Am Fri, 25 May 2012 21:41:08 +0200
schrieb Jakob Wadsager :
> gwdg.de is upstream for some of the mirrors in your mirrorlist, and it
> had problems. I've been in contact with an admin earlier this day and
> it seems the problems have been resolved. The third in your mirrorlist
> (archlinux.limun.o
On 25 May 2012 19:10, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Unfortunately I use none of those mirrors. So uk2.net couldn't be the
> reason.
gwdg.de is upstream for some of the mirrors in your mirrorlist, and it
had problems. I've been in contact with an admin earlier this day and
it seems the problems have been
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 25 May 2012 12:26:02 +0200
> schrieb Jakob Wadsager :
>
>> On 25 May 2012 10:09, Heiko Baums wrote:
>> > Is there a problem with the mirrors and their synchronization or
>> > with the package database?
>>
>> Our uk2.net mirror has some
Am Fri, 25 May 2012 12:26:02 +0200
schrieb Jakob Wadsager :
> On 25 May 2012 10:09, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Is there a problem with the mirrors and their synchronization or
> > with the package database?
>
> Our uk2.net mirror has some problems. For this reason we have added a
> new tier 1 mirror
Am Fri, 25 May 2012 16:19:54 +0200
schrieb Bjoern Franke :
> Do you mean mir.archlinux.fr?
Yes.
Heiko
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:25:42 +0200
Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Thomas Bächler
> wrote:
> > Am 25.05.2012 14:56, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> >> Hi got this feature request:
> >> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/2
> >>
> >> - fedora ditched the libusb usage in favou
Hi,
>
> It's not only the German mirrors, it's at least one French mirror, too.
Do you mean mir.archlinux.fr?
> > Server = http://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
>
> Server = http://mirror.archlinux.no/$repo/os/$arch seems to work, too.
http://mirror.devnu11.net/archlinux/ does a
On Fri, 25 May 2012 12:26:02 +0200
Jakob Wadsager wrote:
> The mirrors that sync of
> uk2[1]
Syncing Demand probably explains why UK2 was sometimes slow late at
night (early morning).
On 25 May 2012 10:09, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Is there a problem with the mirrors and their synchronization or with
> the package database?
Our uk2.net mirror has some problems. For this reason we have added a
new tier 1 mirror (hosted by LeaseWeb). The mirrors that sync of
uk2[1] will hopefully soo
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Axilleas Pi wrote:
> I had the same problem. I think the problem is with ftp mirrors. Try one
> http and see how it goes. At least, one I tried solved this problem.
>
I also had this problem with the Spanish Rediris, and it is an HTTP mirror.
I've changed to ano
Am Fri, 25 May 2012 14:45:22 +0300
schrieb Axilleas Pi :
> I had the same problem. I think the problem is with ftp mirrors. Try
> one http and see how it goes. At least, one I tried solved this
> problem.
I forgot to mention this, I admit, but I only use http mirrors.
Heiko
On 21-05-2012 14:21, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Upstream changes:
> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
>
> The x86_32 switch is not yet enabled.
>
> Please report any issues that arise.
> Thanks.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
Everything seems to be running fine here (installed only
lin
On Fri, 25 May 2012 11:07:24 +0200
Heiko Baums wrote:
> Like I've written in my first e-mail this didn't help me.
mirror.bytemark.co.uk has the 3.3.6 package too from the 13th I think.
Newest package I saw very quickly so take with a grain of salt was from
the 21st.
I'd work down from the root s
On 05/25/2012 12:07 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 25 May 2012 11:02:29 +0200
> schrieb Patrick Steinhardt :
>
>> I've experienced the same problems. I was able to solve the problem by
>> forcing database-updates with 'pacman -Syy'.
> Like I've written in my first e-mail this didn't help me.
>
>
Am Fri, 25 May 2012 11:02:29 +0200
schrieb Patrick Steinhardt :
> I've experienced the same problems. I was able to solve the problem by
> forcing database-updates with 'pacman -Syy'.
Like I've written in my first e-mail this didn't help me.
Heiko
Hi,
I've experienced the same problems. I was able to solve the problem by
forcing database-updates with 'pacman -Syy'.
Regards,
Patrick
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 25 May 2012 10:36:36 +0200
> schrieb Maximilian Bräutigam :
>
>> I discovered the same problem
Am Fri, 25 May 2012 10:36:36 +0200
schrieb Maximilian Bräutigam :
> I discovered the same problem for German mirrors. Finally, I got my
> kernel 3.3.7 from
It's not only the German mirrors, it's at least one French mirror, too.
> Server = http://mirrors.kernel.org/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch
Serv
Am 25.05.2012 10:09, schrieb Heiko Baums:
Is there a problem with the mirrors and their synchronization or with
the package database?
Since a while pacman tells me that my package databases for all repos
are up-to-date. The latest version of linux in those databases is linux
3.3.6-1 while the la
Is there a problem with the mirrors and their synchronization or with
the package database?
Since a while pacman tells me that my package databases for all repos
are up-to-date. The latest version of linux in those databases is linux
3.3.6-1 while the latest version in [core] should be 3.3.7-1 acc
19 matches
Mail list logo
