Hello,
please, consider the following output of part of mine /etc/passwd:
$ sudo grep ':/:' /etc/passwd
cron:x:22:22::/:/bin/false
dbus:x:81:81:System message bus:/:/bin/false
hal:x:82:82:HAL daemon:/:/bin/false
avahi:x:84:84:Avahi daemon:/:/bin/false
nobody:x:99:99:nobody:/:/bin/false
dnsmasq:x:
> I've noticed recently that a lot of upgrades have been making the
> total installed size go down. Has something changed in the packaging,
> like compressed binaries or a new version of GCC or something? I'm
> just curious.
not any more
Targets (33): acpid-2.0.16-1 avr-binutils-2.22-3 avr-gcc-
On 17/04/12 00:37, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:58:36 +0200
> Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>
>> (especially on 32bit).
>
>
> Slightly on 32bit and almost no difference on 64bit. OpenBSD uses PIEs
> everywhere and my x86 users say everythings much quicker than Windows.
>
Care to def
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:37:13 +0100
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:58:36 +0200
> Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>
> > (especially on 32bit).
>
>
> Slightly on 32bit and almost no difference on 64bit. OpenBSD uses PIEs
> everywhere and my x86 users say everythings much quicker than Windo
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:58:36 +0200
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> (especially on 32bit).
Slightly on 32bit and almost no difference on 64bit. OpenBSD uses PIEs
everywhere and my x86 users say everythings much quicker than Windows.
Fair enough though as long as you do have a good understanding of the
On 16 April 2012 11:39, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> With more and more distros and even android employing gccs -fpie for
> building packages, should Arch consider enabling it.
>
> For my users it would mean less programs being killed by the
> grsecurity kernel due to text relocation attempts. No com
With more and more distros and even android employing gccs -fpie for
building packages, should Arch consider enabling it.
For my users it would mean less programs being killed by the
grsecurity kernel due to text relocation attempts. No complaints yet as
I have a sandboxed flash browser but event
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:13:41 +0530
gt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 08:22:03AM +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> > -rwxr-sr-x 1 root locate 39512 Mar 3 05:53 /usr/bin/locate
> >
> > it is running with the default as you can see this is getting a bit
> > strange to say the least think the next i
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 08:22:03AM +0100, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> -rwxr-sr-x 1 root locate 39512 Mar 3 05:53 /usr/bin/locate
>
> it is running with the default as you can see this is getting a bit
> strange to say the least think the next is going to be uninstall and
> reinstall it see if that he
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:53:21 +0100
Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 15-04-2012 23:10, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:49:45 +0200
> > Martti Kühne wrote:
> >
> > something failing on my guess would be a changed permission
> > somewhere althou i dont mess around with permissions outside of
10 matches
Mail list logo
