Hello Don,
Excerpts from Don deJuan's message of Thu Feb 23 07:35:52 +0100 2012:
> What is considered the Arch way to have version control over the configs
> in /etc? I would like to be able to see at least a few changes back in
> my config history at the minimum.
I too keep my /etc directory
What is considered the Arch way to have version control over the configs
in /etc? I would like to be able to see at least a few changes back in
my config history at the minimum.
I have seen the package etckeeper and it does not seem to really fully
be setup to work with pacman. Both AUR packag
Thanks Jesse,
I'm afraid there's no wifi switch in BIOS. Actually, BIOS options related
to LAN/WLAN are as follows:
LAN powersaving: disable
Embedded WLAN Device Radio: enable
Network Interface Controller(LAN): enable
LAN/WLAN Switching: enable
Wake on LAN: enable
I tried to toggle these options
On 02/22/2012 06:01 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> This happens if you don't provide all the necessary information when
> starting a thread.
Noted, I actually thought to do it but forgot to type it. (parentism)
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:53:32PM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 03:44 PM, rara8a...@aol.com wrote:
> > Try two digit numbers: 00 03 * * * and is your directory /etc/cron-daily or
> > /etc/cron.daily?
> >
>
> it's dcron, and on my box the updatedb file is in cron.daily:
>
> 17:
All,
I have always used the following prompt because it provides and immediate
cut-n-paste for ssh or rsync directory information:
User:
PS1="\[\e[0;37m\]\A\[\e[1;34m\] \h:\w> \[\e[0m\]"
Root:
PS1="\[\e[1;34m\][\[\e[1;31m\]\A \[\e[1;34m\]\h\[\e[0;31m\]:\w\[\e[1;34m\]] #
\[\e[0m\]"
Lately
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:54:49PM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 02/22/2012 03:49 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
> >
> > `man 5 anacrontab`.
> >
>
> [17:51 providence:/home/david/tde/bld/trinity-tqtinterface] # man 5 anacrontab
> No manual entry for anacrontab in section 5
>
> Bummer :)
>
>
On 02/22/2012 03:49 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
>
> `man 5 anacrontab`.
>
[17:51 providence:/home/david/tde/bld/trinity-tqtinterface] # man 5 anacrontab
No manual entry for anacrontab in section 5
Bummer :)
This box still has dcron on it.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On 02/22/2012 03:44 PM, rara8a...@aol.com wrote:
> Try two digit numbers: 00 03 * * * and is your directory /etc/cron-daily or
> /etc/cron.daily?
>
it's dcron, and on my box the updatedb file is in cron.daily:
17:48 providence:~/tde/bld/trinity-tqtinterface> l /etc/cron.daily/
total 36
drwxr-x
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:26:40PM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What is the best way to set the cron.daily items to run at 3 am.
> Currently they run at 3 pm which is a pain. I have checked the
> cron.daily entries and the other /etc/cron.x directories, but I
> can't find a time set
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:26:40PM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What is the best way to set the cron.daily items to run at 3 am.
> Currently they run at 3 pm which is a pain. I have checked the
> cron.daily entries and the other /etc/cron.x directories, but I
> can't find a time set
On Feb 22, 2012 11:26 PM, "David C. Rankin"
wrote:
>
> 0 3 * * * /root/cron/cron-daily
How about 0 15 * * *?
>
> Is this where this needs to go?
>
> --
> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
--
Thanasis Georgiou
Guys,
What is the best way to set the cron.daily items to run at 3 am. Currently
they run at 3 pm which is a pain. I have checked the cron.daily entries and
the other /etc/cron.x directories, but I can't find a time setting anywhere. I
have checked man crond and crontab, but I didn't find a
Hi
Does anyone know what the plans might be for apache 2.4 in testing?
Thanks!
gene
On Feb 22, 2012 7:05 PM, "Leonid Isaev" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:33:24 +0100
> Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Leonid Isaev
wrote:
> > > The package-owner it 'filesystem'. But I disagree with the proposal
because
> >
> > I'm not really sure what you are disag
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:33:24 +0100
Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > The package-owner it 'filesystem'. But I disagree with the proposal because
>
> I'm not really sure what you are disagreeing with...
>
> > (1) /var/run is a symlink, not a separat
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> The package-owner it 'filesystem'. But I disagree with the proposal because
I'm not really sure what you are disagreeing with...
> (1) /var/run is a symlink, not a separate FS and (2) initscripts should
> accomplish the minimum required oper
2012/2/22 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) :
> 2012/2/22 Allan McRae :
>> On 22/02/12 12:24, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
>>> Due to /var/run now is a tmp filesystem, so the path /var/run/* should
>>> not be packaged anymore. Instead, rc.script should take care aware
>>> create needed /var/run stuff. Otherwise, t
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:55:53 +0800
郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
> 2012/2/22 Allan McRae :
> > On 22/02/12 12:24, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
> >> Due to /var/run now is a tmp filesystem, so the path /var/run/* should
> >> not be packaged anymore. Instead, rc.script should take care aware
> >> create
Your BIOS migt contain a wifi swich
Sent from my phone. Sorry for any spelling mistakes
Hi guys,
After switching from Linux Mint to Archlinux, my wireless card refused to
show up in lspci. It DOES worked fine under Linux Mint, but Below is
my output of 'lspci -vnn |grep Broadcom' :
10:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetLink BCM5787M Gigabit
Ethernet PCI Express (
21 matches
Mail list logo
