On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 07:08:59PM -0500, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
> When I run any terminal emulator for the first time after a reboot,
> it takes a long time for Bash to come up, the window is blank for
> 10-20 seconds. On a quad AMD X4 with 4G RAM. Started after
> updates, don't know which
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jonathan E. Brickman
wrote:
> When I run any terminal emulator for the first time after a reboot, it takes
> a long time for Bash to come up, the window is blank for 10-20 seconds. On
> a quad AMD X4 with 4G RAM. Started after updates, don't know which ones.
> An
When I run any terminal emulator for the first time after a reboot, it
takes a long time for Bash to come up, the window is blank for 10-20
seconds. On a quad AMD X4 with 4G RAM. Started after updates, don't
know which ones. Anyone got a suggestion, or a good way to diagnose?
--
Jonathan E.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Just got the latest update to the cups package. I've been being bitten
by the "rendering completed" bug for (I think) the last three
revisions. This hasn't fixed it.
What I had found previously was that this seemed to be an upstream bug
in which
On 06/06/12 18:31, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> please signoff 3.3.8 series for both arches.
> package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
> http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/
>
> This will move to [core] directly, because 3.4.1 is in [testing].
>
> greetings
> tpowa
>
Jus
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.3.8 series for both arches.
package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/
This will move to [core] directly, because 3.4.1 is in [testing].
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa
On 6 June 2012 10:59, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, I apologies if this is not the right place to send this post,
> but I couldn't find how to reach the Flyspray admins.
> [...]
FYI, I also forwarded this post to the "Forum & Wiki discussion":
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21:35:15 +1000
John Briggs wrote:
> MS Windows needs secure boot because it is subject to so many malware
> attacks, Arch Linux does not.
Not true. MS needs it more and may well have other motives for how it
is designed like stopping customers from going back to the
shop and in
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 04:54:58PM -0400, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
>
> It would appear that on Jun 4, Alexandre Ferrando did say:
>
> > On 4 June 2012 22:27, Sudaraka Wijesinghe
> > wrote:
> > > If this is a poll, I vote "Arch should require Secure Boot to be disabled"
> > >
> > > I choose
Hi,
First, I apologies if this is not the right place to send this post,
but I couldn't find how to reach the Flyspray admins.
Yesterday, I tried to register on Flyspray.
I have received the confirmation e-mail, followed the confirmation steps
and something weird happened.
I'm neither able to log
10 matches
Mail list logo
