On 09/11/2011 02:26 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
Anyone experiencing this bug?
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25914
I think further investigation would be good,
A 'it works for me' from one single person is enough to close the issue?
no wonder it was closed, the bug doesn't have any
Yeah, it is *just* VLC, that's why I sent the email.
I will see if it disappears eventually.
Am Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:26:22 -0700
schrieb Bernardo Barros :
> Last VLC package is giving me distorted sounds, not happening with
> vlc-1.1.7-6 from
>
> http://arm.konnichi.com/extra/os/x86_64/vlc-1.1.7-6-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
>
> Or with *any other* program installed in my computer, just VLC after
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 06:17:01AM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 11 September 2011 06:12, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:56:08AM +0300, cantabile wrote:
> >
> >> This thread is relevant:
> >> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2010-June/014388.html
> >
> > Y
Last VLC package is giving me distorted sounds, not happening with
vlc-1.1.7-6 from
http://arm.konnichi.com/extra/os/x86_64/vlc-1.1.7-6-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
Or with *any other* program installed in my computer, just VLC after
version 1.1.7-6
Anyone experiencing this bug?
https://bugs.archlinu
On 11 September 2011 06:12, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:56:08AM +0300, cantabile wrote:
>
>> This thread is relevant:
>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2010-June/014388.html
>
> Yes and no.
>
> Early ADSL modems (such as the green Alcatel flat fish shap
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:56:08AM +0300, cantabile wrote:
> This thread is relevant:
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2010-June/014388.html
Yes and no.
Early ADSL modems (such as the green Alcatel flat fish shaped one,
I still have it) required you to set up a ppp connectio
On 09/10/2011 07:27 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Hello all,
Since my (unknown) neighbour finally got smart enough to
lock me out of his wireless access point (still unencrypted,
probably filters on MAC address now), I got a Vodafone USB
internet key, and even managed to make it work. But I've
the
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 05:31:44AM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> wvdial needs to start pppd to connect. Without pppd, wvdial is
> useless.
??? wvdial only starts pppd *after* having made the connection.
It certainly doesn't need pppd to make the connection.
> The ppp0 is the proper device (registe
On 11 September 2011 05:08, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> I don't explicitly use pppd, wvdial does. And it looks as if it
> shouldn't - just do the dialling and then let something else (e.g.
> dhcpcd) set up the already existing interface (usb0). But wvdial
> has no options to make it do that AFAIK.
w
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:02:12PM +0200, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> On 09/10/11 at 04:27pm, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > Since my (unknown) neighbour finally got smart enough to
> > lock me out of his wireless access point (still unencrypted,
> > probably filters on MAC address now)-
>
> Or maybe h
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 04:56:29AM +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 11 September 2011 00:27, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > Since my (unknown) neighbour finally got smart enough to
> > lock me out of his wireless access point (still unencrypted,
> > probably filters on MAC address now), I got a Vodafone
On 11 September 2011 01:17, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> you could try MAC spoofing. :P It would work if your neighbor has
> blocked your MAC address.
Most people usually go for selective access, rather than selective
blocking, since most users usually don't have the technical
inclination to actually
On 09/10/11 at 04:27pm, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> Since my (unknown) neighbour finally got smart enough to
> lock me out of his wireless access point (still unencrypted,
> probably filters on MAC address now)-
Or maybe he was just being a good neighbour and got tired of having his
bandwidth abuse
On 11 September 2011 00:27, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> Since my (unknown) neighbour finally got smart enough to
> lock me out of his wireless access point (still unencrypted,
> probably filters on MAC address now), I got a Vodafone USB
> internet key, and even managed to make it work. But I've
> the
you could try MAC spoofing. :P It would work if your neighbor has
blocked your MAC address.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:44:29PM +0300, Mantas M. wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 04:27:20PM +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > 2. The fact that I have _two_ new network interfaces.
> >The existence of the 'usb0' one seems to suggest I
> >don't need pppd at all, but how then to bring it
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 04:27:20PM +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> 2. The fact that I have _two_ new network interfaces.
>The existence of the 'usb0' one seems to suggest I
>don't need pppd at all, but how then to bring it up ?
`dhcpcd usb0` might just be enough.
--
Mantas M.
Hello all,
Since my (unknown) neighbour finally got smart enough to
lock me out of his wireless access point (still unencrypted,
probably filters on MAC address now), I got a Vodafone USB
internet key, and even managed to make it work. But I've
the impression that my current configuration isn't r
Bastien Dejean a écrit :
> I seems the good slot is EHC1.
> I'll test...
Solved.
--
Bastien
Jesse Jaara a écrit :
> No those are the the user/group of the device node FILE
> /dev/sdc1 and teell who is allowed to interact with the disk.
I solved it with:
# chown -hR root:storage /media/foo
# chmod 775 /media/foo
Cheers,
--
Bastien
2011/9/10 Bastien Dejean :
> Jesse Jaara a écrit :
>
>> To put it simply the ext filesystem supports UNIX file attributes
>> and stores the owner and group of the file in the disk
>
> % ls -l /dev/sdc1
> brw-rw 1 root storage 8, 49 Sep 10 12:48 /dev/sdc1
>
> Shouldn't /media/foo have the same u
Jesse Jaara a écrit :
> To put it simply the ext filesystem supports UNIX file attributes
> and stores the owner and group of the file in the disk
% ls -l /dev/sdc1
brw-rw 1 root storage 8, 49 Sep 10 12:48 /dev/sdc1
Shouldn't /media/foo have the same user/group ?
--
Bastien
Jesse Jaara a écrit :
> To put it simply the ext filesystem supports UNIX file attributes
> and stores the owner and group of the file in the disk, unlike
> FAT does. So currently the user/group the ext3 says the file
> is owned by, doesn't exist in the current system.
All right, but I did:
# chow
To put it simply the ext filesystem supports UNIX file attributes
and stores the owner and group of the file in the disk, unlike
FAT does. So currently the user/group the ext3 says the file
is owned by, doesn't exist in the current system.
--
(\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile
(0.o ) to help h
Hi,
I'm using the first rule given here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Udev
When I plug a USB (fat32) stick, the permissions of the corresponding
directory under /media are fine (root:users), but when I plug an external
HD (ext3, also through USB), I get the following user:group settings:
26 matches
Mail list logo
