2012/1/31 David C. Rankin :
> Guys,
>
> It seems one of the latest updates did something to the little triangle
> thread markers in thunderbird that show when a thread has responses. Now the
> triangles for collapsed threads look like little squiglies. The downward
> facing triangles showing expan
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:36:58 +0100
Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > Or a bind-mount from /var/media or such... I wonder though shouldn't it be
> > implemented in initscripts similar to /tmp? Because currently enabling
> > read-only / will require ad
Hi ..
I am getting the following error on mail check
Local Folders: Error opening:
This folder is missing .
I also get complaints about unable to delete (long number) on Kmail2 startup
not sure if it is related but i have also had big problems with Akondai when
trying to add my saved calender
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:37:20 +0100
Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> > It is there. I did a more /FORT rather than grep
> > It seems there is a difference here between OpenBSD and Arches more.
>
> more +/FORT /etc/makepkg.conf works as expected, but indeed searching
> while viewing yields 'pattern not fou
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Or a bind-mount from /var/media or such... I wonder though shouldn't it be
> implemented in initscripts similar to /tmp? Because currently enabling
> read-only / will require adding a /media stanza to fstab.
It would be a reasonable thing to
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:50:27 +0100
Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Kevin Chadwick
> wrote:
> > Should /bin and /sbin contain all the statically built execs to
> > increase the reliability of single user mode.
>
> Nah, we don't really build static binaries,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> It is there. I did a more /FORT rather than grep
> It seems there is a difference here between OpenBSD and Arches more.
more +/FORT /etc/makepkg.conf works as expected, but indeed searching
while viewing yields 'pattern not found' for many
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:31:17 +
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Glad I've found this. It seems there is a difference here between
> OpenBSD and Arches more. On OpenBSD it searches what's displayed too.
I'll use less from now on it's better anyway
--
Kc
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:43:37 +0100
Tom Gundersen wrote:
> E.g. who is making sure the disk is unmounted before it
> is unplugged
> (yanking it out whilst mounting/fsck'ing does not sound like a good idea btw)?
Yeah, I found this out, of course nothing is psychic and can prepare
for that but you d
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:36:54 +0200
Ionut Biru wrote:
> > I couldn't find it in makepkg.conf anyway?
> >
>
> maybe you didn't merge makepkg.conf.pacnew.
It is there. I did a more /FORT rather than grep and it was
on the first page and so said wasn't found. When I actually compared it
to my build
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:34, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
> On 01.31.2012 04:38, Myra Nelson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:13, Ionut Biru wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the info. There are many things I still don't know. I
>> figured by
>> rebuilding them it would tell me if something wa
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:50:27 +0100
> Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> udev should never, ever mount stuff itself. This is dangerous and
>> explicitly not supported. Consider using systemd, udisks or another
>> daemon for this purpose. For more info
On 01/31/2012 06:37 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/sudo_debug.html
>
> Is sudo on arch built with?
>
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
>
yes it is. we also have the version that is supposed to have the
vulnerability fixed.
> I couldn't find it in makepkg.conf anyway?
>
may
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/sudo_debug.html
>
> Is sudo on arch built with?
>
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
>
> I couldn't find it in makepkg.conf anyway?
Is it
http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/sudo&i
On 31 January 2012 18:37, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/sudo_debug.html
>
> Is sudo on arch built with?
>
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
>
> I couldn't find it in makepkg.conf anyway?
>
> --
> Kc
I got sudo 1.8.3.p2, which is said to fix the problem. Wait a bit for
your mirror to
On 31.01.2012 17:37, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/sudo_debug.html
>
> Is sudo on arch built with?
>
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
yes
>
> I couldn't find it in makepkg.conf anyway?
>
You should merge the .pacnew
--
Florian Pritz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/sudo_debug.html
Is sudo on arch built with?
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
I couldn't find it in makepkg.conf anyway?
--
Kc
On 01.31.2012 04:38, Myra Nelson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:13, Ionut Biru
wrote:
Thanks for the info. There are many things I still don't know. I
figured by
rebuilding them it would tell me if something was wrong on my
machine.
Another reason for me not to file a bug report. The p
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:50:27 +0100
Tom Gundersen wrote:
> udev should never, ever mount stuff itself. This is dangerous and
> explicitly not supported. Consider using systemd, udisks or another
> daemon for this purpose. For more info about this, see the recent
> discussion on the linux-hotplug ma
On 01/30/2012 07:20 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> Hi David, I'm experiencing the same thing, but it can get worse/better
> depending upon the gtk-2 theme used. Firefox and Thunderbird seem to
> be compiled against gtk-2...
>
> I'm using OverglossedHybrid for gtk-2, and I don't want to change. If
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/30/2012 05:37 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Could this have something todo with the rebuild of libpng/libtiff? With
> other words: Do you have the testing repos enabled?
>
I don't have testing enabled. I don't think it is libpng/libtiff related be
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Two comments:
>
> This can be solved by making /media a tmpfs and require its subdirs to
> be recreated on demand (as systemd does).
>
> udev should never, ever mount stuff itself. This is dangerous and
> explicitly not supported. Consider us
Hi Kevin,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Should /bin and /sbin contain all the statically built execs to
> increase the reliability of single user mode.
Nah, we don't really build static binaries, and /usr must be available
even in single user mode. IMHO /bin and /sbin
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:54:08 +
Clive Cooper wrote:
> > IMHO it is not the worst thing to separate /bin and /usr/bin ;-)
> > https://github.com/MrMEEE/bumblebee-Old-and-abbandoned/commit/a047be85247755cdbe0acce6
Ah good a public thread, my message to the dev list got bounced.
As a new user to
On 01/31/2012 11:38 AM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:13, Ionut Biru wrote:
>
>> On 01/31/2012 10:10 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>>> Just reinstalling them would be enough...This is an issue with
>>> running the install scripts and the order in which the packages are
>>> installe
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:13, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 10:10 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> > Just reinstalling them would be enough...This is an issue with
> > running the install scripts and the order in which the packages are
> > installed. I believe that this is being looked into.
>
On 01/31/2012 10:10 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 31/01/12 17:48, Myra Nelson wrote:
>> I suppose this should go to the bug tracker, however I'll do it here first.
>> It seems a bit much to file a pair of bugs for.
>>
>> During my updates this evening the libpng/libtiff rebuild bit.
>>
>> ( 7/85) upg
27 matches
Mail list logo
