Wow. I'm afraid that's way out of my league. :\
Instead of all my separate gists, this may be a little easier if anyone
wants to poke at the install scripts.
https://github.com/jpoehls/Parallels-7-Tools-for-Linux-2.6 -- I checked in
all of the scripts (I think) and only skipped what looked to be a
Not to butt in, but this tickled my memory and made me think of this:
https://github.com/organik/Parallels-for-Arch-Linux which seems to not
have been touched in 5 months but I believe attempts to tackle the
problem you're having. I don't have time to mess around with this
right now, but
https://
Ah. Here are a few more. There are others but the look like the handle the
xserver stuff specifically, I can post them if needed.
install-kmod.shhttps://gist.github.com/2307362
install-tools.sh https://gist.github.com/2307365
install-service.sh https://gist.github.com/2307369
--
Joshua Poe
Rest of the install script stack please. Especially install-tools.sh and
install-kmod.sh. No references top your install error on that part of the
installer stack, you posted.
Here is the ./install script. https://gist.github.com/2306919
--
Joshua Poehls
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Jesse Jaara wrote:
> Clearly parallels doesn't have support for Arch's Pacman packagemanager.
> Post the install script top some pastebin service so some one can take a
> look on it
Clearly parallels doesn't have support for Arch's Pacman packagemanager.
Post the install script top some pastebin service so some one can take a
look on it and see what it actually does, so you can manually install the
stuff. Just don't I use pastebin.com some archers don't line it and will
comple
I just installed Arch in Parallels 7 following the beginner's guide on the
wiki. Went great and I'm up and running (without xorg so far).
I want to install the Parallels Tools but I'm having some problems. I've
mounted the tools but the install script is failing with a rather generic
error "Some c
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 17:17:08 -0500
Nicholas MIller wrote:
> > OpenBSD is my favourite option for servers but not for nfsv4. Do you
> > need file locking or can you use something like sftp (ssh file
> > transfer)?
>
> why don't you like OpenBSD for nfs?
OpenBSD only supports nfsv3. I don't thi
On Apr 4, 2012 5:17 PM, "Nicholas MIller" wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Kevin Chadwick
wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:10:12 -0400
> > Kaiting Chen wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah run each service as an unprivileged user and you should be fine.
If
> > > security is very critical than ru
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Kevin Chadwick
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:10:12 -0400
> Kaiting Chen wrote:
>
> > Yeah run each service as an unprivileged user and you should be fine. If
> > security is very critical than run something like SELinux or a similar
RBAC
> > system.
>
> If you do
On 04/04/2012 09:15 PM, David wrote:
I have installed Awesome WM, and now i get very strange artifacts while
resizing or moving windows OR having mplayer on full screen gives a lot
of huge lines and flicker, making it impossible to watch movies.
Nvidia 9500m proprietary driver.
-ck kernel(vanil
>
> I am not sure where i should ask question like that, please tell me if its
> shouldn't be there.
>
it seems to be related to awesome. You should probably ask it on it's
mailing list or IRC channel listed here:
http://awesome.naquadah.org/community/
I am not sure where i should ask question like that, please tell me if its
shouldn't be there.
I have installed Awesome WM, and now i get very strange artifacts while
resizing or moving windows OR having mplayer on full screen gives a lot of
huge lines and flicker, making it impossible to
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:44:33 +0100
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:20:01 +0200
> Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
> > In that case they'll use whatever udisks2 uses, yes.
>
> Does udisk2 support custom filesystem options? Though to be honest I'll
> probably stick with my udev rules anyway as
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:20:01 +0200
Tom Gundersen wrote:
> In that case they'll use whatever udisks2 uses, yes.
Does udisk2 support custom filesystem options? Though to be honest I'll
probably stick with my udev rules anyway as I much prefer guaranteed
easy to type directory names like /media/usb[0
On 2012-04-04 15:20, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> In that case they'll use whatever udisks2 uses, yes. AFAIU the current
> dir might be a stop-gap solution, and the devs are considering using
> $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/media/LABEL in the end. That would mean:
> /run/USER/media/LABEL.
No, AFAIK, $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:10:12 -0400
Kaiting Chen wrote:
> Yeah run each service as an unprivileged user and you should be fine. If
> security is very critical than run something like SELinux or a similar RBAC
> system.
If you don't mind compiling a kernel, grsecurity and it's accompanying
rbac or u
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
> It depends. I usually mount USB flash using pcmanfm, thunar or nautilus
> then run krusader (doh, until now I didn't know how to mount USB sticks
> using krusader) and work with the stick.
>
> Nevermind, krusader like dolphin uses /media to m
Hello,
** Tom Gundersen [2012-04-04 13:03:19 +0200]:
> On Apr 4, 2012 11:14 AM, "David" wrote:
>> On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:05:55 +0300, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> On Apr 4, 2012 4:46 AM, "Vladimir Lomov" wrote:
Hello,
after system upgrade (seems after 2012-04-02) all USB flashes are
>
On Apr 4, 2012 11:14 AM, "David" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:05:55 +0300, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> On Apr 4, 2012 4:46 AM, "Vladimir Lomov" wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> after system upgrade (seems after 2012-04-02) all USB flashes are
>>> mounted in /run/media/USER/LABEL instead of /medi
Tobias Powalowski writes:
> Hi guys,
> please signoff 3.2.14 series for both arches.
> package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
> http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/
>
> This will move to [core] directly, because 3.3.1 is in [testing].
>
> greetings
> tpowa
Signoff.
--
Carl Lei
Looking at your originating mail, you seem to have both udisks and
udisks2 installed. Simply removing udisk2 and sticking with udisks
should be sufficient here.
2012/4/4, David :
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:05:55 +0300, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> On Apr 4, 2012 4:46 AM, "Vladimir Lomov" wrote:
>>>
>
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:05:55 +0300, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Apr 4, 2012 4:46 AM, "Vladimir Lomov" wrote:
Hello,
after system upgrade (seems after 2012-04-02) all USB flashes are
mounted in /run/media/USER/LABEL instead of /media/LABEL that was
previously. Is it intentional or is it a bug?
On Apr 4, 2012 4:46 AM, "Vladimir Lomov" wrote:
>
> Hello,
> after system upgrade (seems after 2012-04-02) all USB flashes are
> mounted in /run/media/USER/LABEL instead of /media/LABEL that was
> previously. Is it intentional or is it a bug?
This is intentional. It is done by udisks2, while udi
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.2.14 series for both arches.
package is not in testing, please grab it from here:
http://dev.archlinux.org/~tpowa/linux/
This will move to [core] directly, because 3.3.1 is in [testing].
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpow
25 matches
Mail list logo
