On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm aware that recently there has been some changes in libreoffice
> package. The problem is that yesterday I updated my system and
> surprisingly only libreoffice-common was updated. By that I mean that
> I mean that not base, w
Hi,
I checked the wiki again and I clearly missed the line where it says
how to make the installation now.
pacman -S libreoffice-common
libreoffice-{base,calc,draw,impress,math,writer,gnome,kde4,sdk,sdk-doc}
Still I think we should make a container.
Sorry for the inconvenience,
Hector
On 3 Augus
Hi,
I'm aware that recently there has been some changes in libreoffice
package. The problem is that yesterday I updated my system and
surprisingly only libreoffice-common was updated. By that I mean that
I mean that not base, writer, impress... were available after the
update, they dissapered. More
On 08/02/11 12:52, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26`
package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
>
> Upstream
> changes:
> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
>
> Archlinux Changes:
> - Rename the package kernel26 -> linux
> - Added replaces everywhere
> - Removed old comments an
2011/8/2 Lukáš Jirkovský :
>> Now stuff to discuss before uploading to testing:
>> - kernel name: vmlinuz-linux
>> - initramfs name: initramfs-linux.img
>> same for fallback of course.
>>
>
> Why not use only
> - kernel name: vmlinuz
> - initramfs name: initramfs.img
> and for fallback
> - kernel
> Now stuff to discuss before uploading to testing:
> - kernel name: vmlinuz-linux
> - initramfs name: initramfs-linux.img
> same for fallback of course.
>
Why not use only
- kernel name: vmlinuz
- initramfs name: initramfs.img
and for fallback
- kernel name: vmlinuz-fallback
- initramfs name: in
C Anthony Risinger, Tue 2011-08-02 @ 14:18:34-0500:
> ssh -CNfc arcfour -L 80:A:22 USER@localhost
You need an extra ':' in front of the 80 (":80:A:22"), otherwise it will
reject connections to the tunnel port that originate anywhere other than
the local host.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:13 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
> would also need the host to connect to, `A:21` is only the forwarding spec:
>
> ssh -CNfc arcfour -L 80:A:22 USER@A
whoops, my bad:
ssh -CNfc arcfour -L 80:A:22 USER@localhost
:-) my work here is done!
C Anthony
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Jesse Young wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Philipp wrote:
>> Problem: A server situated in a network that can't be reached from the
>> outside, all ports are blocked. I want to give specific outside users
>> simple ftp access to a directory on this server
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote:
> Maybe somebody has a better solution than this, but to me, the following
> would be the obvious approach.
>
> If host "A" is the fully firewalled server that hosts the FTP directory,
> and server "B" is the server on which port 80 is accessib
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Philipp wrote:
> Problem: A server situated in a network that can't be reached from the
> outside, all ports are blocked. I want to give specific outside users
> simple ftp access to a directory on this server (password protected).
>
> I'm in control of the server i
Maybe somebody has a better solution than this, but to me, the following
would be the obvious approach.
If host "A" is the fully firewalled server that hosts the FTP directory,
and server "B" is the server on which port 80 is accessible, then:
1. Run an FTP daemon on server A which limits acc
Hi there,
I know this isn't very arch specific but I lack ideas on where else to
ask.
Problem: A server situated in a network that can't be reached from the
outside, all ports are blocked. I want to give specific outside users
simple ftp access to a directory on this server (password protected).
On Aug 2, 2011 6:39 PM, "C Anthony Risinger" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski
> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
> >
> > Upstream
> > changes:
> > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
> >
> > Archlinux Changes:
> > - Rename the packag
Hi,
I am trying out "finger" command
I have an error when I run:
finger sacarde
I have:
finger: /dev//лM-^D: No such file or directory
Login: sacarde Name: (null)
Directory: /home/sacardeShell: /bin/bash
On since Wed Jul 27 08:12 (CEST) on :0 (messa
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:03 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> meh whatever :-) i guess i don't really care anyway since i would
>> never run an older one, but i thought there was a technical reason for
>> the split originally ... though that
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:03 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> meh whatever :-) i guess i don't really care anyway since i would
> never run an older one, but i thought there was a technical reason for
> the split originally ... though that reason is escaping me now
> (providing said reason even exi
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Vic Demuzere wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2011 6:53 PM, "C Anthony Risinger" wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for ha
On Aug 2, 2011 6:53 PM, "C Anthony Risinger" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger
wrote:
> >>
> >> ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26`
> >> package was to also have a `kernel24` (f
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>
>> ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26`
>> package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't
>> around then) how is this handled wit
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:38 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> ... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26`
> package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't
> around then) how is this handled with the `linux` package? or is this
> a non-issue?
We no longer
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
>
> Upstream
> changes:
> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
>
> Archlinux Changes:
> - Rename the package kernel26 -> linux
> - Added replaces everywhere
> - Removed old comments an
hi,
I found in my arch64, into xinetd package, 2 daemon:
"servers" and "services"
they are using 9098 and 9099 port, and are disabled
I dont understand what they are for
thank you
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Milos Negovanovic
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:44:54AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> Beginning 8/1 at 01:59, I began getting emails regarding "cron for
>> user root job sys-hourly" that contain:
>>
>> Usage: /usr/sbin/run-cron crondir
>>
>
>
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:44:54AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Beginning 8/1 at 01:59, I began getting emails regarding "cron for
> user root job sys-hourly" that contain:
>
> Usage: /usr/sbin/run-cron crondir
>
mkdir /etc/cron.hourly
Regards
--
Milos Negovanovic
milos.negovan
Guys,
Beginning 8/1 at 01:59, I began getting emails regarding "cron for user root
job sys-hourly" that contain:
Usage: /usr/sbin/run-cron crondir
Looking at the logs, I haven't had any cron updates since:
[2011-05-04 14:34] upgraded dcron (4.4-2 -> 4.5-2)
The cron log shows the syste
On 08/02/2011 06:30 AM, Bastien Dejean wrote:
> Dwight Schauer a écrit :
>
>>> On 02/08/11 18:52, Bastien Dejean wrote:
Why is there an official arch pkg for msmtp but not for mpop?
>> Because something like fetchmail does the same thing as mpop?
>
> It seems there are plenty reasons to pref
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Bastien Dejean wrote:
> Dwight Schauer a écrit :
>
>> > On 02/08/11 18:52, Bastien Dejean wrote:
>> >> Why is there an official arch pkg for msmtp but not for mpop?
>> Because something like fetchmail does the same thing as mpop?
>
> It seems there are plenty reason
Dwight Schauer a écrit :
> > On 02/08/11 18:52, Bastien Dejean wrote:
> >> Why is there an official arch pkg for msmtp but not for mpop?
> Because something like fetchmail does the same thing as mpop?
It seems there are plenty reasons to prefer mpop over fetchmail:
http://mpop.sourceforge.net/com
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 02/08/11 18:52, Bastien Dejean wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Why is there an official arch pkg for msmtp but not for mpop?
>>
>
> Because...
>
Because something like fetchmail does the same thing as mpop?
On 02/08/11 18:52, Bastien Dejean wrote:
Hello,
Why is there an official arch pkg for msmtp but not for mpop?
Because...
Hello,
Why is there an official arch pkg for msmtp but not for mpop?
--
Bastien
On 08/02/2011 09:19 AM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
I haven't been able to make VMware Workstation 7.1.4 work with kernel 3.0-2.
Downgraded to 3.0-1 and works again.
Everything else seems to work fine.
Best Regards,
Guillermo Leira
Probably s
> Hi guys,
> please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
>
I haven't been able to make VMware Workstation 7.1.4 work with kernel 3.0-2.
Downgraded to 3.0-1 and works again.
Everything else seems to work fine.
Best Regards,
Guillermo Leira
35 matches
Mail list logo
