Am 26.01.2012 00:01, schrieb Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista:
Hi,
When kde 4.8 will be available in extra repossitories??
hey, dont put pressure on the great people compiling, testing and
packing for us. i think, we arch users really cant complain about not
beeing fed with fresh updates.
btw: do
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:43 +0100, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> Try hacking the source code: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=123911
:)
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:29 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:09 -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > Well, usually people complain that pacman doesn't show enough info... Have
> > you
> > tried the -q options?
>
> No I didn't.
>
> # pacman -Syup
>
> at the moment only will remove
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Ralf Madorf
wrote:
> # pacman -Syup
>
> at the moment only will remove the unwanted output.
Try hacking the source code: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=123911
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 17:09 -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Well, usually people complain that pacman doesn't show enough info... Have you
> tried the -q options?
No I didn't.
# pacman -Syup
at the moment only will remove the unwanted output.
Thank you,
Ralf
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:41:10AM +0530, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just discovered this kernel exploit which allows a local user
> to obtain root priviliges. The detailed explanation is given at [1].
> The patch has been apparently fixed in the kernel as of now (according
> to the bl
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:16 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:02 +0100, Stefan Wilkens wrote:
> > 2012/1/25 Ralf Madorf :
> > > Hi :)
> > >
> > > I wonder if warnings like
> > >
> > > # pacman -Syu
> > > warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community
> > > (0.5.
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 00:02 +0100, Stefan Wilkens wrote:
> 2012/1/25 Ralf Madorf :
> > Hi :)
> >
> > I wonder if warnings like
> >
> > # pacman -Syu
> > warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community
> > (0.5.3-1)
> > warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than archaudio-prev
On 25.01.12 at 20:01, Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When kde 4.8 will be available in extra repossitories??
Soon.
pgpoEpOWbL0TL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:53:57 +0100
Ralf Madorf wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> I wonder if warnings like
>
> # pacman -Syu
> warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community
> (0.5.3-1)
> warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than archaudio-preview
> (20090920-1)
>
> are useful? Once
2012/1/25 Ralf Madorf :
> Hi :)
>
> I wonder if warnings like
>
> # pacman -Syu
> warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community
> (0.5.3-1)
> warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than archaudio-preview
> (20090920-1)
>
> are useful? Once there will be more packages, it wil
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Ralf Madorf
wrote:
> I wonder if warnings like
> are useful? Once there will be more packages, it will become
> uncomfortable to read more important output.
This is nothing new, pacman 3 had these too.
You should read the whole output anyway because there's no te
Hi :)
I wonder if warnings like
# pacman -Syu
warning: qtractor: local (0.5.3.15-2684) is newer than community
(0.5.3-1)
warning: rtirq: local (20111007-1) is newer than archaudio-preview
(20090920-1)
are useful? Once there will be more packages, it will become
uncomfortable to read more importa
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:07:10 -0600
> "David C. Rankin" wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both
>> the kernel and kernel-lts in the same 'pacman -Syu' call. So I answered 'no'
>> w
Hi,
Am 24.01.2012 16:09, schrieb Denis A. Altoé Falqueto:
> I agree, of course. But I couldn't find the bug tracker for bluez on its site.
Well, it seems they are using the mailing lists for that kind of things.
I'll subscribe to it and try to mention our problems with it.
Best regards,
Karol Ba
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:43:57 +0100
Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:25:12 -0600
> schrieb Leonid Isaev :
>
> > I have just noticed a problem with xfce clock panel-plugin:
> > in the LCD mode instead of showing "8" it shown "0", so 6:18 become
> > 10:10. Removing .cache and reintro
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:07:10 -0600
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both
> the kernel and kernel-lts in the same 'pacman -Syu' call. So I answered 'no'
> when prompted to 'Replace kernel26-lts with core/linux-lts? [Y/n]
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:22 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 11:18 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, David Rosenstrauch
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The screen brightness increase and decrease keys on my laptop seem to be
>>> no
>>> longer working.
>>
>>
>> This i
On 01/25/2012 11:18 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
The screen brightness increase and decrease keys on my laptop seem to be no
longer working.
This is udev's fault, udev-179 in testing should have fixed it. I'll
move it to core asap.
-t
Try installing udev-git from the AUR. I had a similar problem with the
Fn key in combination with the F1-F12 keys on my laptop; X wasn't
registering any keypress events for those keystrokes. A thread on the
forums about a related issue [1] suggested trying udev-git and it solved
the problem for me.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> The screen brightness increase and decrease keys on my laptop seem to be no
> longer working.
This is udev's fault, udev-179 in testing should have fixed it. I'll
move it to core asap.
-t
The screen brightness increase and decrease keys on my laptop seem to be
no longer working. They were definitely working a week or so ago, so
I'm thinking some recent upgrade is responsible.
It's not that the keypress is registering and the app just doesn't
brighten the screen. But rather, t
On 01/25/2012 08:16 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote:
> I think pacman is right. What you asked would make the installation
> inconsistent: you don't want to replace kernel-lts and will try to
> install linux-lts, which conflicts with the former. I think you should
> first use pacman -Syu --ignore
On 01/25/2012 08:07 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both
> the kernel and kernel-lts in the same 'pacman -Syu' call. So I answered 'no'
> when prompted to 'Replace kernel26-lts with core/linux-lts? [Y/n] n'. However,
>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:07 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both
> the kernel and kernel-lts in the same 'pacman -Syu' call. So I answered 'no'
> when prompted to 'Replace kernel26-lts with core/linux-lts? [Y/n] n'. H
Guys,
I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both
the kernel and kernel-lts in the same 'pacman -Syu' call. So I answered 'no'
when prompted to 'Replace kernel26-lts with core/linux-lts? [Y/n] n'. However,
then pacman fails to install anything because 'linux-lts a
Peter Lewis [2012.01.25 0919 +]:
> On Monday 23 Jan 2012 21:53:25 Norbert Zeh wrote:
> > Laptop/intel graphics: Boots/reboots/halts all fine, as long as I don't
> > suspend to RAM. After suspend to RAM, screen backlight is on, but screen
> > remains black until turning the machine off. Apart
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Alexandre Ferrando wrote:
> On 25 January 2012 09:41, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando
>> wrote:
>>> On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8
On Monday 23 Jan 2012 21:53:25 Norbert Zeh wrote:
> Laptop/intel graphics: Boots/reboots/halts all fine, as long as I don't
> suspend to RAM. After suspend to RAM, screen backlight is on, but screen
> remains black until turning the machine off. Apart from the screen issue,
> the machine seems to
On 25 January 2012 09:41, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando
> wrote:
>> On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>> :: Starting full system upgrade...
>>> warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
>>> warning: libxcb: local (1.8-
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando wrote:
> On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>> :: Starting full system upgrade...
>> warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
>> warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2)
>> warning: xcb-proto:
On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> :: Starting full system upgrade...
> warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
> warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2)
> warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)
>
> I thought it'd just
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2)
warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)
I thought it'd just be an outdated mirror or something, but a check on
arc
33 matches
Mail list logo
