On 7 July 2011 03:02, Baho Utot wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 05:59:33 PM Paul Ezvan wrote:
>> > As a temporary work around, just add a link in /usr/lib from
>> > /usr/lib/libdb-5.1.so -> libdb-5.2.so:
>> >
>> > 13:14 providence:~> sudo ln -sf /usr/lib/libdb-5.2.so
>> > /usr/lib/libdb-5.1.s
On 07/07/11 10:02, Baho Utot wrote:
On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 05:59:33 PM Paul Ezvan wrote:
As a temporary work around, just add a link in /usr/lib from
/usr/lib/libdb-5.1.so -> libdb-5.2.so:
13:14 providence:~> sudo ln -sf /usr/lib/libdb-5.2.so
/usr/lib/libdb-5.1.so 13:14 providence:~> su
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:33:32PM +0200, Florian Pritz wrote:
> Well, perl guys tend to loose the dots so 5.14.1 would be 5.014001. You
> can test that using `perl -v` or `perl -e 'print $^V'` and `perl -e
> 'print $]'`. "$]" and "$^V" contain the perl version you're running in
> different formats
On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 05:59:33 PM Paul Ezvan wrote:
> > As a temporary work around, just add a link in /usr/lib from
> > /usr/lib/libdb-5.1.so -> libdb-5.2.so:
> >
> > 13:14 providence:~> sudo ln -sf /usr/lib/libdb-5.2.so
> > /usr/lib/libdb-5.1.so 13:14 providence:~> sudo /etc/rc.d/postfix r
clemens fischer wrote:
> % urxvt
> urxvt: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so: undefined
> symbol: Perl_Istack_sp_ptr
>
> I moved Util.so elsewhere and urxvt started working again.
>
> But:
>
> # cpanp
> Data::Dumper object version 2.130_02 does not matc
>
> As a temporary work around, just add a link in /usr/lib from
> /usr/lib/libdb-5.1.so -> libdb-5.2.so:
>
> 13:14 providence:~> sudo ln -sf /usr/lib/libdb-5.2.so /usr/lib/libdb-5.1.so
> 13:14 providence:~> sudo /etc/rc.d/postfix restart
>
> That will bring postfix back up until the package i
Am Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:37:05 +0530
schrieb Madhurya Kakati :
> the second log that i pasted(after the upgrade), I ran mkinitpcio and
> rebooted before posting it.
Like I said before, update the packages fbsplash and fbsplash-extras to
the latest versions, of course, run locate pacnew, adapt the
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 22:12:54 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
> it was fixed couples of hours ago in postfix-2.8.3-4.1
Confirmed, thanks!
Geert
--
geert.hendrickx.be :: ge...@hendrickx.be :: PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!
On 07/06/2011 03:12 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 07/06/2011 02:00 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 07/06/2011 01:46 PM, D. R. Evans wrote:
Guillaume Brunerie said the following at 07/04/2011 11:01 AM :
It seems you have an Intel graphics card and that the driver does not
want
to start.
Ha
On 07/06/2011 10:03 PM, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
Same here.
On x86_64, postfix-2.8.3-4 is linked to the new db version, whereas
on i686, it is (accidentally?) still linked to the old.
I've recompiled my own as a workaround on i686.
Geert
it was fixed couples of hours ago in postfix-
On 07/06/2011 02:00 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 07/06/2011 01:46 PM, D. R. Evans wrote:
Guillaume Brunerie said the following at 07/04/2011 11:01 AM :
It seems you have an Intel graphics card and that the driver does not
want
to start.
Have you read the page https://wiki.archlinux.org/ind
Same here.
On x86_64, postfix-2.8.3-4 is linked to the new db version, whereas
on i686, it is (accidentally?) still linked to the old.
I've recompiled my own as a workaround on i686.
Geert
On 07/06/2011 01:06 PM, Thaddeus Nielsen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:08:13PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 07/06/2011 11:19 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 07/06/2011 05:43 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
OK, it looks like a missing link from db 5.2.28-1. On x86_64, I have the
same thing, but postfix
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:08:13PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 07/06/2011 11:19 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> >On 07/06/2011 05:43 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> >>>OK, it looks like a missing link from db 5.2.28-1. On x86_64, I have the
> >>>same thing, but postfix restarts just fine. What do we need to
On 07/06/2011 01:46 PM, D. R. Evans wrote:
Guillaume Brunerie said the following at 07/04/2011 11:01 AM :
It seems you have an Intel graphics card and that the driver does not want
to start.
Have you read the page https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Intel ?
In particular you need to install th
Guillaume Brunerie said the following at 07/04/2011 11:01 AM :
> 2011/7/4 D. R. Evans
>
>> I just installed arch for the first time (trying it out since I am unhappy
>> with the state of Kubuntu). I have, I think, followed the installation
>> instructions carefully. Everything seemed OK until I t
On 07/06/2011 11:19 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 07/06/2011 05:43 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
OK, it looks like a missing link from db 5.2.28-1. On x86_64, I have the
same thing, but postfix restarts just fine. What do we need to do to get
postfix to look for libdb-5.2.so instead of libdb-5.1.so on x86?
On 07/06/2011 05:43 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
OK, it looks like a missing link from db 5.2.28-1. On x86_64, I have the
same thing, but postfix restarts just fine. What do we need to do to get
postfix to look for libdb-5.2.so instead of libdb-5.1.so on x86?
all this output is useless without pacma
On Wed 06 Jul 2011 09:08:10 PM IST, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:31:56 PM Madhurya Kakati wrote:
>> Hi,
>> After a recent system upgrade fbsplash fails to run during boot. However
>> while shutting down i can see the splash. Its only during the start up
>> that I can't see it.
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 09:31:56 PM Madhurya Kakati wrote:
> Hi,
> After a recent system upgrade fbsplash fails to run during boot. However
> while shutting down i can see the splash. Its only during the start up
> that I can't see it.
> This is the /var/log/boot some days before the upgrade
> ht
On 07/06/2011 05:36 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
This may just be on i686, but I'm trying to figure out what happened.
During update this morning, postfix refused to start. The upgrade error
was:
(41/46) upgrading postfix [###] 100%
newaliases: error whil
Guys,
This may just be on i686, but I'm trying to figure out what happened.
During update this morning, postfix refused to start. The upgrade error was:
(41/46) upgrading postfix
[###] 100%
newaliases: error while loading shared libraries: libdb-5.1.so: c
Am Wed, 06 Jul 2011 08:01:56 +0530
schrieb Madhurya Kakati :
> Hi,
> After a recent system upgrade fbsplash fails to run during boot.
> However while shutting down i can see the splash. Its only during the
> start up that I can't see it.
> This is the /var/log/boot some days before the upgrade
> h
23 matches
Mail list logo
