thanks folks..
Now to tackle the laptop and get it ready for a couple of months duty
whilst laid up in dang hospital ..
Pete .
Advise,
'Stay out of the hospital!' -> they only make you sicker there... Good luck
and a speedy recovery.
--
Davi
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:04:10 +0100
"P .NIKOLIC" wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below
> is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run
> is it safe to delete them to update .
>
>
>
> resolving dependencies...
> looking for inter-con
I have just updated my system earlier today - it seems to boot OK
apart from a warning and Fail flag where the daemons start (in the
list before graphical X starts) about an erroneous line 1 in
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/dovecot.conf which only has one line in my system:
d /var/run/dovecot 0755 root dovec
On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:08 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:04 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below
>> is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run
>> is it safe to delete them to update .
>>
>>
>
On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:06 PM, Kacper Żuk wrote:
> W dniu 07.06.2012 21:04, P .NIKOLIC pisze:
>> Hi
>>
>> Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below
>> is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run
>> is it safe to delete them to update .
>>
>
> Check
> ht
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:04 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below
> is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run
> is it safe to delete them to update .
>
>
According to the posts I saw the way forward is to do (as root):
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:04 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below
> ...
>
> Targets (6): filesystem-2012.6-2 git-1.7.10.4-1 icu-49.1.2-1
> krb5-1.10.2-1 libsystemd-185-1 systemd-tools-185-1
>
> ...
> 100% error: failed to commit transaction (c
W dniu 07.06.2012 21:04, P .NIKOLIC pisze:
Hi
Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below
is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run
is it safe to delete them to update .
Check
http://www.archlinux.org/news/filesystem-upgrade-manual-intervention-requ
Hi
Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below
is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run
is it safe to delete them to update .
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (6): filesystem-2012.6-2 git-1.7.10.4-1 icu-49.1.2-1
kr
On 06/05/2012 04:20 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Is there a benefit to the AUR version over the Community version? They
should be feature equivalent now.
I always thought you had to use the aur version for usb functionality. May
have changed, but I have just always used the aur package with
On 06/06/2012 04:17 PM, David Benfell wrote:
Hi,
Just got the latest update to the cups package. I've been being bitten
by the "rendering completed" bug for (I think) the last three
revisions. This hasn't fixed it.
What I had found previously was that this seemed to be an upstream bug
in which
Am Donnerstag, den 07.06.2012, 10:51 +0200 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> >
> anyone for i686?
Works fine here on my laptop.
--
xmpp: b...@schafweide.org
bjo.nord-west.org | nord-west.org | freifunk-ol.de
On 06/07/12 19:52, gt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:51:26AM +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Am 06.06.2012 17:13, schrieb Sudaraka Wijesinghe:
>>> On 06/06/12 18:31, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.3.8 series for both arches.
package is not in testing, plea
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:51:26AM +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am 06.06.2012 17:13, schrieb Sudaraka Wijesinghe:
> > On 06/06/12 18:31, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >> please signoff 3.3.8 series for both arches.
> >> package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
> >> http:
Am 06.06.2012 17:13, schrieb Sudaraka Wijesinghe:
> On 06/06/12 18:31, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> please signoff 3.3.8 series for both arches.
>> package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
>> http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/
>>
>> This will move to [core] directly, beca
[ Erf, resending to general list. This forbidden write access to the dev
list is somewhat frustrating. ]
The 06/06/12, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Well, I'm not sure if this would make life simpler,
> A current x86_64 base install is 119 packages with 450MB do you still
> want to fragment this?
On 5 June 2012 22:54, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
>
> Speaking as an Arch user who is just barely competent enough for Arch with
> much dependence on google and Arch's most excellent wiki, I'd like to see
> Arch continue to do what I see as one of it's strong points.
>
> Yes it insists on it's u
24 matches
Mail list logo
