On Oct 19, 2011 3:59 AM, "Heiko Baums" wrote:
>
> Am Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:49:20 +0200
> schrieb Pataricza Zsolt :
>
> > Try Google instead. Enter:
> > something you want to find site:bbs.archlinux.org
>
> This has nothing to do with the search interval issue.
>
> And does Google really need to know
On (10/18/11 15:49), David C. Rankin wrote:
-~> On 10/18/2011 03:05 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
-~> >Well, a simple search shows that rtkit has an open bug report,
-~> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698040, which explains why you
have
-~> >its logs in UTC. Regarding the rest, are you say
On 10/18/2011 03:05 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
Well, a simple search shows that rtkit has an open bug report,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698040, which explains why you have
its logs in UTC. Regarding the rest, are you saying the system spontaneously
rebooted after a successfull reco
Le 18/10/2011 22:17, Jakob Gruber a écrit :
> On 10/19/2011 12:09 AM, Timothée Ravier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using pacman from testing and I ran into some troubles.
>
> Edit /etc/pacman.d/gnupg/gpg.conf to use a different keyserver, for example:
>
> keyserver hkp://pgp.mit.edu
>
> Seems like ke
On 10/19/2011 12:09 AM, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using pacman from testing and I ran into some troubles.
Edit /etc/pacman.d/gnupg/gpg.conf to use a different keyserver, for example:
keyserver hkp://pgp.mit.edu
Seems like keys.gnupg.net is currently having some issues.
The long timeo
On 10/18/2011 11:55 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Here is one for the brain-trust to consider. Something totally screwed up the
time on my computer during an apcupsd commanded shutdown and the subsequent
reboot resulting in a 479 Minute time disparity. I don't think this was
handled on the fi
Hi,
I'm using pacman from testing and I ran into some troubles.
I set "SigLevel = Optional TrustAll" in pacman.conf, but I'm still
getting a lot of warnings even after I add the keys to the repo.
It also takes an ENORMOUS amount of time to do I don't know what right
after checking packages integ
On (10/18/11 11:55), David C. Rankin wrote:
-~> Guys,
-~>
-~> Here is one for the brain-trust to consider. Something totally
-~> screwed up the time on my computer during an apcupsd commanded
-~> shutdown and the subsequent reboot resulting in a 479 Minute time
-~> disparity. I don't think this
Am Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:49:20 +0200
schrieb Pataricza Zsolt :
> Try Google instead. Enter:
> something you want to find site:bbs.archlinux.org
This has nothing to do with the search interval issue.
And does Google really need to know everything? And what is the forums'
search function for?
Heiko
*Küldés ideje:* Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:46:03 +0200.
/Heiko Baums írta:/
In the forums https://bbs.archlinux.org it's only possible to run one
search within 60 seconds (1 minute).
This is very annoying if someone has a problem, a search term
doesn't give a search result, and a new search with a dif
In the forums https://bbs.archlinux.org it's only possible to run one
search within 60 seconds (1 minute).
This is very annoying if someone has a problem, a search term
doesn't give a search result, and a new search with a different search
term has to be done.
So, could this interval, please, con
Guys,
Here is one for the brain-trust to consider. Something totally screwed up
the time on my computer during an apcupsd commanded shutdown and the
subsequent reboot resulting in a 479 Minute time disparity. I don't think this
was handled on the first reboot after the power outage because a
12 matches
Mail list logo
