Re: [arch-general] The OpenCL ICD problem

I think that the "libcl" pkg might very well be based off of amd's loader. I made a simple PKGBUILD just to demonstrate: http://codepad.org/iK2oBo0W It contains the shared object and OpenCL info utility, it is up to date, has no dependencies and is only 88kB in size ;-) ~kralyk

Re: [arch-general] The OpenCL ICD problem

2011/7/8 Nicolas Bigaouette : > I think it requires 1.0 to provide, well, 1.0... Version 1.1 adds many > things. For example, there is no type3 (float3, int3, etc.) in 1.0, just in > 1.1. So if your code uses float3, then you'll probably get some undefined > symbols when linking to a 1.0 libOpenCL.

Re: [arch-general] The OpenCL ICD problem

> > @Nicolas: > You pointed out that the nVidia ICD loader (libOpenCL.so) is only > 1.0 (outdated), > that is correct, but the ICD specs only require 1.0, so 1.1 possibly > should not be needed. > See specs: > http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/extensions/khr/cl_khr_icd.txt > I think it requires 1

Re: [arch-general] The OpenCL ICD problem

So, what is going on? Don't you guys quit on me... @Nicolas: You pointed out that the nVidia ICD loader (libOpenCL.so) is only 1.0 (outdated), that is correct, but the ICD specs only require 1.0, so 1.1 possibly should not be needed. See specs: http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/extensions/khr/c

[arch-general] Objective C ABI version

Hi, I have a small question about ObjC ABI. (See openvpn-authldap-plugin: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30584) This package can be built only with export OBJCFLAGS=-fobjc-abi-version=2 As I understand gcc-objc uses ABI version 0 by default, but this ABI support already dropped from