Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] b43-fwcutter-015

2011-08-30 Thread jwbirdsong
On 08/30/2011 12:33 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Hi guys, > bump to latest version. > Please signoff both arches, > > greetings > tpowa Signoff x64_64 Still extracts/installs as expected. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0.4-1

2011-08-30 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Am 30.08.2011 11:38, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > Latest kernel is in testing, > please signoff for both arches > > greetings > tpowa anyone i686? -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: Open

Re: [arch-general] ettercap new upstream

2011-08-30 Thread Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana
Did you think to provide a stable tarball? I don't think git clone is a good idea for an extra and stable package ;) -- Bl@ster / dottorblaster

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-lts 2.6.32.46-1

2011-08-30 Thread Thorsten Töpper
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:38:25 +0200 Tobias Powalowski wrote: > Latest LTS kernel is in testing, > please signoff for both arches > > greetings > tpowa signoff i686 -- Jabber: atsut...@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E

Re: [arch-general] ettercap new upstream

2011-08-30 Thread Timothy M. Redaelli
On 30 August 2011 20:37, Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana wrote: > Hi Tim, > Does your version complain about GCC and other jibber jabber? > I need to know if your fork compiles fine under Arch, especially the > GTK frontend. You can compile my (git) version from aur (package ettercap-drizzbsd). I te

Re: [arch-general] ettercap new upstream

2011-08-30 Thread Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana
Hi Tim, Does your version complain about GCC and other jibber jabber? I need to know if your fork compiles fine under Arch, especially the GTK frontend. -- Bl@ster / dottorblaster

Re: [arch-general] ettercap new upstream

2011-08-30 Thread Jesse Jaara
30.08.2011 21:04, Timothy M. Redaelli kirjoitti: > Hi, > some month ago I decided to become the new ettercap upstream maintainer. > I released a fixed 0.7.4 version - > https://github.com/drizztbsd/ettercap/tarball/NG-0.7.4 - that is > included in debian testing and sid. > > Should I flag the etter

[arch-general] ettercap new upstream

2011-08-30 Thread Timothy M. Redaelli
Hi, some month ago I decided to become the new ettercap upstream maintainer. I released a fixed 0.7.4 version - https://github.com/drizztbsd/ettercap/tarball/NG-0.7.4 - that is included in debian testing and sid. Should I flag the ettercap package as old? -- Timothy M. Redaelli IT Consultant Ema

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26-lts 2.6.32.46-1

2011-08-30 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Latest LTS kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[arch-general] [signoff] linux-3.0.4-1

2011-08-30 Thread Tobias Powalowski
Latest kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tp...@archlinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature